Dataset Information

Shoulder pain in primary care: diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination tests for non-traumatic acromioclavicular joint pain.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Despite numerous methodological flaws in previous study designs and the lack of validation in primary care populations, clinical tests for identifying acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) pain are widely utilised without concern for such issues. The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of traditional ACJ tests and to compare their accuracy with other clinical examination features for identifying a predominant ACJ pain source in a primary care cohort.

Methods

Consecutive patients with shoulder pain were recruited prospectively from primary health care clinics. Following a standardised clinical examination and diagnostic injection into the subacromial bursa, all participants received a fluoroscopically guided diagnostic block of 1% lidocaine hydrochloride (XylocaineTM) into the ACJ. Diagnostic accuracy statistics including sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) were calculated for traditional ACJ tests (Active Compression/O'Brien's test, cross-body adduction, localised ACJ tenderness and Hawkins-Kennedy test), and for individual and combinations of clinical examination variables that were associated with a positive anaesthetic response (PAR) (P?0.05) defined as 80% or more reduction in post-injection pain intensity during provocative clinical tests.

Results

Twenty two of 153 participants (14%) reported an 80% PAR. None of the traditional ACJ tests were associated with an 80% PAR (P<0.05) and combinations of traditional tests were not able to discriminate between a PAR and a negative anaesthetic response (AUC 0.507; 95% CI: 0.366, 0.647; P>0.05). Five clinical examination variables (repetitive mechanism of pain onset, no referred pain below the elbow, thickened or swollen ACJ, no symptom provocation during passive glenohumeral abduction and external rotation) were associated with an 80% PAR (P<0.05) and demonstrated an ability to accurately discriminate between an PAR and NAR (AUC 0.791; 95% CI 0.702, 0.880; P<0.001). Less than two positive clinical features resulted in 96% sensitivity (95% CI 0.78, 0.99) and a LR- 0.09 (95% CI 0.02, 0.41) and four positive clinical features resulted in 95% specificity (95% CI 0.90, 0.98) and a LR+ of 4.98 (95% CI 1.69, 13.84).

Conclusions

In this cohort of primary care patients with predominantly subacute or chronic ACJ pain of non-traumatic onset, traditional ACJ tests were of limited diagnostic value. Combinations of other history and physical examination findings were able to more accurately identify injection-confirmed ACJ pain in this cohort.

SUBMITTER: Cadogan A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3646690 | biostudies-literature | 2013 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Shoulder pain in primary care: diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination tests for non-traumatic acromioclavicular joint pain.

Cadogan Angela A McNair Peter P Laslett Mark M Hing Wayne W

BMC musculoskeletal disorders 20130501

<h4>Background</h4>Despite numerous methodological flaws in previous study designs and the lack of validation in primary care populations, clinical tests for identifying acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) pain are widely utilised without concern for such issues. The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of traditional ACJ tests and to compare their accuracy with other clinical examination features for identifying a predominant ACJ pain source in a primary care cohort.<h4>Methods</ ...[more]

PMID: 23634871

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundClinical laxity tests are commonly used together to identify individuals with multidirectional instability (MDI). However, their biomechanical validity in distinguishing distinct biomechanical characteristics consistent with MDI has not been demonstrated.ObjectiveTo determine if differences in glenohumeral (GH) joint laxity exist between individuals diagnosed with multidirectional instability (MDI) and asymptomatic matched controls without MDI.MethodsEighteen participants (9 swimmers with MDI, 9 non-swimming asymptomatic matched controls without MDI) participated in this observational study. Participants were classified as having MDI with a composite laxity score from three laxity tests (anterior/posterior drawer and sulcus tests). Single plane dynamic fluoroscopy captured joint motion with 2D-3D joint registration to derive 3D joint kinematics. Average GH translations occurring during the laxity tests were compared between groups using an independent sample's t-test. The relationship of composite laxity scores to overall translations was examined with a simple linear regression. Differences of each laxity test translation between groups were analyzed with a two-way repeated measures ANOVA.ResultsMean composite translations for swimmers were 1.7 mm greater (p = 0.04, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.1, 3.3 mm) compared to controls. A moderate association occurred (r2 = 0.40, p = 0.005) between composite laxity scores and composite translation. Greater translations for the posterior drawer (-2.4 mm, p = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.1, -4.6) and sulcus tests (-2.7 mm, p = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.3, -5.0) existed in swimmers compared to controls.ConclusionSignificant differences in composite translation existed between symptomatic swimmers with MDI and asymptomatic control participants without MDI during GH joint laxity tests. The results provide initial biomechanically based construct validity for the clinical criteria used to identify individuals with MDI.

Project description:Objective To identify transcript level differences between traumatic and degenerative tears of tendon tissues in shoulder joint using RNA-seq. Methods Tendon tissues were isolated from female and male patients with traumatic or degenerative tears during arthroscopic surgery (N = 31). Differentially expressed transcript were identified and biological processes enriched in traumatic and degenerative tears were probed computationally. Expression pattern of selected transcripts was validated by real-time qPCR. Results We identified 339 and 336 transcripts differentially expressed between traumatic and degenerative tears in females and males respectively at a fold-change greater than |2| and a p-value  0.05. In females, GSTM1, MT1G, S1008A, ACSM3, DSC, FAM110C and VNN2 were the most prominent transcripts elevated in traumatic tears and CHAD, CLEC3A, IBSP, TNMD, APLNR, and CPA3 were most highly repressed in traumatic tears. Transcripts elevated in traumatic tears represented catabolic processes, immune response, and metabolic processes while those repressed in traumatic tears represented tissue morphogenesis and developmental processes, angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix organization. In males, ELOA3B, CXCL8, ADM, TNS4 and SPOCK1 were the most prominent transcripts elevated in traumatic tears and MYL2, TNNC1, MB, CPA3, APLNR, and CA3 were most highly repressed in traumatic tears. Transcripts elevated in traumatic tears represented localization of endoplasmic reticulum, chromosome organization, leukocyte/neutrophil degranulation, and protein transport whereas those repressed in traumatic tears represented muscle development, blood circulation (angiogenesis), and muscle cell differentiation. Numerous novel lncRNAs were also identified to be differentially expressed between traumatic and degenerative tears in both sexes. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance This study improves our molecular understanding of tendon tissues in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy based on underlying etiology (trauma and degeneration). It also provides new insights into sex-based transcript differences that may help drive clinical decision making in female and male patients with traumatic and degenerative shoulder injuries.

Project description:BackgroundThe physical examination is one of the cornerstones of the diagnostic process in patients with acute shoulder injuries. The discriminative properties of a given examination test depend both on its validity and reliability. The aim of the present study was to assess the interrater reliability of 13 physical examination manoeuvres for acute rotator cuff tears in patients with acute soft tissue shoulder injuries.MethodsIn a large walk-in orthopaedic emergency department, 120 consecutive patients ≥40 years of age were included in a diagnostic study. Patients who had follow-up within three weeks of an acute shoulder injury without fracture on radiographs were eligible. Four emergency department physicians participated as examiners. In a subset of 48 patients, the physical examination tests were performed by two physicians, randomly chosen by their work rotation. The physicians were blinded to the findings of each other and the results of the ultrasound screening. The interrater reliability was assessed by Cohen's kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and Bland-Altman plots depending on whether the examination test result was registered as a binary, ordered categorical or continuous numerical variable.ResultsThe median age was 55.5 years, 46% were female. Twenty-seven percent had a rotator cuff full-thickness tear on ultrasound screening; all but one involved the supraspinatus tendon. Cohen's kappa for binary tests ranged from excellent to fair. Excellent agreement (kappa > 0.8) was found for the inability to abduct above 90° and abduction strength. External rotation strength expressed substantial agreement (kappa 0.7). The lowest scores were registered for Hawkins` test and the external rotation lag sign (kappa 0.25 and 0.40, respectively). The ICCs for active range of abduction and external rotation were 0.93 (0.88-0.96) and 0.84 (0.72-0.91), whereas the SEM was 15 and 9, respectively.ConclusionsThe results indicate that examination manoeuvres assessing abduction and external rotation range of motion and strength are more reliable than manoeuvres assessing pain in patients in the acute phase of traumatic shoulder injury. The poor agreement observed is likely to limit the validity in the present setting of two commonly used tests.Trial registrationThe Norwegian Regional Ethics Committee South East ( 2015/195 ).

Project description:Objective: To identify transcript level differences between traumatic and degenerative tears of subacromial bursal tissues in shoulder joint using RNA-seq. Methods: Bursal tissues were collected from female and male patients with traumatic or degenerative tears during arthroscopic surgery (N=32). Differentially expressed transcript between traumatic and degenerative tears were detected by RNA-seq and biological processes were identified computationally. RNA-seq results were selectively validated by real-time qPCR. Results: We identified 334 protein-coding transcripts differentially expressed between traumatic and degenerative tears in females and 167 in males at a fold-change greater than |2| and a P < 0.05. In females, XIRP2, MYL1, MYBPC1, TNNT1, and LMOD2, were the highly expressed in traumatic tears and TPSD1, CDSN, RCVRN, LTBP4, and PTGS1 were prominently repressed in traumatic tears. Transcripts elevated in traumatic tears represented muscle cell differentiation and development, and muscle contraction whereas those elevated in degenerative tears represented cell activation, neutrophil granulation, immune response, and protein transport. In males, AZGP1, CNTFR, COL9A1, ZNF98 and EREG were highly elevated in traumatic tears whereas MYL2, HOXD11, SLC6A7, CADM1, and MMP17 were most highly repressed in traumatic tears. Transcripts elevated in traumatic tears represented metabolic processes, catabolic processes, and transmembrane protein transport while processes related to cell cycle were mainly repressed in traumatic tears. We also identified a number of novel lncRNAs differentially expressed between traumatic and degenerative tears in both females and males. Conclusions: This study increases our molecular understanding of bursal tissues in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy based on the nature of disease that is trauma or degeneration. These finding also provide new insights into sex-based transcript differences that could inform clinical decision making in treating patients with traumatic and degenerative shoulder injuries.

Dataset Information

Shoulder pain in primary care: diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination tests for non-traumatic acromioclavicular joint pain.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Shoulder pain in primary care: diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination tests for non-traumatic acromioclavicular joint pain.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets