Dataset Information

Comparison of missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis in 3 geographically proximate emergency departments.

ABSTRACT: Differences in the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV between different types of emergency departments (EDs) are not well understood. We seek to define missed opportunities for HIV diagnosis within 3 geographically proximate EDs serving different patient populations in a single metropolitan area.For an urban academic, an urban community, and a suburban community ED located within 10 miles of one another, we reviewed visit records for a cohort of patients who received a new diagnosis of HIV between July 1999 and June 2003. Missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis were defined as ED visits in the year before diagnosis, during which there was no documented ED HIV testing offer or test. Outcomes were the number of missed opportunity visits and the number of patients with a missed opportunity for each ED. We secondarily reviewed medical records for missed opportunity encounters, using an extensive list of indications that might conceivably trigger testing.Among 276 patients with a new HIV diagnosis, 123 (44.5%) visited an ED in the year before diagnosis or received a diagnosis in the ED. The urban academic ED HIV testing program diagnosed 23 (8.3%) cases and offered testing to 24 (8.7%) patients who declined. Missed opportunities occurred during 187 visits made by 76 (27.5%) patients. These included 70 patients with 157 visits at the urban academic ED, 9 patients with 24 visits at the urban community ED, and 4 patients with 6 visits at the suburban community ED. Medical records were available for 172 of the 187 missed opportunity visits. Visits were characterized by the following potential testing indicators: HIV risk factors (58; 34%), related diagnosis indicating risk (7; 4%), AIDS-defining illness (8; 5%), physician suspicion of HIV (29; 17%), and nonspecific signs or symptoms of illness potentially consistent with HIV (126; 73%).Geographically proximate EDs differ in their opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis, but all 3 sites had missed opportunities. Many ED patients with undiagnosed HIV have potential indications for testing documented even in the absence of a dedicated risk assessment, although most of these are nonspecific signs or symptoms of illness that may not be clinically useful selection criteria.

SUBMITTER: Lyons MS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3690121 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis in 3 geographically proximate emergency departments.

Lyons Michael S MS Lindsell Christopher J CJ Wayne D Beth DB Ruffner Andrew H AH Hart Kimberly W KW Fichtenbaum Carl J CJ Trott Alexander T AT Sullivan Patrick S PS

Annals of emergency medicine 20110701 1 Suppl 1

<h4>Objective</h4>Differences in the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV between different types of emergency departments (EDs) are not well understood. We seek to define missed opportunities for HIV diagnosis within 3 geographically proximate EDs serving different patient populations in a single metropolitan area.<h4>Methods</h4>For an urban academic, an urban community, and a suburban community ED located within 10 miles of one another, we reviewed visit records for a cohort of patients who received ...[more]

PMID: 21684399

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLate HIV diagnosis is associated with increased AIDS-related morbidity and mortality as well as an increased risk of HIV transmission. In this study, we quantified and characterized missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis in British Columbia (BC), Canada.DesignRetrospective cohort.MethodsA missed opportunity was defined as a healthcare encounter due to a clinical manifestation which may be caused by HIV infection, or is frequently present among those with HIV infection, but no HIV diagnosis followed within 30 days. We developed an algorithm to identify missed opportunities within one, three, and five years prior to diagnosis. The algorithm was applied to the BC STOP HIV/AIDS population-based cohort. Eligible individuals were ≥18 years old, and diagnosed from 2001-2014. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with missed opportunities.ResultsOf 2119 individuals, 7%, 12% and 14% had ≥1 missed opportunity during one, three and five years prior to HIV diagnosis, respectively. In all analyses, individuals aged ≥40 years, heterosexuals or people who ever injected drugs, and those residing in Northern health authority had increased odds of experiencing ≥1 missed opportunity. In the three and five-year analysis, individuals with a CD4 count <350 cells/mm3 were at higher odds of experiencing ≥1 missed opportunity. Prominent missed opportunities were related to recurrent pneumonia, herpes zoster/shingles among younger individuals, and anemia related to nutritional deficiencies or unspecified cause.ConclusionsBased on our newly-developed algorithm, this study demonstrated that HIV-diagnosed individuals in BC have experienced several missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis. Specific clinical indicator conditions and population sub-groups at increased risk of experiencing these missed opportunities were identified. Further work is required in order to validate the utility of this proposed algorithm by establishing the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values corresponding to the incidence of the clinical indicator conditions among both HIV-diagnosed and HIV-negative populations.

Project description:BackgroundTuberculosis meningitis (TBM) has high mortality and morbidity. Diagnostic delays can impact TBM outcomes. We aimed to estimate the number of potentially missed opportunities (MOs) to diagnose TBM and determine its impact on 90-day mortality.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort of adult patients with a central nervous system (CNS) TB International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revision (ICD-9/10) diagnosis code (013*, A17*) identified in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, State Inpatient and State Emergency Department (ED) Databases from 8 states. Missed opportunity was defined as composite of ICD-9/10 diagnosis/procedure codes that included CNS signs/symptoms, systemic illness, or non-CNS TB diagnosis during a hospital/ED visit 180 days before the index TBM admission. Demographics, comorbidities, admission characteristics, mortality, and admission costs were compared between those with and without a MO, and 90-day in-hospital mortality, using univariate and multivariable analyses.ResultsOf 893 patients with TBM, median age at diagnosis was 50 years (interquartile range, 37-64), 61.3% were male, and 35.2% had Medicaid as primary payer. Overall, 407 (45.6%) had a prior hospital or ED visit with an MO code. In-hospital 90-day mortality was not different between those with and without an MO, regardless of the MO coded during an ED visit (13.7% vs 15.2%, P = .73) or a hospitalization (28.2% vs 30.9%, P = .74). Independent risk of 90-day in-hospital mortality was associated with older age, hyponatremia (relative risk [RR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.4; P = .01), septicemia (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03-2.45; P = .03), and mechanical ventilation (RR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.25-5.3; P < .001) during the index admission.ConclusionsApproximately half the patients coded for TBM had a hospital or ED visit in the previous 6 months meeting the MO definition. We found no association between having an MO for TBM and 90-day in-hospital mortality.

Dataset Information

Comparison of missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis in 3 geographically proximate emergency departments.

Publications

Comparison of missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis in 3 geographically proximate emergency departments.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets