Dataset Information

Up-dosing with bilastine results in improved effectiveness in cold contact urticaria.

ABSTRACT: Cold contact urticaria (CCU) is characterized by itchy wheal and flare responses due to the release of histamine and other pro-inflammatory mediators after exposure to cold. The treatment of choice is nonsedating antihistamines, dosages of which may be increased up to fourfold if standard doses are ineffective. Here, we assess the effects of a standard 20 mg dose and up-dosing to 40 and 80 mg of bilastine in reducing the symptoms of CCU and inflammatory mediator release following cold challenge.Twenty patients with CCU were included in this randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-week study. They received placebo, 20, 40 or 80 mg of bilastine daily each for 7 days with 14-day washout periods. The primary readout was change in critical temperature thresholds (CTT). Secondary readouts were changes in pruritus, levels of histamine IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-? collected by skin microdialysis and safety and tolerability of bilastine.Bilastine 20 mg was highly effective (P < 0.0001) in reducing CTT. Up-dosing to 80 mg significantly (P < 0.04) increased its effectiveness. At this dose, 19 of 20 (95%) patients responded to treatment, with 12 of 20 (60%) becoming symptom free. Only one patient was refractory to treatment. Microdialysis levels of histamine, IL-6 and IL-8 assessed 1-3 h after cold challenge were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased following up-dosing with 80 mg bilastine. Bilastine treatment was well tolerated without evidence of increased sedation with dose escalation.Bilastine was effective in reducing the symptoms of patients with CCU. Increased efficacy of bilastine with fourfold up-dosing was without sedation and supports urticaria treatment guidelines.

SUBMITTER: Krause K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3759706 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Up-dosing with bilastine results in improved effectiveness in cold contact urticaria.

Krause K K Spohr A A Zuberbier T T Church M K MK Maurer M M

Allergy 20130606 7

<h4>Background</h4>Cold contact urticaria (CCU) is characterized by itchy wheal and flare responses due to the release of histamine and other pro-inflammatory mediators after exposure to cold. The treatment of choice is nonsedating antihistamines, dosages of which may be increased up to fourfold if standard doses are ineffective. Here, we assess the effects of a standard 20 mg dose and up-dosing to 40 and 80 mg of bilastine in reducing the symptoms of CCU and inflammatory mediator release follow ...[more]

PMID: 23742030

Similar Datasets

Project description:Bilastine, a second-generation antihistamine, is approved in Europe for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria in adults and children aged ??6 years. Pharmacokinetic data for children aged 6-11 years were extracted post hoc from a study in which children (2-11 years) with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis or urticaria received oral bilastine (10 mg/day). Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) data were compared with adult pharmacokinetic data from seven clinical studies (bilastine 20 mg/day). Safety data for children aged 6-11 years were extracted post hoc from a phase III randomized controlled trial of children (2-11 years) with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis or chronic urticaria receiving once-daily bilastine 10 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. Exposure and Cmax values were similar for children (6-11 years) and adults: median pediatric/adult ratios for AUC0-24 and Cmax were 0.93 and 0.91, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse in children (6-11 years) receiving bilastine 10 mg or placebo.Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic and safety analyses in children aged 6-11 years support the suitability of the pediatric dose of bilastine 10 mg and confirm that the safety profiles of bilastine and placebo are similar.What is Known:• Bilastine, a second-generation antihistamine, is approved in Europe for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria in adults (20 mg/day) and children aged ??6 years (10 mg/day).• An ontogenic model based on adult data and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulations supported the selection of a bilastine dose of 10 mg/day in children aged 2-11 years. Bilastine 10 mg/day was shown to have a safety profile similar to that of placebo in a large phase III randomized clinical trial in children aged 2-11 years.What is New:• As bilastine is approved in Europe for children aged ?6 years, the current study reports the results of two post hoc analyses of pharmacokinetic and safety data in children aged 6-11 years.• Analysis of pharmacokinetic and safety data in children aged 6-11 years supports the suitability of the pediatric dose of bilastine 10 mg and confirms that its safety profile is similar to that of placebo.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Mendelian analysis of disorders of immune regulation can provide insight into molecular pathways associated with host defense and immune tolerance. METHODS:We identified three families with a dominantly inherited complex of cold-induced urticaria, antibody deficiency, and susceptibility to infection and autoimmunity. Immunophenotyping methods included flow cytometry, analysis of serum immunoglobulins and autoantibodies, lymphocyte stimulation, and enzymatic assays. Genetic studies included linkage analysis, targeted Sanger sequencing, and next-generation whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS:Cold urticaria occurred in all affected subjects. Other, variable manifestations included atopy, granulomatous rash, autoimmune thyroiditis, the presence of antinuclear antibodies, sinopulmonary infections, and common variable immunodeficiency. Levels of serum IgM and IgA and circulating natural killer cells and class-switched memory B cells were reduced. Linkage analysis showed a 7-Mb candidate interval on chromosome 16q in one family, overlapping by 3.5 Mb a disease-associated haplotype in a smaller family. This interval includes PLCG2, encoding phospholipase C?(2) (PLC?(2)), a signaling molecule expressed in B cells, natural killer cells, and mast cells. Sequencing of complementary DNA revealed heterozygous transcripts lacking exon 19 in two families and lacking exons 20 through 22 in a third family. Genomic sequencing identified three distinct in-frame deletions that cosegregated with disease. These deletions, located within a region encoding an autoinhibitory domain, result in protein products with constitutive phospholipase activity. PLCG2-expressing cells had diminished cellular signaling at 37°C but enhanced signaling at subphysiologic temperatures. CONCLUSIONS:Genomic deletions in PLCG2 cause gain of PLC?(2) function, leading to signaling abnormalities in multiple leukocyte subsets and a phenotype encompassing both excessive and deficient immune function. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Programs and others.).

Project description:BACKGROUND:Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterized by the spontaneous appearance of wheals, angioedema, or both for > 6 weeks. Continuous treatment with H1-antihistamines is used as a first-line treatment for CSU. However, H1-antihistamine treatment leads to absence of symptoms in less than 50% of patients with CSU. Although Japanese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of urticaria recommend an increase in the H1-antihistamine dose or a switch to other H1-antihistamines, there is no evidence supporting a switch to other H1-antihistamines in patients with refractory CSU who are unresponsive to H1-antihistamines at the licensed dose. METHODS:We will conduct a multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized, parallel, comparison study to determine if the efficacy of bilastine 20 mg is not inferior to that of a twofold H1-antihistamine dose increase in patients with refractory CSU who are unresponsive to H1-antihistamines at the licensed dose. This study will be performed at 15 academic hospitals in Japan, and the administration period (increasing the H1-antihistamine dose twofold vs. switching to bilastine 20 mg) will be 7 days. Participants (n = 150) will be randomized to either an increased H1-antihistamine dose or a switch to bilastine 20 mg at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint, mean of the total symptom score of 5-7 days after the intervention, will be evaluated. The secondary objective is to determine if the safety of bilastine 20 mg regarding somnolence is superior to that of a twofold dose increase of H1-antihistamines. This will be measured by a change in the Japanese version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale from baseline to 7 days after starting the intervention. DISCUSSION:This multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized, parallel, comparison study will be, to our knowledge, the first well-designed clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of a switch to other H1-antihistamines in patients with refractory CSU who are unresponsive to H1-antihistamines at the licensed doses. This trial will provide evidence of the efficacy and safety of bilastine when treatment is switched in patients with refractory CSU who are unresponsive to H1-antihistamines at the licensed dose. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT), jRCTs051180105. Registered on 8 March 2019.

Dataset Information

Up-dosing with bilastine results in improved effectiveness in cold contact urticaria.

Publications

Up-dosing with bilastine results in improved effectiveness in cold contact urticaria.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets