Dataset Information

Pharmacokinetics of coadministered guanfacine extended release and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In clinical practice, α₂-adrenoceptor agonists have been adjunctively administered with psychostimulants for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Two studies have examined the adjunctive use of guanfacine extended release (GXR, Intuniv®; Shire Development LLC, Wayne, PA, USA) with psychostimulants in children and adolescents with a suboptimal response to psychostimulant treatment. However, the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between GXR and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX, Vyvanse®; Shire US LLC, Wayne, PA, USA) has not been thoroughly evaluated.

Objective

The primary objective of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of GXR 4 mg and LDX 50 mg given as single doses alone and in combination.

Study design

This was an open-label, randomized, three-period crossover, DDI study.

Setting

The study was conducted in a single clinical research center.

Participants

Forty-two healthy adults were randomized in this study.

Interventions

Subjects were administered single oral doses of GXR 4 mg, LDX 50 mg, or GXR and LDX in combination.

Main outcome measures

Blood samples collected predose and up to 72 h postdose assessed guanfacine, LDX, and d-amphetamine levels. Bioequivalence was defined as the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) falling within the bioequivalence reference interval (0.80-1.25). Safety measures included adverse events, vital signs, and electrocardiograms (ECGs).

Results

Forty subjects completed the study. Following administration of LDX alone or in combination with GXR, the statistical comparisons of the AUC0-∞ and Cmax of d-amphetamine fell entirely within the reference interval. For guanfacine, the 90% CI of the geometric mean ratio of AUC∞ for the two treatments was within the bioequivalence criteria, but for Cmax the upper bound of the 90% CI exceeded the standard range for bioequivalence by 7%. This relatively small change is unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 42.9% of subjects; the most commonly reported TEAEs included dizziness (5.0, 7.3, and 7.3%) and headache (7.5, 4.9, and 7.3%) following administration of GXR, LDX, and GXR and LDX in combination, respectively. Clinically significant ECG abnormalities occurred in one subject following administration of LDX and in one subject following coadministration of GXR and LDX.

Conclusions

In healthy adults, coadministration of GXR and LDX did not result in a clinically meaningful pharmacokinetic DDI compared with either treatment alone. No unique TEAEs were observed with coadministration of GXR and LDX compared with either treatment alone.

SUBMITTER: Roesch B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3689918 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundViloxazine extended-release is a novel nonstimulant under investigation as a potential treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Given the potential for viloxazine extended-release to be co-administered with stimulant ADHD pharmacotherapies, this trial investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of combination viloxazine extended-release + lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (lisdexamfetamine) versus viloxazine extended-release and lisdexamfetamine alone.MethodsIn this single-center, cross-over, open-label trial, healthy, non-ADHD adults received single oral doses of 700 mg viloxazine extended-release alone, 50 mg lisdexamfetamine alone, and a combination of viloxazine extended-release (700 mg) + lisdexamfetamine (50 mg), with blood samples collected over 4 days postadministration. The active drug in viloxazine extended-release (viloxazine) and primary metabolite of lisdexamfetamine (d-amphetamine) were measured using chromatographic tandem mass spectrometry. Safety assessments included adverse events, vital signs, echocardiograms, and clinical laboratory evaluations.ResultsThirty-six adults were enrolled, and 34 completed the trial. The least squares geometric mean ratios are reported as [combination / single drug (90% confidence intervals)]. Viloxazine extended-release: Cmax = 95.96% (91.33-100.82), area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to the last measurable time (AUC0-t) = 99.19% (96.53-101.91), and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUCinf) = 99.23% (96.61-101.93). Lisdexamfetamine: Cmax = 112.78% (109.93-115.71), AUC0-t = 109.64% (105.25-114.22), and AUCinf = 109.52% (105.19-114.03). All reported adverse events, except 1 (moderate vomiting), were mild in severity.ConclusionsCo-administration of viloxazine extended-release and lisdexamfetamine did not impact the pharmacokinetics of viloxazine or d-amphetamine relative to administration of either drug alone. After single dose administration, the combination appeared to be safe and well tolerated.

Project description:Backgroundα2-Adrenoceptor agonists are used adjunctively to psychostimulants in treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) when psychostimulants alone do not sufficiently reduce symptoms. However, data on the pharmacokinetic profiles and safety of combination treatments in ADHD are needed.ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of guanfacine extended release (GXR) and methylphenidate hydrochloride (MPH) extended release, alone and in combination.Study designThis was an open-label, randomized, three-period crossover, drug-drug interaction study.SettingThe study was conducted at a single clinical research center.ParticipantsThirty-eight healthy adults were randomized in this study.InterventionsSubjects were administered single oral doses of GXR (Intuniv(®); Shire Development LLC, Wayne, PA, USA) 4 mg, MPH (Concerta(®); McNeil Pediatrics, Titusville, NJ, USA) 36 mg, or GXR and MPH combined.Main outcome measuresGuanfacine, dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH), and l-methylphenidate (l-MPH) levels were measured with blood samples collected predose and up to 72 h postdose. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and electrocardiograms (ECGs).ResultsThirty-five subjects completed the study. Analyses of the 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios of the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) values for guanfacine and d-MPH following administration of GXR or MPH alone or combined met strict bioequivalence criteria (90 % CIs within the interval of 0.80-1.25). Overall, combining GXR and MPH did not alter the pharmacokinetic parameters of either medication. Sixteen subjects (42.1 %) had at least one TEAE. The most commonly reported TEAEs included headache and dizziness following GXR, MPH, and GXR and MPH combined. Two subjects had clinically significant abnormalities in ECG results following coadministration: both events were mild and resolved the same day.ConclusionsIn this short-term, open-label study of healthy adults, coadministration of GXR and MPH did not result in significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. No unique TEAEs were observed with coadministration of GXR and MPH compared with either treatment alone.

Project description:Background and objectivesViloxazine extended-release (viloxazine ER, SPN-812) is a novel non-stimulant with activity at serotonin receptors and the norepinephrine transporter, which is under investigation as a potential treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Given the potential for viloxazine ER to be coadministered with other pharmacotherapies, this trial investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of combination viloxazine ER + methylphenidate versus viloxazine ER or methylphenidate alone.MethodsIn this single-center, crossover, open-label trial, healthy adult participants received oral administration of 700 mg viloxazine ER alone, 36 mg methylphenidate alone, and combination viloxazine ER (700 mg) + methylphenidate (36 mg), with blood samples collected over 4 days post-administration. The active drug in viloxazine ER (viloxazine) and methylphenidate was measured using chromatographic tandem mass spectrometry. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, echocardiograms, and clinical laboratory evaluations.ResultsOf 36 healthy adults who were enrolled, 34 completed the trial. The geometric least squares mean ratios are reported as [combination/single drug (90% confidence intervals)]. For viloxazine ER, maximum measured plasma concentration (Cmax) = 100.98% (96.21-105.99), area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable time (AUCt) = 98.62% (96.21-101.08), and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) = 98.96% (96.55-101.44). For methylphenidate, Cmax = 103.55% (97.42-110.07), AUCt = 106.67% (101.01-112.64), and AUC∞ = 106.61% (100.99-112.54). All reported AEs were mild in severity.ConclusionsCoadministration of viloxazine ER and methylphenidate did not impact the pharmacokinetics of viloxazine or methylphenidate relative to administration of either drug alone. The combination appeared to be safe and well tolerated.

Project description:BackgroundLisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), a prodrug consisting of d-amphetamine and l-lysine, is being studied in clinical trials of major depressive disorder. Additional drug-drug interaction studies were warranted.ObjectiveThis study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics and safety of LDX and venlafaxine extended-release (VXR), alone or combined.Study designThe study was an open-label, two-arm, single-sequence crossover investigation with randomization to treatment sequence.Setting and participantsThe study was conducted at two clinical study centres and included healthy adult males and females (18-45 years of age).InterventionThe study included two single-sequence crossover designs: LDX alone followed by LDX + VXR (Treatment Arm A); and VXR alone followed by VXR + LDX (Treatment Arm B). Drug treatment was initiated on day 1 with once-daily LDX or VXR alone with 15 days' titration to final dose (LDX 30, 50 and 70 mg for 5 days each; VXR 75, 150 and 225 mg for 5 days each). On days 16-30, VXR, titrated to a final dose of 225 mg, or LDX, titrated to a final dose of 70 mg, was coadministered for participants in Treatment Arm A or B, respectively. On days 31-38, VXR doses were tapered.Main outcome measuresOn days 1-2, 15-16 and 30-31, safety evaluations and blood samples were obtained pre-dose through 24 h post-dose for analysis of LDX, d-amphetamine, venlafaxine (VEN), and O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV). Combination treatment was considered bioequivalent to single treatment if 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of analytes fell within the interval 0.80-1.25 based on maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time of last measurable concentration (AUCτ). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), pulse rate and blood pressure (BP), clinical laboratory assessments, and 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG).ResultsAmong 80 enrolled subjects, 77 were included in pharmacokinetic and safety analyses. Combination LDX + VXR was bioequivalent to LDX alone, based on exposure to d-amphetamine (GMR [95 % CI], Cmax (ng/mL): 0.97 [0.82, 1.14], AUCτ: 0.95 [0.81, 1.12]). Exposure to VEN with LDX + VXR (vs. VXR alone) was increased (Cmax: 1.10 [0.88, 1.38], AUCτ: 1.13 [0.88, 1.45]) and ODV decreased (Cmax: 0.91 [0.77, 1.06], AUCτ: 0.83 [0.71, 0.96]), whereas composite VEN + ODV was bioequivalent to VXR alone (Cmax: 0.96 [0.84, 1.09], AUCτ: 0.98 [0.85, 1.13]). TEAEs with LDX or LDX + VXR were similar. Maximum mean increases from baseline were: pulse rate, +8.73 to 12.76 beats/min with either treatment alone and +17.67 to 20.85 beats/min with LDX + VXR; systolic BP, +4.32 to 6.56 mmHg with either treatment alone and +12.96 to 13.78 mmHg with LDX + VXR; diastolic BP, +5.39 to 5.74 mmHg with either treatment alone and +12.09 to 12.46 mmHg with LDX + VXR. One participant was withdrawn due to a serious TEAE (presyncope). No unexpected, clinically meaningful trends or changes from baseline in mean laboratory or ECG parameters were observed during the trial.ConclusionIn healthy adults, combination LDX + VXR (vs. LDX alone) did not alter exposure to d-amphetamine. Although small changes in exposure to VEN (increased) and ODV (decreased) were seen with combination treatment, total VEN + ODV exposure showed no change (vs. VEN alone). LDX + VXR led to increases in BP and pulse rate, supporting existing recommendations for vital sign monitoring when using these medications.

Project description:Children/adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may have a poor or inadequate response to psychostimulants or be unable to tolerate their side-effects; furthermore, stimulants may be inappropriate because of co-existing conditions. Only one non-stimulant ADHD pharmacotherapy, the noradrenaline transporter inhibitor atomoxetine, is currently approved for use in Europe. We review recent advances in understanding of the pathophysiology of ADHD with a focus on the roles of catecholamine receptors in context of the ?2A-adrenergic receptor agonist guanfacine extended release (GXR), a new non-stimulant treatment option in Europe. Neuroimaging studies of children/adolescents with ADHD show impaired brain maturation, and structural and functional anomalies in brain regions and networks. Neurobiological studies in ADHD and medication response patterns support involvement of monoaminergic neurotransmitters (primarily dopamine and noradrenaline). Guanfacine is a selective ?2A-adrenergic receptor agonist that has been shown to improve prefrontal cortical cognitive function, including working memory. The hypothesized mode of action of guanfacine centres on direct stimulation of post-synaptic ?2A-adrenergic receptors to enhance noradrenaline neurotransmission. Preclinical data suggest that guanfacine also influences dendritic spine growth and maturation. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of GXR in ADHD, and it is approved as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to stimulants in Canada and the USA (for children and adolescents). GXR was approved recently in Europe for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents for whom stimulants are not suitable, not tolerated or have been shown to be ineffective. GXR may provide particular benefit for children/adolescents who have specific co-morbidities such as chronic tic disorders or oppositional defiant disorder (or oppositional symptoms) that have failed to respond to first-line treatment options.

Project description:ObjectiveThis is a feasibility study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and potential anxiolytic efficacy of the α2 agonist guanfacine extended-release (GXR) in children and adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), separation anxiety disorder (SAD), or social phobia/social anxiety disorder.MethodsYouth aged 6-17 years with a primary diagnosis of GAD, SAD, and/or social anxiety disorder were treated with flexibly dosed GXR (1-6 mg daily, n = 62) or placebo (n = 21) for 12 weeks. The primary aim of this study was to determine the safety and tolerability of GXR in youth with anxiety disorders, which involved the analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), the emergence of suicidal ideation and behaviors, vital signs, and electrocardiographic/laboratory parameters. Exploratory efficacy measures included dimensional anxiety scales (Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale [PARS] and Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders [SCARED]), as well as the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. As this was an exploratory study, no inferential statistical analyses were performed.ResultsGXR was safe and well tolerated. Treatment-related mean ± standard deviation changes in heart rate (GXR: 1.8 ± 12 beats per minute [bpm] decrease; placebo: 0.5 ± 11 bpm decrease), systolic blood pressure (GXR: 2.3 ± 11 mm Hg decrease; placebo: 1.7 ± 11 mm Hg decrease), or diastolic blood pressure (GXR: 1.3 ± 9 mm Hg decrease; placebo: 0.9 ± 7 mm Hg increase) were similar between treatment groups. TEAEs, including headache, somnolence/fatigue, abdominal pain, and dizziness, were consistent with the known safety profile of GXR. No differences were observed between treatment groups for PARS and SCARED scores, although at endpoint, a higher proportion of subjects receiving GXR versus placebo demonstrated CGI-I scores ≤2 (54.2% vs. 31.6%), as rated by the clinician investigator.ConclusionsGXR was well tolerated in pediatric subjects with GAD, SAD, and/or social anxiety disorder. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01470469.

Project description:BackgroundThis open-label, crossover study examined lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) and D-amphetamine pharmacokinetics in healthy adults after administration of an intact LDX capsule or after the capsule was emptied into orange juice or yogurt and the contents consumed.MethodsHealthy adult volunteers (N = 30) were administered a 70-mg LDX capsule or the contents of a 70-mg capsule mixed with yogurt or orange juice using a 3-way crossover design. Blood samples were collected serially for up to 96 hours after dose. Pharmacokinetic endpoints included maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) or to last assessment (AUClast). Relative LDX and D-amphetamine bioavailabilities from the contents of a 70-mg LDX capsule mixed with orange juice or yogurt were compared with those from the intact LDX capsule using bioequivalence-testing procedures.ResultsGeometric least squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for D-amphetamine (active moiety) were within the prespecified bioequivalence range (0.80-1.25) when the contents of a 70-mg LDX capsule were mixed with orange juice [Cmax: 0.971 (0.945, 0.998); AUC0-∞: 0.986 (0.955, 1.019); AUClast: 0.970 (0.937, 1.004)] or yogurt [Cmax: 0.970 (0.944, 0.997); AUC0-∞: 0.945 (0.915, 0.976); AUClast: 0.944 (0.912, 0.977)]. Geometric least squares mean ratios (90% CIs) for LDX (inactive prodrug) were below the accepted range when the contents of a 70-mg LDX capsule were mixed with orange juice [Cmax: 0.641 (0.582, 0.707); AUC0-∞: 0.716 (0.647, 0.792); AUClast: 0.708 (0.655, 0.766)]; the lower 90% CI for Cmax [0.828 (0.752, 0.912)] was below the accepted range when the contents of a 70-mg LDX capsule were mixed with yogurt.ConclusionsRelative bioavailability of D-amphetamine (the active moiety) did not differ across administrations, which suggests that emptying an LDX capsule into orange juice or yogurt and consuming it is an alternative to intact capsules.