Dataset Information

Emerging roles for biomedical librarians: a survey of current practice, challenges, and changes.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

This study is intended to (1) identify emerging roles for biomedical librarians and determine how common these roles are in a variety of library settings, (2) identify barriers to taking on new roles, and (3) determine how librarians are developing the capacity to take on new roles.

Methods

A survey was conducted of librarians in biomedical settings.

Results

Most biomedical librarians are taking on new roles. The most common roles selected by survey respondents include analysis and enhancement of user experiences, support for social media, support for systematic reviews, clinical informationist, help for faculty or staff with authorship issues, and implementation of researcher profiling and collaboration tools. Respondents in academic settings are more likely to report new roles than hospital librarians are, but some new roles are common in both settings. Respondents use a variety of methods to free up time for new roles, but predominant methods vary between directors and librarians and between academic and hospital respondents. Lack of time is the biggest barrier that librarians face when trying to adopt new roles. New roles are associated with increased collaboration with individuals and/or groups outside the library.

Conclusion and implications

This survey documents the widespread incorporation of new roles in biomedical libraries in the United States, as well as the barriers to adopting these roles and the means by which librarians are making time for them. The results of the survey can be used to inform strategic planning, succession planning, library education, and career development for biomedical librarians.

SUBMITTER: Crum JA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3794683 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Emerging roles for biomedical librarians: a survey of current practice, challenges, and changes.

Crum Janet A JA Cooper I Diane ID

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA 20131001 4

<h4>Objective</h4>This study is intended to (1) identify emerging roles for biomedical librarians and determine how common these roles are in a variety of library settings, (2) identify barriers to taking on new roles, and (3) determine how librarians are developing the capacity to take on new roles.<h4>Methods</h4>A survey was conducted of librarians in biomedical settings.<h4>Results</h4>Most biomedical librarians are taking on new roles. The most common roles selected by survey respondents in ...[more]

PMID: 24163599

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveWhile many librarians have been asked to participate in systematic reviews with researchers, often these researchers are not familiar with the systematic review process or the appropriate role for librarians. The purpose of this study was to identify the challenges and barriers that librarians face when collaborating on systematic reviews. To take a wider view of the whole process of collaborating on systematic reviews, the authors deliberately focused on interpersonal and methodological issues other than searching itself.MethodsTo characterize the biggest challenges that librarians face while collaborating on systematic review projects, we used a web-based survey. The thirteen-item survey included seventeen challenges grouped into two categories: methodological and interpersonal. Participants were required to indicate the frequency and difficulty of the challenges listed. Open-ended questions allowed survey participants to describe challenges not listed in the survey and to describe strategies used to overcome challenges.ResultsOf the 17 challenges listed in the survey, 8 were reported as common by over 40% of respondents. These included methodological issues around having too broad or narrow research questions, lacking eligibility criteria, having unclear research questions, and not following established methods. The remaining challenges were interpersonal, including issues around student-led projects and the size of the research team. Of the top 8 most frequent challenges, 5 were also ranked as most difficult to handle. Open-ended responses underscored many of the challenges included in the survey and revealed several additional challenges.ConclusionsThese results suggest that the most frequent and challenging issues relate to development of the research question and general communication with team members. Clear protocols for collaboration on systematic reviews, as well as a culture of mentorship, can help librarians prevent and address these challenges.

Project description:IntroductionWith the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and systemic antibodies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, the survival of advanced-stage cancer patients has improved for many tumor types. These patients are increasingly referred for radiotherapy, but it is unclear whether radiotherapy combined with these drugs is safe. No international guidelines exist on whether or how to combine these drugs with radiotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the current clinical practice in the Netherlands regarding hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients using targeted drugs and immunotherapy.Materials and methodsWe sent a survey to all 21 Dutch radiotherapy institutes. Dedicated radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and pulmonologists were asked to fill out the survey. The questions explored their familiarity with the combination of targeted drugs and immunotherapy with radiotherapy, the encountered clinical difficulties and factors influencing treatment decisions.ResultsThe survey was filled out by 54 respondents from 19 different institutes. The median annual number of patients per radiation oncologist referred for radiotherapy when using targeted drugs or immunotherapy was 10 and 15, respectively. Despite this high number, only 11% of the radiation oncologists stated that they had sufficient information (resources) for adequate treatment decision making. Among all physicians, 44% stated that there was insufficient knowledge within their institute regarding this topic. Only 17% stated that there was a multidisciplinary protocol available. The application of radiotherapy treatment adaptations (technique, dose, fractionation, field size) varied widely. Generally, there seemed to be no consensus regarding the expected toxicity of combined drug-radiotherapy treatments and the expected risk of tumor flare upon temporary drug discontinuation.ConclusionThere is no consensus amongst involved medical specialties on expected toxicity. Consequently, it is necessary to perform clinical studies examining the safety of combined drug-radiotherapy treatments, to add radiotherapy to phase I-III clinical trials for new drugs and to incorporate outcomes into multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines.

Dataset Information

Emerging roles for biomedical librarians: a survey of current practice, challenges, and changes.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion and implications

Publications

Emerging roles for biomedical librarians: a survey of current practice, challenges, and changes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets