Dataset Information

Agonist treatment did not affect association of mu opioid receptors with lipid rafts and cholesterol reduction had opposite effects on the receptor-mediated signaling in rat brain and CHO cells.

ABSTRACT: Lipid rafts are small cholesterol- and glycosphingolipid-enriched membrane subdomains. Here we compared the mu opioid receptor (MOR)-lipid rafts relationship in the rat brain, where neurons have non-caveolae rafts, and in CHO cells stably transfected with HA-rat MOR (CHO-HA-rMOR), which are enriched in caveolae. Membranes of rat caudate putamen (CPu) and thalamus or CHO-HA-rMOR cells were homogenized, sonicated in a detergent-free 0.5 M Na(2)CO(3) buffer and fractionated through sucrose density gradients. Western blot and [(3)H]diprenorphine binding showed that approximately 70% of MOR in CHO-HA-rMOR was present in low-density (5-20% sucrose) fractions enriched in cholesterol and/or ganglioside M1 (GM1) (lipid rafts) in plasma membranes, whereas about 70% and 45% of MOR in CPu and thalamus, respectively, were associated with lipid rafts. Incubation with a saturating concentration of etorphine or morphine at 37 degrees C for 30 min failed to change the MOR location in rafts in CHO-HA-rMOR, indicating that the internalized MOR does not move out of rafts, in contrast to the delta opioid receptor. In vivo, rafts association of MOR in CPu and thalamus was not affected significantly in rats implanted with two 75-mg morphine pellets for 72 h. In addition, cholesterol reduction by methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (MCD) disrupted rafts and shifted MOR to higher density fractions in both CHO-HA-rMOR and CPu membranes. However, MCD treatment had opposite impacts on MOR signaling in the two tissues: it attenuated MOR-mediated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in CPu but enhanced it in CHO-HA-rMOR.

SUBMITTER: Huang P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3715317 | biostudies-literature | 2007 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Agonist treatment did not affect association of mu opioid receptors with lipid rafts and cholesterol reduction had opposite effects on the receptor-mediated signaling in rat brain and CHO cells.

Huang Peng P Xu Wei W Yoon Su-In SI Chen Chongguang C Chong Parkson Lee-Gau PL Unterwald Ellen M EM Liu-Chen Lee-Yuan LY

Brain research 20071012

Lipid rafts are small cholesterol- and glycosphingolipid-enriched membrane subdomains. Here we compared the mu opioid receptor (MOR)-lipid rafts relationship in the rat brain, where neurons have non-caveolae rafts, and in CHO cells stably transfected with HA-rat MOR (CHO-HA-rMOR), which are enriched in caveolae. Membranes of rat caudate putamen (CPu) and thalamus or CHO-HA-rMOR cells were homogenized, sonicated in a detergent-free 0.5 M Na(2)CO(3) buffer and fractionated through sucrose density ...[more]

PMID: 17980352

Similar Datasets

Project description:Although participation of opioids in antinociception induced by cannabinoids has been documented, there is little information regarding the participation of cannabinoids in the antinociceptive mechanisms of opioids. The aim of the present study was to determine whether endocannabinoids could be involved in peripheral antinociception induced by activation of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors.Nociceptive thresholds to mechanical stimulation of rat paws treated with intraplantar prostaglandin E2 (PGE2, 2 microg) to induce hyperalgesia were measured 3 h after injection using an algesimetric apparatus. Opioid agonists morphine (200 microg), (+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-Allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide (SNC80) (80 microg), bremazocine (50 microg); cannabinoid receptor antagonists N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM251) (20-80 microg), 6-iodo-2-methyl-1-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]-1H-indol-3-yl(4-methoxyphenyl) methanone (AM630) (12.5-100 microg); and an inhibitor of methyl arachidonyl fluorophosphonate (MAFP) (1-4 microg) were also injected in the paw.The CB1-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM251 completely reversed the peripheral antinociception induced by morphine in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the CB2-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM630 elicited partial antagonism of this effect. In addition, the administration of the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor, MAFP, enhanced the antinociception induced by morphine. The cannabinoid receptor antagonists AM251 and AM630 did not modify the antinociceptive effect of SNC80 or bremazocine. The antagonists alone did not cause any hyperalgesic or antinociceptive effect.Our results provide evidence for the involvement of endocannabinoids, in the peripheral antinociception induced by the mu-opioid receptor agonist morphine. The release of cannabinoids appears not to be involved in the peripheral antinociceptive effect induced by kappa- and delta-opioid receptor agonists.

Project description:Mu-opioid receptor agonists are clinically effective analgesics, but also produce undesirable effects that limit their clinical utility. The nociceptin opioid peptide (NOP) receptor system also modulates nociception, and NOP agonists might be useful adjuncts to enhance the analgesic effects or attenuate the undesirable effects of mu-opioid agonists. The present study determined behavioral interactions between the NOP agonist (-)-Ro 64-6198 and mu-opioid ligands that vary in mu-opioid receptor efficacy (17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14β-dihyroxy-4,5α-epoxy-6α-[(3 ́-isoquinolyl)acetamindo]morphinan (NAQ) < buprenorphine < nalbuphine < morphine = oxycodone < methadone) in male rhesus monkeys. For comparison, Ro 64-6198 interactions were also examined with the kappa-opioid receptor agonist nalfurafine. Each opioid ligand was examined alone and following fixed-dose Ro 64-6198 pretreatments in assays of thermal nociception (n = 3-4) and schedule-controlled responding (n = 3). Ro 64-6198 alone failed to produce significant antinociception up to doses (0.32 mg/kg, IM) that significantly decreased rates of responding. All opioid ligands, except NAQ and nalfurafine, produced dose- and thermal intensity-dependent antinociception. Ro 64-6198 enhanced the antinociceptive potency of buprenorphine, nalbuphine, methadone, and nalfurafine. Ro 64-6198 enhancement of nalbuphine antinociception was NOP antagonist SB-612111 reversible and occurred under a narrow range of dose and time conditions. All opioid ligands, except NAQ and buprenorphine, produced dose-dependent decreases in rates of responding. Ro 64-6198 did not significantly alter mu-opioid ligand rate-decreasing effects. Although these results suggest that NOP agonists may selectively enhance the antinociceptive vs. rate-suppressant effects of some mu-opioid agonists, this small enhancement occurred under a narrow range of conditions dampening enthusiasm for NOP agonists as candidate "opioid-sparing" adjuncts.

Dataset Information

Agonist treatment did not affect association of mu opioid receptors with lipid rafts and cholesterol reduction had opposite effects on the receptor-mediated signaling in rat brain and CHO cells.

Publications

Agonist treatment did not affect association of mu opioid receptors with lipid rafts and cholesterol reduction had opposite effects on the receptor-mediated signaling in rat brain and CHO cells.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets