Dataset Information

Why do hip arthroscopy procedures fail?

ABSTRACT:

Background

Despite the successes of hip arthroscopy, clinical failures do occur, and identifying risk factors for failure may facilitate refinement of surgical indications and treatment. Knowledge regarding the reasons for treatment failures may also improve surgical decision making.

Questions/purposes

We (1) characterized patients whose symptoms recurred after hip arthroscopy necessitating a revision hip preservation procedure or hip arthroplasty, (2) determined the etiologies of failure, (3) and reported the profile of revision surgical procedures.

Methods

In a prospective database of 1724 consecutive hip surgeries, we identified 58 patients (60 hips) with a history of failed hip arthroscopy. Thirty-seven patients (38 hips) underwent revision hip preservation and 21 (22) hip arthroplasty. Thirty-nine (67%) were female. Demographics, etiology of failure, and type of revision surgery were analyzed.

Results

Patients treated with revision hip preservation were younger, had a lower BMI, and lower Tönnis osteoarthritis grade at the time of revision surgery compared to patients treated with hip arthroplasty. Common etiologies of failure were residual femoroacetabular impingement (68%) and acetabular dysplasia (24%) in patients treated with revision hip preservation and advanced osteoarthritis in patients treated with hip arthroplasty. The revision preservation procedures included arthroscopy in 16 (42%), arthroscopy with limited open capsulorraphy in two (5.3%), periacetabular osteotomy in nine (24%), and surgical dislocation in 12 (32%).

Conclusions

Residual or unaddressed structural deformity of the hip and underlying osteoarthritis are commonly associated with failure after hip arthroscopy. Thorough patient evaluation with detailed characterization of structural hip anatomy and articular cartilage integrity are critical to the selection of proper surgical intervention and successful patient outcome.

SUBMITTER: Bogunovic L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3705062 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Why do hip arthroscopy procedures fail?

Bogunovic Ljiljana L Gottlieb Meghan M Pashos Gail G Baca Geneva G Clohisy John C JC

Clinical orthopaedics and related research 20130801 8

<h4>Background</h4>Despite the successes of hip arthroscopy, clinical failures do occur, and identifying risk factors for failure may facilitate refinement of surgical indications and treatment. Knowledge regarding the reasons for treatment failures may also improve surgical decision making.<h4>Questions/purposes</h4>We (1) characterized patients whose symptoms recurred after hip arthroscopy necessitating a revision hip preservation procedure or hip arthroplasty, (2) determined the etiologies of ...[more]

PMID: 23637056

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate whether the presence of residents in hip arthroscopy (HA) procedures affects short-term surgical outcomes.MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database was used to identify patients who underwent HA from 2006 to 2012. Demographic and 30-day outcome variables were compared between cohorts of patients with and without residents. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify whether resident involvement was an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes. Propensity score matching was performed to control for all demographic and intraoperative variables.ResultsA total of 869 patients (59.7% female) were included in this study, 626 of which reported data on resident involvement. Patients were mostly White (73.4% of cases without a resident, 51.8% with a resident, P < .05). Those with residents were younger (P = .016), had lower modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) scores (P = .028), and had fewer cardiac comorbidities (P = .008). There was no difference in diabetic status, dyspnea symptoms, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal comorbidity, neurologic comorbidity, cumulative comorbidities, history of bleeding disorders, inpatient vs. outpatient treatment, preoperative functional status, smoking history, and steroid use for chronic conditions. There was no difference in all complications, operative time, length of stay, reoperation, readmission, wound complication, venous thromboembolism, blood transfusions, or sepsis. Propensity score match for demographic and intraoperative differences found no association between resident involvement and increased complications. Resident involvement was not an independent risk factor for all complications studied.ConclusionResident involvement in HA procedures was not a risk factor for 30-day complications between 2006 and 2012. Resident involvement did not increase the risk of adverse outcomes, readmission, reoperation, or length of stay, nor did it significantly increase operative times.

Dataset Information

Why do hip arthroscopy procedures fail?

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Why do hip arthroscopy procedures fail?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets