Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations associated with first-line stavudine-containing antiretroviral therapy: programmatic implications for countries phasing out stavudine.


ABSTRACT: The World Health Organization Antiretroviral Treatment Guidelines recommend phasing-out stavudine because of its risk of long-term toxicity. There are two mutational pathways of stavudine resistance with different implications for zidovudine and tenofovir cross-resistance, the primary candidates for replacing stavudine. However, because resistance testing is rarely available in resource-limited settings, it is critical to identify the cross-resistance patterns associated with first-line stavudine failure.We analyzed HIV-1 resistance mutations following first-line stavudine failure from 35 publications comprising 1,825 individuals. We also assessed the influence of concomitant nevirapine vs. efavirenz, therapy duration, and HIV-1 subtype on the proportions of mutations associated with zidovudine vs. tenofovir cross-resistance.Mutations with preferential zidovudine activity, K65R or K70E, occurred in 5.3% of individuals. Mutations with preferential tenofovir activity, ? two thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) or Q151M, occurred in 22% of individuals. Nevirapine increased the risk of TAMs, K65R, and Q151M. Longer therapy increased the risk of TAMs and Q151M but not K65R. Subtype C and CRF01_AE increased the risk of K65R, but only CRF01_AE increased the risk of K65R without Q151M.Regardless of concomitant nevirapine vs. efavirenz, therapy duration, or subtype, tenofovir was more likely than zidovudine to retain antiviral activity following first-line d4T therapy.

SUBMITTER: Tang MW 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3657117 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations associated with first-line stavudine-containing antiretroviral therapy: programmatic implications for countries phasing out stavudine.

Tang Michele W MW   Rhee Soo-Yon SY   Bertagnolio Silvia S   Ford Nathan N   Holmes Susan S   Sigaloff Kim C KC   Hamers Raph L RL   de Wit Tobias F Rinke TF   Fleury Herve J HJ   Kanki Phyllis J PJ   Ruxrungtham Kiat K   Hawkins Claudia A CA   Wallis Carole L CL   Stevens Wendy W   van Zyl Gert U GU   Manosuthi Weerawat W   Hosseinipour Mina C MC   Ngo-Giang-Huong Nicole N   Belec Laurent L   Peeters Martine M   Aghokeng Avelin A   Bunupuradah Torsak T   Burda Sherri S   Cane Patricia P   Cappelli Giulia G   Charpentier Charlotte C   Dagnra Anoumou Y AY   Deshpande Alaka K AK   El-Katib Ziad Z   Eshleman Susan H SH   Fokam Joseph J   Gody Jean-Chrysostome JC   Katzenstein David D   Koyalta Donato D DD   Kumwenda Johnstone J JJ   Lallemant Marc M   Lynen Lutgarde L   Marconi Vincent C VC   Margot Nicolas A NA   Moussa Sandrine S   Ndung'u Thumbi T   Nyambi Phillipe N PN   Orrell Catherine C   Schapiro Jonathan M JM   Schuurman Rob R   Sirivichayakul Sunee S   Smith Davey D   Zolfo Maria M   Jordan Michael R MR   Shafer Robert W RW  

The Journal of infectious diseases 20130601


<h4>Background</h4>The World Health Organization Antiretroviral Treatment Guidelines recommend phasing-out stavudine because of its risk of long-term toxicity. There are two mutational pathways of stavudine resistance with different implications for zidovudine and tenofovir cross-resistance, the primary candidates for replacing stavudine. However, because resistance testing is rarely available in resource-limited settings, it is critical to identify the cross-resistance patterns associated with  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4274127 | biostudies-literature