Dataset Information

Analyses of hospital administrative data that use diagnosis codes overestimate the cases of acute pancreatitis.

ABSTRACT:

Background & aims

Although widely used, little information exists on the validity of using hospital administrative data to code acute pancreatitis (AP). We sought to determine if discharge diagnosis codes accurately identify patients whose clinical course met the standard for AP diagnosis.

Methods

We analyzed data from 401 unique patients admitted through the emergency department who received a primary inpatient discharge diagnosis of AP at 2 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center hospitals in the years 2000, 2002, and 2005. Each patient was matched with a control patient who was admitted with abdominal pain and then discharged without a diagnosis of AP. Patients were matched based on demographics, testing for serum levels of pancreatic enzymes, year of visit to the emergency department, admission to the intensive care unit, and performance of abdominal computed tomography scan. The standard used to diagnose AP was the presence of 2 of 3 features (abdominal pain, ? 3-fold increase in serum levels of pancreatic enzymes, and positive results from imaging analysis).

Results

The median age of AP cases was 53 years (interquartile range, 41.5-67 years); 47.1% were male, 85% were white. The most common etiologies were biliary (33.4%), alcohol-associated (16.2%), and idiopathic (24.2%). Serum levels of pancreatic enzymes were increased by any amount, and by ? 3-fold, in 95.3% and 68.6% of patients diagnosed with AP and in 16.2% and 2.2% of controls, respectively. The standard for diagnosis of AP was met in 80% of cases diagnosed with this disorder; they had no history of pancreatitis. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the AP diagnosis code were 96%, 85%, 80%, and 98%, respectively.

Conclusions

Approximately 1 of 5 patients diagnosed with AP upon discharge from the hospital do not meet the guidelines for diagnosis of this disorder. Efforts should be made to more consistently use guidelines for AP diagnosis.

SUBMITTER: Saligram S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3662547 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Analyses of hospital administrative data that use diagnosis codes overestimate the cases of acute pancreatitis.

Saligram Shreyas S Lo David D Saul Melissa M Yadav Dhiraj D

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 20120410 7

<h4>Background & aims</h4>Although widely used, little information exists on the validity of using hospital administrative data to code acute pancreatitis (AP). We sought to determine if discharge diagnosis codes accurately identify patients whose clinical course met the standard for AP diagnosis.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed data from 401 unique patients admitted through the emergency department who received a primary inpatient discharge diagnosis of AP at 2 University of Pittsburgh Medical Cente ...[more]

PMID: 22504004

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review of studies reporting on the validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for identifying stroke in administrative data.MethodsMEDLINE and EMBASE were searched (inception to February 2015) for studies: (a) Using administrative data to identify stroke; or (b) Evaluating the validity of stroke codes in administrative data; and (c) Reporting validation statistics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), or Kappa scores) for stroke, or data sufficient for their calculation. Additional articles were located by hand search (up to February 2015) of original papers. Studies solely evaluating codes for transient ischaemic attack were excluded. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers; article quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.ResultsSeventy-seven studies published from 1976-2015 were included. The sensitivity of ICD-9 430-438/ICD-10 I60-I69 for any cerebrovascular disease was ? 82% in most [? 50%] studies, and specificity and NPV were both ? 95%. The PPV of these codes for any cerebrovascular disease was ? 81% in most studies, while the PPV specifically for acute stroke was ? 68%. In at least 50% of studies, PPVs were ? 93% for subarachnoid haemorrhage (ICD-9 430/ICD-10 I60), 89% for intracerebral haemorrhage (ICD-9 431/ICD-10 I61), and 82% for ischaemic stroke (ICD-9 434/ICD-10 I63 or ICD-9 434&436). For in-hospital deaths, sensitivity was 55%. For cerebrovascular disease or acute stroke as a cause-of-death on death certificates, sensitivity was ? 71% in most studies while PPV was ? 87%.ConclusionsWhile most cases of prevalent cerebrovascular disease can be detected using 430-438/I60-I69 collectively, acute stroke must be defined using more specific codes. Most in-hospital deaths and death certificates with stroke as a cause-of-death correspond to true stroke deaths. Linking vital statistics and hospitalization data may improve the ascertainment of fatal stroke.

Project description:BackgroundLarge, population-based administrative healthcare databases can be used to identify patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) when serum creatinine laboratory results are unavailable. We examined the validity of algorithms that used combined hospital encounter and physician claims database codes for the detection of CKD in Ontario, Canada.MethodsWe accrued 123,499 patients over the age of 65 from 2007 to 2010. All patients had a baseline serum creatinine value to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We developed an algorithm of physician claims and hospital encounter codes to search administrative databases for the presence of CKD. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of this algorithm to detect our primary threshold of CKD, an eGFR <45 mL/min per 1.73 m² (15.4% of patients). We also assessed serum creatinine and eGFR values in patients with and without CKD codes (algorithm positive and negative, respectively).ResultsOur algorithm required evidence of at least one of eleven CKD codes and 7.7% of patients were algorithm positive. The sensitivity was 32.7% [95% confidence interval: (95% CI): 32.0 to 33.3%]. Sensitivity was lower in women compared to men (25.7 vs. 43.7%; p <0.001) and in the oldest age category (over 80 vs. 66 to 80; 28.4 vs. 37.6 %; p < 0.001). All specificities were over 94%. The positive and negative predictive values were 65.4% (95% CI: 64.4 to 66.3%) and 88.8% (95% CI: 88.6 to 89.0%), respectively. In algorithm positive patients, the median [interquartile range (IQR)] baseline serum creatinine value was 135 μmol/L (106 to 179 μmol/L) compared to 82 μmol/L (69 to 98 μmol/L) for algorithm negative patients. Corresponding eGFR values were 38 mL/min per 1.73 m² (26 to 51 mL/min per 1.73 m²) vs. 69 mL/min per 1.73 m² (56 to 82 mL/min per 1.73 m²), respectively.ConclusionsPatients with CKD as identified by our database algorithm had distinctly higher baseline serum creatinine values and lower eGFR values than those without such codes. However, because of limited sensitivity, the prevalence of CKD was underestimated.

Dataset Information

Analyses of hospital administrative data that use diagnosis codes overestimate the cases of acute pancreatitis.

Background & aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Analyses of hospital administrative data that use diagnosis codes overestimate the cases of acute pancreatitis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets