Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Effect of a fixed-ratio (1:1:1) transfusion protocol versus laboratory-results-guided transfusion in patients with severe trauma: a randomized feasibility trial.


ABSTRACT: Hemorrhage coupled with coagulopathy remains the leading cause of preventable in-hospital deaths among trauma patients. Use of a transfusion protocol with a predefined ratio of 1:1:1 (1 each of red blood cells [RBC], frozen plasma [FP] and platelets) has been associated with improved survival in retrospective studies in military and civilian settings, but such a protocol has its challenges and may increase the risk of respiratory complications. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility of a 1:1:1 transfusion protocol and its effect on mortality and complications among patients with severe trauma.We included 78 patients seen in a tertiary trauma centre between July 2009 and October 2011 who had hypotension and bleeding and were expected to need massive transfusion (? 10 RBC units in 24 h). We randomly assigned them to either the fixed-ratio (1:1:1) transfusion protocol (n = 40) or to a laboratory-results-guided transfusion protocol (control; n = 38). The primary outcome, feasibility, was assessed in terms of blood product ratios and plasma wastage. Safety was measured based on 28-day mortality and survival free of acute respiratory distress syndrome.Overall, a transfusion ratio of 1:1:1 was achieved in 57% (21/37) of patients in the fixed-ratio group, as compared with 6% (2/32) in the control group. A ratio of 1:1 (RBC:FP) was achieved in 73% (27/37) in the fixed-ratio group and 22% (7/32) in the control group. Plasma wastage was higher with the intervention protocol (22% [86/390] of FP units v. 10% [30/289] in the control group). The 28-day mortality and number of days free of acute respiratory distress syndrome were statistically similar between the groups.The fixed-ratio transfusion protocol was feasible in our study, but it was associated with increased plasma wastage. Larger randomized trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of such a protocol in trauma care.ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT00945542.

SUBMITTER: Nascimento B 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3761040 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Effect of a fixed-ratio (1:1:1) transfusion protocol versus laboratory-results-guided transfusion in patients with severe trauma: a randomized feasibility trial.

Nascimento Bartolomeu B   Callum Jeannie J   Tien Homer H   Rubenfeld Gordon G   Pinto Ruxandra R   Lin Yulia Y   Rizoli Sandro S  

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 20130715 12


<h4>Background</h4>Hemorrhage coupled with coagulopathy remains the leading cause of preventable in-hospital deaths among trauma patients. Use of a transfusion protocol with a predefined ratio of 1:1:1 (1 each of red blood cells [RBC], frozen plasma [FP] and platelets) has been associated with improved survival in retrospective studies in military and civilian settings, but such a protocol has its challenges and may increase the risk of respiratory complications. We conducted a randomized contro  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6419414 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6763975 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7245642 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8074660 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3874740 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9839891 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4374744 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9298397 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5761884 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4101869 | biostudies-literature