Dataset Information

Comparison of imputation methods for missing laboratory data in medicine.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Missing laboratory data is a common issue, but the optimal method of imputation of missing values has not been determined. The aims of our study were to compare the accuracy of four imputation methods for missing completely at random laboratory data and to compare the effect of the imputed values on the accuracy of two clinical predictive models.

Design

Retrospective cohort analysis of two large data sets.

Setting

A tertiary level care institution in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Participants

The Cirrhosis cohort had 446 patients and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease cohort had 395 patients.

Methods

Non-missing laboratory data were randomly removed with varying frequencies from two large data sets, and we then compared the ability of four methods-missForest, mean imputation, nearest neighbour imputation and multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE)-to impute the simulated missing data. We characterised the accuracy of the imputation and the effect of the imputation on predictive ability in two large data sets.

Results

MissForest had the least imputation error for both continuous and categorical variables at each frequency of missingness, and it had the smallest prediction difference when models used imputed laboratory values. In both data sets, MICE had the second least imputation error and prediction difference, followed by the nearest neighbour and mean imputation.

Conclusions

MissForest is a highly accurate method of imputation for missing laboratory data and outperforms other common imputation techniques in terms of imputation error and maintenance of predictive ability with imputed values in two clinical predicative models.

SUBMITTER: Waljee AK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3733317 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of imputation methods for missing laboratory data in medicine.

Waljee Akbar K AK Mukherjee Ashin A Singal Amit G AG Zhang Yiwei Y Warren Jeffrey J Balis Ulysses U Marrero Jorge J Zhu Ji J Higgins Peter Dr PD

BMJ open 20130801 8

<h4>Objectives</h4>Missing laboratory data is a common issue, but the optimal method of imputation of missing values has not been determined. The aims of our study were to compare the accuracy of four imputation methods for missing completely at random laboratory data and to compare the effect of the imputed values on the accuracy of two clinical predictive models.<h4>Design</h4>Retrospective cohort analysis of two large data sets.<h4>Setting</h4>A tertiary level care institution in Ann Arbor, M ...[more]

PMID: 23906948

Similar Datasets

Project description:The real-world data analysis and processing using data mining techniques often are facing observations that contain missing values. The main challenge of mining datasets is the existence of missing values. The missing values in a dataset should be imputed using the imputation method to improve the data mining methods' accuracy and performance. There are existing techniques that use k-nearest neighbors algorithm for imputing the missing values but determining the appropriate k value can be a challenging task. There are other existing imputation techniques that are based on hard clustering algorithms. When records are not well-separated, as in the case of missing data, hard clustering provides a poor description tool in many cases. In general, the imputation depending on similar records is more accurate than the imputation depending on the entire dataset's records. Improving the similarity among records can result in improving the imputation performance. This paper proposes two numerical missing data imputation methods. A hybrid missing data imputation method is initially proposed, called KI, that incorporates k-nearest neighbors and iterative imputation algorithms. The best set of nearest neighbors for each missing record is discovered through the records similarity by using the k-nearest neighbors algorithm (kNN). To improve the similarity, a suitable k value is estimated automatically for the kNN. The iterative imputation method is then used to impute the missing values of the incomplete records by using the global correlation structure among the selected records. An enhanced hybrid missing data imputation method is then proposed, called FCKI, which is an extension of KI. It integrates fuzzy c-means, k-nearest neighbors, and iterative imputation algorithms to impute the missing data in a dataset. The fuzzy c-means algorithm is selected because the records can belong to multiple clusters at the same time. This can lead to further improvement for similarity. FCKI searches a cluster, instead of the whole dataset, to find the best k-nearest neighbors. It applies two levels of similarity to achieve a higher imputation accuracy. The performance of the proposed imputation techniques is assessed by using fifteen datasets with variant missing ratios for three types of missing data; MCAR, MAR, MNAR. These different missing data types are generated in this work. The datasets with different sizes are used in this paper to validate the model. Therefore, proposed imputation techniques are compared with other missing data imputation methods by means of three measures; the root mean square error (RMSE), the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and the mean absolute error (MAE). The results show that the proposed methods achieve better imputation accuracy and require significantly less time than other missing data imputation methods.

Project description:BackgroundMissing participant outcome data (MOD) are ubiquitous in systematic reviews with network meta-analysis (NMA) as they invade from the inclusion of clinical trials with reported participant losses. There are available strategies to address aggregate MOD, and in particular binary MOD, while considering the missing at random (MAR) assumption as a starting point. Little is known about their performance though regarding the meta-analytic parameters of a random-effects model for aggregate binary outcome data as obtained from trial-reports (i.e. the number of events and number of MOD out of the total randomised per arm).MethodsWe used four strategies to handle binary MOD under MAR and we classified these strategies to those modelling versus excluding/imputing MOD and to those accounting for versus ignoring uncertainty about MAR. We investigated the performance of these strategies in terms of core NMA estimates by performing both an empirical and simulation study using random-effects NMA based on electrical network theory. We used Bland-Altman plots to illustrate the agreement between the compared strategies, and we considered the mean bias, coverage probability and width of the confidence interval to be the frequentist measures of performance.ResultsModelling MOD under MAR agreed with exclusion and imputation under MAR in terms of estimated log odds ratios and inconsistency factor, whereas accountability or not of the uncertainty regarding MOD affected intervention hierarchy and precision around the NMA estimates: strategies that ignore uncertainty about MOD led to more precise NMA estimates, and increased between-trial variance. All strategies showed good performance for low MOD (<5%), consistent evidence and low between-trial variance, whereas performance was compromised for large informative MOD (>?20%), inconsistent evidence and substantial between-trial variance, especially for strategies that ignore uncertainty due to MOD.ConclusionsThe analysts should avoid applying strategies that manipulate MOD before analysis (i.e. exclusion and imputation) as they implicate the inferences negatively. Modelling MOD, on the other hand, via a pattern-mixture model to propagate the uncertainty about MAR assumption constitutes both conceptually and statistically proper strategy to address MOD in a systematic review.

Project description:BackgroundIncomplete categorical variables with more than two categories are common in public health data. However, most of the existing missing-data methods do not use the information from nonresponse (missingness) probabilities.MethodsWe propose a nearest-neighbour multiple imputation approach to impute a missing at random categorical outcome and to estimate the proportion of each category. The donor set for imputation is formed by measuring distances between each missing value with other non-missing values. The distance function is calculated based on a predictive score, which is derived from two working models: one fits a multinomial logistic regression for predicting the missing categorical outcome (the outcome model) and the other fits a logistic regression for predicting missingness probabilities (the missingness model). A weighting scheme is used to accommodate contributions from two working models when generating the predictive score. A missing value is imputed by randomly selecting one of the non-missing values with the smallest distances. We conduct a simulation to evaluate the performance of the proposed method and compare it with several alternative methods. A real-data application is also presented.ResultsThe simulation study suggests that the proposed method performs well when missingness probabilities are not extreme under some misspecifications of the working models. However, the calibration estimator, which is also based on two working models, can be highly unstable when missingness probabilities for some observations are extremely high. In this scenario, the proposed method produces more stable and better estimates. In addition, proper weights need to be chosen to balance the contributions from the two working models and achieve optimal results for the proposed method.ConclusionsWe conclude that the proposed multiple imputation method is a reasonable approach to dealing with missing categorical outcome data with more than two levels for assessing the distribution of the outcome. In terms of the choices for the working models, we suggest a multinomial logistic regression for predicting the missing outcome and a binary logistic regression for predicting the missingness probability.

Dataset Information

Comparison of imputation methods for missing laboratory data in medicine.

Objectives

Design

Setting

Participants

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Comparison of imputation methods for missing laboratory data in medicine.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure