Dataset Information

Impact of procedure volumes and focused practice on short-term outcomes of elective and urgent colon cancer resection in Italy.

ABSTRACT: The relationship between hospital volumes and short-term patients' outcomes of colon cancer (CC) surgery is not well established in the literature. Moreover, evidence about short-term outcomes of urgent compared with elective CC procedures is scanty. The aims of this study are 1) to determine whether caseloads and other hospital characteristics are associated with short-term outcomes of CC surgery; 2) to compare the outcomes of urgent and elective CC surgery.A total of 14,200 patients undergoing CC surgery between 2005 and 2010 in the General Surgery Units (GSUs) of the hospitals of Emilia-Romagna region, Northern Italy, were identified from the hospital discharge records database. The outcomes of interest were 30-day in-hospital mortality, re-intervention and 30-day re-admission. Using multilevel analysis, we analyzed the relationship of GSU volumes and focused practice, defined as the percentage of CC operations over total operations, with the three outcomes.High procedure volumes were associated with a lower risk of 30-day in-hospital mortality, after adjusting for patients' characteristics [aOR (95% CI)?=?0.51 (0.33-0.81)]. Stratified analyses for elective and urgent surgery showed that high volumes were associated with a lower 30-day mortality for elective patients [aOR (95% CI)?=?0.35 (0.17-0.71)], but not for urgent patients [aOR (95% CI)?=?0.72 (0.42-1.24)]. Focused practice was an independent predictor of re-intervention [aOR (95% CI)?=?0.67 (0.47-0.97)] and re-admission [aRR (95% CI)?=?0.88 (0.78-0.98)].The present study adds evidence in support of the notion that patients with CC undergoing surgery at high-volume and focused surgical units experience better short-term outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Lenzi J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3656123 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impact of procedure volumes and focused practice on short-term outcomes of elective and urgent colon cancer resection in Italy.

Lenzi Jacopo J Lombardi Raffaele R Gori Davide D Zanini Nicola N Tedesco Dario D Masetti Michele M Jovine Elio E Fantini Maria Pia MP

PloS one 20130516 5

<h4>Background</h4>The relationship between hospital volumes and short-term patients' outcomes of colon cancer (CC) surgery is not well established in the literature. Moreover, evidence about short-term outcomes of urgent compared with elective CC procedures is scanty. The aims of this study are 1) to determine whether caseloads and other hospital characteristics are associated with short-term outcomes of CC surgery; 2) to compare the outcomes of urgent and elective CC surgery.<h4>Methods</h4>A ...[more]

PMID: 23696873

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background & aimsGiven the risk of intestinal resection for Crohn's disease, postoperative treatment may be informed by several risk factors, including resection type. We compared postoperative treatment strategies for Crohn's disease between emergent/urgent versus elective resection.MethodsWe identified patients with intestinal resection for Crohn's disease between 2002-2018 using the MarketScan databases. We classified emergent/urgent resections as those occurring after emergency department admission or after the second day of admission. We estimated adjusted risk differences for the association between resection type (emergent/urgent versus elective) and 6-month postoperative medication strategy (biologic monotherapy, biologic combination therapy with an immunomodulator, immunomodulator monotherapy, other non-biologic medication for Crohn's [5-aminosalicylates, antibiotics, corticosteroids], or no medications for Crohn's).ResultsDuring 6 months after resection among 4,187 patients, 23% received biologic monotherapy, 6% received combination therapy, 16% received immunomodulator monotherapy, and 36% received other non-biologics. Compared to elective resection, emergent/urgent resection was associated with more common use of "other non-biologic" medications (risk difference 6.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8%, 10.0%), but less common use of biologic monotherapy (risk difference -3.2%; 95% CI -6.2%, -0.1%) and no medications (risk difference -3.6%; 95% CI -6.6%, -0.6%).ConclusionsAlthough patients with emergent/urgent resection may benefit from more aggressive postoperative therapy, there was evidence that emergent/urgent resection was more associated than elective resection with postoperative use of non-biologics for Crohn's disease. Future studies of treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness of postoperative treatment strategies for Crohn's patients should consider these differences between resection types, which may be important drivers of longer-term outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundColorectal cancer stands as a prevalent cause of cancer-related mortality, necessitating effective treatment strategies. Acute colonic obstruction occurs in approximately 20% of patients and represents a surgical emergency with substantial morbidity and mortality. The optimal approach for managing left-sided colon cancer with acute colonic obstruction remains debatable, with no consensus on whether emergency resection or bridge-to-surgery, involving initial decompressing stoma and subsequent elective resection after recovery, should be employed. Current studies show a decrease in morbidity and short-term mortality for the bridge-to-surgery approach, yet it remains unclear if the long-term oncological outcome is equivalent to emergency resection.MethodsThis prospective, randomized, multicenter trial aims to investigate the management of obstructive left-sided colon cancer in a comprehensive manner. The study will be conducted across 26 university hospitals and 40 academic hospitals in Germany. A total of 468 patients will be enrolled, providing a cohort of 420 evaluable patients, with an equal distribution of 210 patients in each treatment arm. Patients with left-sided colon cancer, defined as cancer between the left splenic flexure and > 12 cm ab ano and obstruction confirmed by X-ray or CT scan, are eligible. Randomization will be performed in a 1:1 ratio, assigning patients either to the oncological emergency resection group or the bridge-to-surgery group, wherein patients will undergo diverting stoma and subsequent elective oncological resection after recovery. The primary endpoint of this trial will be 120-day mortality, allowing for consideration of the time interval between diverting stoma and resection.DiscussionThe findings derived from this trial possess the potential to reshape the current clinical approach of emergency resection for obstructive left-sided colon cancer by favoring the bridge-to-surgery practice, provided that a reduction in morbidity can be achieved without compromising the oncological long-term outcome.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) under the identifier DRKS00031827. Registered on May 15, 2023.Protocol28.04.2023, protocol version 2.0F.

Project description:BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had, and still has, a profound impact on national health systems, altering trajectories of care and exacerbating existing inequalities in health. Postponement of surgeries and cancellation of elective surgical procedures have been reported worldwide. In Italy, the lock-down measures following the COVID-19 pandemic caused cancellations of surgical procedures and important backlogs; little is known about potential social inequalities in the recovery process that occurred during the post-lockdown period. This study aims at evaluating whether all population social strata benefited equally from the surgical volumes' recovery in four large Italian regions.MethodsThis multicentre cohort study covers a population of approximately 11 million people. To assess if social inequalities exist in the recovery of eight indicators of elective and oncological surgery, we estimated Risk Ratios (RR) through Poisson models, comparing the incidence proportions of events recorded during COVID-19 (2020-21) with those in pre-pandemic years (2018-19) for each pandemic period and educational level.ResultsCompared to 2018-19, volumes of elective surgery showed a U-shape with the most significant drops during the second wave or the vaccination phase. The recovery was socially unequal. At the end of 2021, incidence proportions among highly educated people generally exceeded the expected ones; RRs were 1.31 (95%CI 1.21-1.42), 1.24 (95%CI 1.17-1.23), 1.17 (95%CI 1.08-1.26) for knee and hip replacement and prostatic surgery, respectively. Among low educated patients, RR remained always < 1. Oncological surgery indicators showed a similar social gradient. Whereas volumes were preserved among the highly educated, the low educated were still lagging behind at the end of 2021.ConclusionsSurgical procedures generally returned to pre-pandemic levels but the low educated experienced the slowest recovery. An equity-oriented appraisal of trends in healthcare provision should be included in pandemic preparedness plans, to ensure that social inequalities are promptly recognised and tackled.

Dataset Information

Impact of procedure volumes and focused practice on short-term outcomes of elective and urgent colon cancer resection in Italy.

Publications

Impact of procedure volumes and focused practice on short-term outcomes of elective and urgent colon cancer resection in Italy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets