Dataset Information

Statin use and asthma control in patients with severe asthma.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

We hypothesised that severe asthmatics taking a statin drug, in addition to inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting ?-agonist inhaler therapy, would have better asthma symptom control and improved lung function compared to their controls.

Study design

A retrospective, cross-sectional study of 165 patients with severe asthma seen from 2001-2008. Hierarchical linear and logistic regression models were used for modelling fitting.

Setting

University of California, Davis Medical Center (Sacramento, California, USA). Academic, single-centre, severe asthma subspecialty clinic.

Participants

612 screened, 223 eligible and 165 adult patients were included in the final study (N=165; 31 statin users and 134 non-users).

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary endpoint was asthma control as measured by the Asthma Control Test (ACT). The secondary endpoints included lung function, symptoms and the need for corticosteroid burst and peripheral eosinophil count.

Results

At baseline, statin users compared to non-users were older, had lower lung function (FEV1% predicted, FEV1, forced vital capacity and FEF25-75%) and had a higher prevalence of comorbid conditions. Statin use was associated with more aspirin and ipratropium inhaler use than in non-users. Patients in both groups were obese (body mass index ? 30). Statin users had better asthma symptom control compared to non-users (higher adjusted mean ACT score by 2.2±0.94 points, p<0.02). Median statin use was for 1 year. There were no statistically significant differences in lung function, corticosteroid or rescue bronchodilator use or peripheral eosinophilia between the two groups.

Conclusions

In our severe asthma referral population, statin users already taking inhaled controller therapy achieved better asthma control compared to non-users. The implications of this study is that patients with severe asthma could potentially benefit from added statin treatment. Because our study population was on average obese, the obese severe asthmatic may be a viable asthma subphenotype for further studies. Prospective randomised clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of statins in severe asthma are warranted.

SUBMITTER: Zeki AA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3752054 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Statin use and asthma control in patients with severe asthma.

Zeki Amir A AA Oldham Justin J Wilson Machelle M Fortenko Olga O Goyal Vishal V Last Michael M Last Andrew A Patel Ayan A Last Jerold A JA Kenyon Nicholas J NJ

BMJ open 20130813 8

<h4>Objectives</h4>We hypothesised that severe asthmatics taking a statin drug, in addition to inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonist inhaler therapy, would have better asthma symptom control and improved lung function compared to their controls.<h4>Study design</h4>A retrospective, cross-sectional study of 165 patients with severe asthma seen from 2001-2008. Hierarchical linear and logistic regression models were used for modelling fitting.<h4>Setting</h4>University of California, Davis ...[more]

PMID: 23943778

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:We designed an Internet-Based Monitoring Systems (IBS) survey to facilitate monitoring of asthma symptoms and asthma exacerbations in the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP). Our objective was to evaluate compliance with the IBS survey tool and to explore how data from an IBS tool can inform understanding of asthma phenotypes. METHODS:We invited adult subjects in the SARP III cohort (N = 528) to complete a monthly IBS asthma control survey. We compared the characteristics of subjects who did and those who did not participate in the IBS survey tool. Among subjects who participated in the IBS (IBS+), we identified participants with low, medium, and high Asthma Control Test (ACT) score variability, and we explored asthma morbidity in these three participant subgroups. RESULTS:Two hundred fifty-nine subjects participated in the IBS (IBS+) survey. Compared with subjects who did not engage with the IBS (IBS-) survey, IBS+ subjects were older and more likely to be white, college educated, and have an annual household income > $25,000, and have controlled asthma. Among IBS+ participants, the subgroup with the highest ACT score variability was more likely to have severe asthma, with a lower ACT score at baseline and increased asthma-related health-care use (often precipitated by cold and flulike illnesses). Participants with high ACT variability were also characterized by metabolic dysfunction, as evidenced by obesity and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS:Active participation with an Internet-based symptom survey tool in patients with severe asthma is influenced by race, socioeconomic status, and asthma control. Among survey participants, a group with highly variable (labile) asthma control is identifiable as a specific subgroup with unmet treatment needs. The association of asthma lability, increased susceptibility to adverse asthma effects of cold and flulike illnesses, and metabolic dysfunction provides clues for potentially effective intervention strategies.

Project description:BackgroundThe UK Severe Asthma Registry (UKSAR) is the world's largest national severe asthma registry collecting standardised data on referrals to UK specialist services. Novel biologic therapies have transformed the management of type 2(T2)-high severe asthma but have highlighted unmet need in patients with persisting symptoms despite suppression of T2-cytokine pathways with corticosteroids.MethodsDemographic, clinical and treatments characteristics for patients meeting European Respiratory Society / American Thoracic Society severe asthma criteria were examined for 2225 patients attending 15 specialist severe asthma centres. We assessed differences in biomarker low patients (fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) <25?ppb, blood eosinophils <150/?L) compared with a biomarker high population (FeNO ?25?ppb, blood eosinophils ?150/µL).ResultsAge (mean 49.6 (14.3) y), age of asthma onset (24.2 (19.1) y) and female predominance (62.4%) were consistent with prior severe asthma cohorts. Poor symptom control (Asthma Control Questionnaire-6: 2.9 (1.4)) with high exacerbation rate (4 (IQR: 2, 7)) were common despite high-dose treatment (51.7% on maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCS)). 68.9% were prescribed biologic therapies including mepolizumab (50.3%), benralizumab (26.1%) and omalizumab (22.6%). T2-low patients had higher body mass index (32.1 vs 30.2, p<0.001), depression/anxiety prevalence (12.3% vs 7.6%, p=0.04) and mOCS use (57.9% vs 42.1%, p<0.001). Many T2-low asthmatics had evidence of a historically elevated blood eosinophil count (0.35 (0.13, 0.60)).ConclusionsThe UKSAR describes the characteristics of a large cohort of asthmatics referred to UK specialist severe asthma services. It offers the prospect of providing novel insights across a range of research areas and highlights substantial unmet need with poor asthma control, impaired lung function and high exacerbation rates. T2-high phenotypes predominate with significant differences apparent from T2-low patients. However, T2-low patients frequently have prior blood eosinophilia consistent with possible excessive corticosteroid exposure.

Dataset Information

Statin use and asthma control in patients with severe asthma.

Objectives

Study design

Setting

Participants

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Statin use and asthma control in patients with severe asthma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets