Dataset Information

Use of the modified SNOT-16 in primary care patients with clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis.

ABSTRACT: To determine the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal important difference (MID) for the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16) in the measurement of disease-specific quality of life (QOL) in adults with acute rhinosinusitis.Randomized controlled trial to evaluate antibiotic treatment for acute rhinosinusitis.Ten community practices in St Louis, Missouri.The modified SNOT-16 was completed at baseline (by both face-to-face and telephone interviews) and by telephone interview at 3, 7, and 10 days by 166 adults with acute rhinosinusitis diagnosed clinically using standardized criteria (36% were male, 78% were white). Considering severity and frequency, patients rated how much they were bothered by each item using a 4-point scale. The mean SNOT-16 score (ranging from 0 [no problem] to 3 [large problem]) was compared with the patients' global assessment of change to evaluate responsiveness and the MID.The instrument was easy to use and took less than 5 minutes to complete. The SNOT-16 score identified statistically significant differences in the hypothesized direction for those reporting more or less severe symptoms (P = .02) and more or less bother (P < .001) demonstrating construct-related validity. The Cronbach ? ranged from 0.82 to 0.91, demonstrating high internal consistency. There was a statistically significant decrease in scores with time (multivariate analysis of variance, P < .001). The effect sizes at days 3, 7, and 10 were 1.45, 2.34, and 2.90, respectively, indicating high sensitivity to clinical change. The MID was 0.5 units.The modified SNOT-16 is a valid instrument to assess effectiveness of interventions to improve disease-specific QOL in adults with acute rhinosinusitis.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00377403.

SUBMITTER: Garbutt J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3671945 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Use of the modified SNOT-16 in primary care patients with clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis.

Garbutt Jane J Spitznagel Edward E Piccirillo Jay J

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery 20110801 8

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal important difference (MID) for the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 (SNOT-16) in the measurement of disease-specific quality of life (QOL) in adults with acute rhinosinusitis.<h4>Study design</h4>Randomized controlled trial to evaluate antibiotic treatment for acute rhinosinusitis.<h4>Setting</h4>Ten community practices in St Louis, Missouri.<h4>Methods</h4>The modified SNOT-16 was completed at baseline (by both f ...[more]

PMID: 21844413

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objectives/hypothesisPrevious studies have shown declines in productivity due to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are correlated with disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL) measures. However, it is unclear which symptom domains contribute primarily to productivity loss. This investigation sought to assess the association between CRS-specific QOL subdomain impairment and productivity loss.Study designProspective, multi-institutional, observational cohort study.MethodsThere were 198 patients with refractory CRS enrolled between August 2012 and June 2015. Baseline QOL measures were obtained across five subdomains of the 22-item SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Lost productivity time was determined from patient-reported measures of annual absenteeism, presenteeism, and lost leisure time, and then monetized using annual daily wage rates from the 2012 US National Census and 2013 Department of Labor statistics.ResultsProductivity losses correlated with impairments in both SNOT-22 psychological dysfunction (Spearman correlation coefficient [Rs] = 0.428, P < .001), and sleep dysfunction domain scores (Rs = 0.355, P < .001). Higher SNOT-22 total scores also significantly correlated with increased monetized productivity losses (Rs = 0.366, P < .001). The mean annual productivity cost was $11,820/patient, whereas patients with comorbid immunodeficiency ($23,285/patient), tobacco use ($23,195/patient), and steroid dependency ($18,910/patient) reported higher than average annual productivity costs. Multivariate linear regression found maximum annual productivity costs in adjusted psychological ($13,300/patient, P < .001) and sleep dysfunction ($9,275/patient, P < .001) domains.ConclusionsImpairments in sleep and psychological SNOT-22 domains correlate with productivity losses. Patients with comorbid immunodeficiency, smoking, and steroid dependency had higher than average productivity losses. Targeted management of psychological and sleep dysfunction in combination with standard symptom control may improve patient-centered care and reduce the annual economic burden of CRS.Level of evidence2c. Laryngoscope, 128:23-30, 2018.

Project description:Objectives/hypothesisThe 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) is a validated chronic rhinosinusitis health-related quality-of-life outcome (HRQoL) measure; however, SNOT-22 domains have not been validated specifically for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).Study designValidation of SNOT-22 domain structure, using data from 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter clinical trials of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe CRSwNP.MethodsPreliminary dimensional structure was derived by exploratory factor analyses of SNOT-22 data from a phase 2 trial (NCT01920893) of dupilumab for the treatment of CRSwNP. Data from 2 phase 3 clinical trials (NCT02912468 and NCT02898454) were then used for confirmatory factor analysis, and evaluated for reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. In all three trials, the SNOT-22 was administered electronically on a tablet and trial participants were required to answer all items.ResultsFactor analysis supported five domains: Nasal, Ear/Facial, Sleep, Function, and Emotion. Correlations between domains were moderate to high, ranging from 0.53 (Nasal-Emotion) to 0.88 (Function-Sleep). Construct validity was mostly supported; relationships with other measures were almost always in the intended direction and magnitude. Internal consistency reliability also confirmed questionnaire structure with strong Cronbach's alpha values (all >0.80). Moderate-to-high correlations were observed between change in SNOT-22 domain scores and other study patient-reported outcome measures, along with large effect-size estimates (≥0.7), demonstrating responsiveness of the Nasal, Sleep, and Function domains. Emotion and Ear/Facial domains had small-to-moderate effect sizes.ConclusionsPsychometric analyses support the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of five domains of SNOT-22 (Nasal, Ear/Facial, Sleep, Function, and Emotion) for assessing symptoms and impact on HRQoL in patients with CRSwNP. Laryngoscope, 132:933-941, 2022.

Project description:BackgroundPrior study demonstrated that baseline 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) aggregate scores accurately predict selection of surgical intervention in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Factor analysis of the SNOT-22 survey has identified five distinct domains that are differentially impacted by endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This study sought to quantify SNOT-22 domains in patient cohorts electing both surgical or medical management and postinterventional change in these domains.MethodsCRS patients were prospectively enrolled into a multi-institutional, observational cohort study. Subjects elected continued medical management or ESS. SNOT-22 domain scores at baseline were compared between treatment cohorts. Postintervention domain score changes were evaluated in subjects with at least six-month follow-up.ResultsA total of 363 subjects were enrolled with 72 (19.8%) electing continued medical management, whereas 291 (80.2%) elected ESS. Baseline SNOT-22 domain scores were comparable between treatment cohorts in sinus-specific domains (rhinologic, extranasal rhinologic, and ear/facial symptoms; p > 0.050); however, the surgical cohort reported significantly higher psychological (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 16.0 ± 8.4 vs 12.0 ± 7.1; p < 0.001) and sleep dysfunction (13.7 ± 6.8 vs 10.5 ± 6.2; p < 0.001) than the medical cohort. Effect sizes for ESS varied across domains with rhinologic and extranasal rhinologic symptoms experiencing the greatest gains (1.067 and 0.997, respectively), whereas psychological and sleep dysfunction experiencing the smallest improvements (0.805 and 0.818, respectively). Patients experienced greater mean improvements after ESS in all domains compared to medical management (p < 0.001).ConclusionSubjects electing ESS report higher sleep and psychological dysfunction compared to medical management but have comparable sinus-specific symptoms. Subjects undergoing ESS experience greater gains compared to medical management across all domains; however, these gains are smallest in the psychological and sleep domains.

Project description:BackgroundThe management and outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in primary care have not been characterized.ObjectiveTo describe 30-day outcomes stratified by initial site-of-care decisions DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study PARTICIPANTS: Adults diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in primary care in a large, diverse community-based US health system (2013-2019) MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day serious adverse events (recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality). The secondary outcome was 7-day pulmonary embolism-related hospitalization, either initial or delayed.Key resultsAmong 652 patient encounters (from 646 patients), median age was 64 years; 51.5% were male and 70.7% identified as non-Hispanic white. Overall, 134 cases (20.6%) were sent home from primary care and 518 cases (79.4%) were initially referred to the emergency department (ED) or hospital. Among the referred, 196 (37.8%) were discharged home from the ED without events. Eight patients (1.2%; 95% CI 0.5-2.4%) experienced a 30-day serious adverse event: 4 venous thromboemboli (0.6%), 1 major bleed (0.2%), and 3 deaths (0.5%). Seven of these patients were initially hospitalized, and 1 had been sent home from primary care. All 3 deaths occurred in patients with known metastatic cancer initially referred to the ED, hospitalized, then enrolled in hospice following discharge. Overall, 328 patients (50.3%) were hospitalized within 7 days: 322 at the time of the index diagnosis and 6 following initial outpatient management (4 clinic-only and 2 clinic-plus-ED patients).ConclusionsPatients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in this primary care setting uncommonly experienced 30-day adverse events, regardless of initial site-of-care decisions. Over 20% were managed comprehensively by primary care. Delayed 7-day pulmonary embolism-related hospitalization was rare among the 51% treated as outpatients. Primary care management of acute pulmonary embolism appears to be safe and could have implications for cost-effectiveness and patient care experience.

Dataset Information

Use of the modified SNOT-16 in primary care patients with clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis.

Publications

Use of the modified SNOT-16 in primary care patients with clinically diagnosed acute rhinosinusitis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets