Dataset Information

In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: the role of the receptor structure and ensembles in accurate docking.

ABSTRACT: Accurate ranking during in silico lead optimization is critical to drive the generation of new ligands with higher affinity, yet it is especially difficult because of the subtle changes between analogs. In order to assess the role of the structure of the receptor in delivering accurate lead ranking results, we docked a set of forty related inhibitors to structures of one species of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) derived from crystallographic, NMR solution data, and homology models. In this study, the crystal structures yielded the superior results: the compounds were placed in the active site in the conserved orientation and the docking scores for 80% percent of the compounds clustered into the same bins as the measured affinity. Single receptor structures derived from NMR data or homology models did not serve as accurate docking receptors. To our knowledge, these are the first experiments that assess ranking of homologous lead compounds using a variety of receptor structures. We then extended the study to investigate whether ensembles, either computationally or experimentally derived, of all of the single starting structures aid, hinder or have no effect on the performance of the starting template. Impressively, when ensembles of receptor structures derived from NMR data or homology models were employed, docking accuracy improved to a level equal to that of the high resolution crystal structures. The same experiments using a second species of DHFR and set of ligands confirm the results. A comparison of the structures of the individual ensemble members to the starting structures shows that the effect of the ensembles can be ascribed to protein flexibility in addition to absorption of computational error.

SUBMITTER: Bolstad ES

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3644990 | biostudies-literature | 2008 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: the role of the receptor structure and ensembles in accurate docking.

Bolstad Erin S D ES Anderson Amy C AC

Proteins 20081101 3

Accurate ranking during in silico lead optimization is critical to drive the generation of new ligands with higher affinity, yet it is especially difficult because of the subtle changes between analogs. In order to assess the role of the structure of the receptor in delivering accurate lead ranking results, we docked a set of forty related inhibitors to structures of one species of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) derived from crystallographic, NMR solution data, and homology models. In this study ...[more]

PMID: 18473360

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Protein-ligand docking programs are routinely used in structure-based drug design to find the optimal binding pose of a ligand in the protein's active site. These programs are also used to identify potential drug candidates by ranking large sets of compounds. As more accurate and efficient docking programs are always desirable, constant efforts focus on developing better docking algorithms or improving the scoring function. Recently, chaotic maps have emerged as a promising approach to improve the search behavior of optimization algorithms in terms of search diversity and convergence speed. However, their effectiveness on docking applications has not been explored. Herein, we integrated five popular chaotic maps-logistic, Singer, sinusoidal, tent, and Zaslavskii maps-into PSOVina[Formula: see text], a recent variant of the popular AutoDock Vina program with enhanced global and local search capabilities, and evaluated their performances in ligand pose prediction and virtual screening using four docking benchmark datasets and two virtual screening datasets. RESULTS:Pose prediction experiments indicate that chaos-embedded algorithms outperform AutoDock Vina and PSOVina in ligand pose RMSD, success rate, and run time. In virtual screening experiments, Singer map-embedded PSOVina[Formula: see text] achieved a very significant five- to sixfold speedup with comparable screening performances to AutoDock Vina in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and enrichment factor. Therefore, our results suggest that chaos-embedded PSOVina methods might be a better option than AutoDock Vina for docking and virtual screening tasks. The success of chaotic maps in protein-ligand docking reveals their potential for improving optimization algorithms in other search problems, such as protein structure prediction and folding. The Singer map-embedded PSOVina[Formula: see text] which is named PSOVina-2.0 and all testing datasets are publicly available on https://cbbio.cis.umac.mo/software/psovina .

Project description:Virtual screening (VS) is a well-established method in the initial stages of many drug and material design projects. VS is typically performed using structure-based approaches such as molecular docking, or various ligand-based approaches. Most docking tools were designed to be as global as possible, and consequently only require knowledge on the 3D structure of the biotarget. In contrast, many ligand-based approaches (e.g., 3D-QSAR and pharmacophore) require prior development of project-specific predictive models. Depending on the type of model (e.g., classification or regression), predictive ability is typically evaluated using metrics of performance on either the training set (e.g.,QCV2) or the test set (e.g., specificity, selectivity or QF1/F2/F32). However, none of these metrics were developed with VS in mind, and consequently, their ability to reliably assess the performances of a model in the context of VS is at best limited. With this in mind we have recently reported the development of the enrichment optimization algorithm (EOA). EOA derives QSAR models in the form of multiple linear regression (MLR) equations for VS by optimizing an enrichment-based metric in the space of the descriptors. Here we present an improved version of the algorithm which better handles active compounds and which also takes into account information on inactive (either known inactive or decoy) compounds. We compared the improved EOA in small-scale VS experiments with three common docking tools, namely, Glide-SP, GOLD and AutoDock Vina, employing five molecular targets (acetylcholinesterase, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease, MAP kinase p38 alpha, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, and trypsin I). We found that EOA consistently outperformed all docking tools in terms of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and EF1% metrics that measured the overall and initial success of the VS process, respectively. This was the case when the docking metrics were calculated based on a consensus approach and when they were calculated based on two different sets of single crystal structures. Finally, we propose that EOA could be combined with molecular docking to derive target-specific scoring functions.

Project description:Protein conformational change is an important consideration in ligand-docking screens, but it is difficult to predict. A simple way to account for protein flexibility is to soften the criterion for steric fit between ligand and receptor. A more comprehensive but more expensive method would be to sample multiple receptor conformations explicitly. Here, these two approaches are compared. A "soft" scoring function was created by attenuating the repulsive term in the Lennard-Jones potential, allowing for a closer approach between ligand and protein. The standard, "hard" Lennard-Jones potential was used for docking to multiple receptor conformations. The Available Chemicals Directory (ACD) was screened against two cavity sites in the T4 lysozyme. These sites undergo small but significant conformational changes on ligand binding, making them good systems for soft docking. The ACD was also screened against the drug target aldose reductase, which can undergo large conformational changes on ligand binding. We evaluated the ability of the scoring functions to identify known ligands from among the over 200 000 decoy molecules in the database. The soft potential was always better at identifying known ligands than the hard scoring function when only a single receptor conformation was used. Conversely, the soft function was worse at identifying known leads than the hard function when multiple receptor conformations were used. This was true even for the cavity sites and was especially true for aldose reductase. To test the multiple-conformation method predictively, we screened the ACD for molecules that preferentially docked to the expanded conformation of aldose reductase, known to bind larger ligands. Six novel molecules that ranked among the top 0.66% of hits from the multiple-conformation calculation, but ranked relatively poorly in the soft docking calculation, were tested experimentally for enzyme inhibition. Four of these six inhibited the enzyme, the best with an IC(50) of 8 microM. Although ligands can get better scores in soft docking, the same is also true for decoys. The improved ranking of such decoys can come at the expense of true ligands.

Dataset Information

In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: the role of the receptor structure and ensembles in accurate docking.

Publications

In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: the role of the receptor structure and ensembles in accurate docking.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets