Dataset Information

How do patients with end-stage ankle arthritis decide between two surgical treatments? A qualitative study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To examine how patients decide between ankle fusion and ankle replacement in end-stage ankle arthritis.

Design

Purposive patient selection, semistructured interviews, thematic analysis.

Setting

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.

Participants

14 patients diagnosed with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis.

Results

We interviewed 6 men and 8 women with a mean age of 58 years (range 41-83). All had opted for surgery after failure of at least 6 months of conservative management, sequentially trading-off daily activities to limit the evolving pain. To decide between two offered treatments of ankle fusion and total ankle replacement (TAR), three major sources informed the patients' decision-making process: their surgeon, peers and the internet. The treating surgeon was viewed as the most reliable and influential source of information. Information gleaned from other patients was also important, but with questionable reliability, as was information from the internet, both of which invariably required validation by the surgeon and in some cases the general practitioner.

Conclusions

Patients seek knowledge from a wealth of sources including the internet, web forums and other patients. While they leverage each of these sources to guide decision-making, the most important and influential factor in governing how patients decide on any particular surgical intervention is their surgeon. A high quality doctor-patient relationship, coupled with clear, balanced and complete information is essential to enable shared decision-making to become a standard model of care.

SUBMITTER: Zaidi R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3717458 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

How do patients with end-stage ankle arthritis decide between two surgical treatments? A qualitative study.

Zaidi Razi R Pfeil Michael M Macgregor Alexander J AJ Goldberg Andy A

BMJ open 20130716 7

<h4>Objective</h4>To examine how patients decide between ankle fusion and ankle replacement in end-stage ankle arthritis.<h4>Design</h4>Purposive patient selection, semistructured interviews, thematic analysis.<h4>Setting</h4>Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.<h4>Participants</h4>14 patients diagnosed with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis.<h4>Results</h4>We interviewed 6 men and 8 women with a mean age of 58 years (range 41-83). All had opted for surgery after failure of at least 6 ...[more]

PMID: 23864209

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAnkle replacement and ankle arthrodesis are standard treatments for treating end-stage ankle arthritis when conservative treatment fails. Comparing patient-reported outcome scores to the instrument's minimal important difference (MID) helps physicians and researchers infer whether a meaningful change in health from the patient's perspective has occurred following treatment. The objective of this study was to estimate the MID of the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale among a cohort of operatively treated end-stage ankle arthritis patients undergoing ankle replacement or arthrodesis.MethodsA survey package including the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale was completed by participants preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Distribution and anchor-based approaches to calculating the MID were used to estimate the MID of the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale and its 2 domains. The distribution-based approaches used were the small and medium effect size methods, while the mean absolute change method and linear regression method were the anchor-based approaches. Bootstrap sampling was used to obtain the variance of MID estimates. The MID was estimated for sex, age, operative, and baseline health subgroups. The cohort comprised 283 participants, totaling 298 ankles.ResultsThe MID did not vary with sex or operative procedure. Age-based differences in MID values may exist for the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale total score, and MID values were generally smallest among the oldest patients. Patients with the best and worst ankle-related health preoperatively had higher MID values than patients reporting mid-range Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale values preoperatively.ConclusionThe best estimate of the MID of the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale total score is 5.81. Our findings indicate that the MID of the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale may not vary by sex or operative subgroups but likely varies by age and preoperative Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale score.Level of evidenceLevel II, prospective comparative study.

Project description:BACKGROUND:This study summarized the frequency and functional impact of adverse events (AEs) that occur after surgery for end-stage ankle arthritis (ESAA) to inform decision making. METHODS:This was a multisite prospective cohort study to compare ankle arthroplasty to ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of ESAA among 6 participating sites. We compared the risk and impact of nonankle AEs and ankle-specific AEs versus no AEs controlling for potential confounding factors, including operative procedure using multinomial logistic regression. We estimated differences in postoperative functional outcomes by AE occurrence using linear mixed effects regression. Among 517 patients who had surgery for ankle arthritis and completed the full baseline assessment, follow-up scores were available in 494 (95%) patients. RESULTS:There were a total of 628 reported AEs (477 in the arthroplasty group and 151 in the arthrodesis group). These occurred in 261 (63%) arthroplasty patients and 67 (65%) arthrodesis patients. There were 50 (8%) ankle-specific AEs. The risk of an ankle-specific AE was slightly higher in the arthrodesis group versus the arthroplasty group, odds ratio (OR) 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI, 0.85, 3.98). The OR for the risk of non-ankle-specific AE versus no AE was 0.96, 95% CI (0.57, 1.61) for those receiving arthrodesis compared to arthroplasty. Compared to patients with no AEs, those experiencing ankle-specific AEs had significantly less improvement in Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sports and activities of daily living (ADL) subscores and worst pain outcomes; however, both groups improved significantly in all measures except mental health. CONCLUSIONS:Ankle-specific AEs were infrequent and only weakly associated with operative procedure. Although patients improved in all functional outcomes except mental health, regardless of AE occurrence, ankle-specific AEs negatively impacted patient improvement compared to those with no AEs or a nonankle AE. The logistical effort and cost of tracking nonankle AEs does not seem to be justified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level II, prospective comparative study.

Project description:BackgroundEvidence is lacking to inform providers' and patients' decisions about many common treatment strategies for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD).Methods/designThe DEcIDE Patient Outcomes in ESRD Study is funded by the United States (US) Agency for Health Care Research and Quality to study the comparative effectiveness of: 1) antihypertensive therapies, 2) early versus later initiation of dialysis, and 3) intravenous iron therapies on clinical outcomes in patients with ESRD. Ongoing studies utilize four existing, nationally representative cohorts of patients with ESRD, including (1) the Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for ESRD study (1041 incident dialysis patients recruited from October 1995 to June 1999 with complete outcome ascertainment through 2009), (2) the Dialysis Clinic Inc (45,124 incident dialysis patients initiating and receiving their care from 2003-2010 with complete outcome ascertainment through 2010), (3) the United States Renal Data System (333,308 incident dialysis patients from 2006-2009 with complete outcome ascertainment through 2010), and (4) the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Chronic Kidney Disease Registry (53,399 patients with chronic kidney disease with outcome ascertainment from 2005 through 2009). We ascertain patient reported outcomes (i.e., health-related quality of life), morbidity, and mortality using clinical and administrative data, and data obtained from national death indices. We use advanced statistical methods (e.g., propensity scoring and marginal structural modeling) to account for potential biases of our study designs. All data are de-identified for analyses. The conduct of studies and dissemination of findings are guided by input from Stakeholders in the ESRD community.DiscussionThe DEcIDE Patient Outcomes in ESRD Study will provide needed evidence regarding the effectiveness of common treatments employed for dialysis patients. Carefully planned dissemination strategies to the ESRD community will enhance studies' impact on clinical care and patients' outcomes.

Project description:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:We investigated the incidence of ESKD after surgical management of kidney cancer in the Australian state of Queensland, and described patterns in the initiation of kidney replacement therapy resulting from kidney cancer across Australia. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS:All newly diagnosed cases of kidney cancer in the Australian state of Queensland between January of 2009 and December of 2014 were ascertained through the Queensland Cancer Registry. There were 2739 patients included in our analysis. Patients who developed ESKD were identified using international classification of disease-10-coded hospital administrative data. Incidence rate and 3-year cumulative incidence were calculated, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with ESKD. Additional descriptive analysis was undertaken of Australian population data. RESULTS:The incidence rate of ESKD in all patients was 4.9 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.9 to 6.2) per 1000 patient-years. The 3-year cumulative incidence was 1.7%, 1.9%, and 1.0% for all patients, and patients managed with radical or partial nephrectomy, respectively. Apart from preoperative kidney disease, exposures associated with increased ESKD risk were age?65 years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.2), male sex (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.3), preoperative diabetes (aHR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.3), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ?3 (aHR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.2 to 7.4), socioeconomic disadvantage (aHR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.9 to 2.7), and postoperative length of hospitalization ?6 days (aHR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.0). Australia-wide trends indicate that the rate of kidney replacement therapy after oncologic nephrectomy doubled between 1995 and 2015, from 0.3 to 0.6 per 100,000 per year. CONCLUSIONS:In Queensland between 2009 and 2014, one in 53 patients managed with radical nephrectomy and one in 100 patients managed with partial nephrectomy developed ESKD within 3 years of surgery. PODCAST:This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2018_09_28_CJASNPodcast_18_1_.mp3.

Project description:IntroductionEnd-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with an increased propensity for critical illness, but whether ESRD is independently associated with a greater risk of death after major surgical procedures is unclear.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from all adult (>18 years) patients admitted to a 50-bed surgical intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2004 and January 2009. ESRD was defined as the need for chronic peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis for at least 6 weeks prior to ICU admission. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis and propensity-score matching to adjust for possible confounders.ResultsIn total, 12,938 adult patients were admitted during the study period; 199 patients had ESRD at ICU admission, giving a prevalence of 1.5%. Patients with ESRD were more likely to be male (72.9% versus 63.0%, P?=?0.004) and had higher severity scores, a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus and cirrhosis, and a lower incidence of cancer at ICU admission than those without ESRD. Patients with ESRD were more likely to have any type of organ failure at ICU admission and during the ICU stay. Patients with ESRD had higher ICU and hospital mortality rates (23.1% and 31.2% versus 5.5% and 10.0%, respectively, P <0.001 pairwise) and longer ICU length of stay (2 (1 to 7) versus 1 (1 to 3) days, P <0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, ESRD was independently associated with a greater risk of in-hospital death (odds ratio?=?3.84, 95% confidence interval 2.68 to 5.5, P <0.001). In 199 pairs of patients, hematologic and hepatic failures were more prevalent, ICU and hospital mortality rates were higher (23.1% versus 15.1% and 31.2% versus 19.1%, P <0.05 pairwise), and ICU length of stay was longer (2 (1 to 7) versus 1 (1 to 7) days, P <0.001) in patients with ESRD.ConclusionsIn this large cohort of surgical ICU patients, presence of ESRD at ICU admission was associated with greater morbidity and mortality and independently associated with a greater risk of in-hospital death. Our data can be useful in preoperative risk stratification.

Dataset Information

How do patients with end-stage ankle arthritis decide between two surgical treatments? A qualitative study.

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Results

Conclusions

Publications

How do patients with end-stage ankle arthritis decide between two surgical treatments? A qualitative study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure