Dataset Information

The application of regional hypothermia using transrectal cooling during radical prostatectomy: mitigation of surgical inflammatory damage to preserve continence.

ABSTRACT: Preservation of continence and sexual function continues to be a formidable quality-of-life issue regarding outcomes after radical prostatectomy. There is little argument that physical preservation of the nerves and sphincters is a critical component to achieving success in these domains. Previously demonstrated factors such as advancing age, deteriorating physical health status, and subnormal baseline potency negatively impact outcomes. Our hypothesis, however, has been that inflammatory response to surgery has a large impact on surgical outcomes of prostatectomy. Trauma-induced inflammation could account for variation in recovery despite nearly identical surgery on many patients, especially in high-volume surgeons. In other words, we suggest and maintain that younger and healthier patients tolerate and/or recover better from the trauma/inflammation of surgery. Those who do not recover as well may have altered inflammatory response to injury. A common response to decrease inflammation in response to physical injury would be as simple as to cool the injury with ice. Previous neurologic studies have suggested that using ice during surgical intervention can reduce the inflammatory damage. Therefore, we applied this concept that preemptive hypothermia could reduce inflammation to the robot-assisted prostatectomy procedure to potentially lead to improved continence and potency outcomes. In 2009, we introduced the concept of regional hypothermia via an endorectal cooling balloon during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We have published our single institution data demonstrating a significant reduction of overall incontinence. Defining continence as zero-pads, our overall 1-year incontinence has been reduced by 70% (from 13% to 4%). Severe incontinence, defined as two or more pads, was likewise reduced by 70% (from 2.9% to 0.9%). Regional hypothermia used during the time of surgery represents a novel strategy for minimizing inflammation and subsequent muscle and nerve damage in RARP.

SUBMITTER: Liss MA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3727519 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The application of regional hypothermia using transrectal cooling during radical prostatectomy: mitigation of surgical inflammatory damage to preserve continence.

Liss Michael A MA Skarecky Douglas D Morales Blanca B Ahlering Thomas E TE

Journal of endourology 20121115 12

Preservation of continence and sexual function continues to be a formidable quality-of-life issue regarding outcomes after radical prostatectomy. There is little argument that physical preservation of the nerves and sphincters is a critical component to achieving success in these domains. Previously demonstrated factors such as advancing age, deteriorating physical health status, and subnormal baseline potency negatively impact outcomes. Our hypothesis, however, has been that inflammatory respon ...[more]

PMID: 23153199

Similar Datasets

Project description:CONTEXT:Membranous urethral length (MUL) measured prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) has been identified as a factor that is associated with the recovery of continence following surgery. OBJECTIVE:To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting the effect of MUL on the recovery of continence following RP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION:A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases up to September 2015 was performed. Thirteen studies comprising one randomized controlled trial and 12 cohort studies were selected for inclusion. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS:Four studies (1738 patients) that reported hazard ratio results. Every extra millimeter (mm) of MUL was associated with a faster return to continence (hazard ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.08, p<0.001). Eleven studies (6993 patients) reported the OR (OR) for the return to continence at one or more postoperative time points. MUL had a significant positive effect on continence recovery at 3 mo (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14, p=0.004), 6 mo (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.0001). and 12 mo (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.22, p=0.006) following surgery. After adjusting for repeated measurements over time and studies with overlapping data, all OR data combined indicated that every extra millimeter of MUL was associated with significantly greater odds for return to continence (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.15, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:A greater preoperative MUL is significantly and positively associated with a return to continence in men following RP. Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of MUL is recommended prior to RP. PATIENT SUMMARY:We examined the effect that the length of a section of the urethra (called the membranous urethra) had on the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy surgery. Our results indicate that measuring the length of the membranous urethra via magnetic resonance imaging before surgery may be useful to predict a longer period of urinary incontinence after surgery, or to explain a delay in achieving continence after surgery.

Project description:Prostate cancer is the second most common type of cancer in Canadian men. Radical prostatectomy is one of the treatment options available, and involves removing the prostate gland and surrounding tissues. In recent years, surgeons have begun to use robot-assisted radical prostatectomy more frequently. We aimed to determine the clinical benefits and harms of the robotic surgical system for radical prostatectomy (robot-assisted radical prostatectomy) compared with the open and laparoscopic surgical methods. We also assessed the cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer in Ontario.We performed a literature search and included prospective comparative studies that examined robot-assisted versus open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. The outcomes of interest were perioperative, functional, and oncological. The quality of the body of evidence was examined according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We also conducted a cost-utility analysis with a 1-year time horizon. The potential long-term benefits of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for functional and oncological outcomes were also evaluated in a 10-year Markov model in scenario analyses. In addition, we conducted a budget impact analysis to estimate the additional costs to the provincial budget if the adoption of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were to increase in the next 5 years. A needs assessment determined that the published literature on patient perspectives was relatively well developed, and that direct patient engagement would add relatively little new information.Compared with the open approach, we found robot-assisted radical prostatectomy reduced length of stay and blood loss (moderate quality evidence) but had no difference or inconclusive results for functional and oncological outcomes (low to moderate quality evidence). Compared with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy had no difference in perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes (low to moderate quality evidence). Compared with open radical prostatectomy, our best estimates suggested that robot-assisted prostatectomy was associated with higher costs ($6,234) and a small gain in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (0.0012). The best estimate of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $5.2 million per QALY gained. However, if robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were assumed to have substantially better long-term functional and oncological outcomes, the ICER might be as low as $83,921 per QALY gained. We estimated the annual budget impact to be $0.8 million to $3.4 million over the next 5 years.There is no high-quality evidence that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy improves functional and oncological outcomes compared with open and laparoscopic approaches. However, compared with open radical prostatectomy, the costs of using the robotic system are relatively large while the health benefits are relatively small.

Dataset Information

The application of regional hypothermia using transrectal cooling during radical prostatectomy: mitigation of surgical inflammatory damage to preserve continence.

Publications

The application of regional hypothermia using transrectal cooling during radical prostatectomy: mitigation of surgical inflammatory damage to preserve continence.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure