Dataset Information

The first identification of carbohydrate binding modules specific to chitosan.

ABSTRACT: Two carbohydrate binding modules (DD1 and DD2) belonging to CBM32 are located at the C terminus of a chitosanase from Paenibacillus sp. IK-5. We produced three proteins, DD1, DD2, and tandem DD1/DD2 (DD1+DD2), and characterized their binding ability. Transition temperature of thermal unfolding (Tm) of each protein was elevated by the addition of cello-, laminari-, chitin-, or chitosan-hexamer (GlcN)6. The Tm elevation (?Tm) in DD1 was the highest (10.3 °C) upon the addition of (GlcN)6 and was markedly higher than that in DD2 (1.0 °C). A synergistic effect was observed (?Tm = 13.6 °C), when (GlcN)6 was added to DD1+DD2. From isothermal titration calorimetry experiments, affinities to DD1 were not clearly dependent upon chain length of (GlcN)n; ?Gr° values were -7.8 (n = 6), -7.6 (n = 5), -7.6 (n = 4), -7.6 (n = 3), and -7.1 (n = 2) kcal/mol, and the value was not obtained for GlcN due to the lowest affinity. DD2 bound (GlcN)n with the lower affinities (?Gr° = -5.0 (n = 3) ~ -5.2 (n = 6) kcal/mol). Isothermal titration calorimetry profiles obtained for DD1+DD2 exhibited a better fit when the two-site model was used for analysis and provided greater affinities to (GlcN)6 for individual DD1 and DD2 sites (?Gr° = -8.6 and -6.4 kcal/mol, respectively). From NMR titration experiments, (GlcN)n (n = 2~6) were found to bind to loops extruded from the core ?-sandwich of individual DD1 and DD2, and the interaction sites were similar to each other. Taken together, DD1+DD2 is specific to chitosan, and individual modules synergistically interact with at least two GlcN units, facilitating chitosan hydrolysis.

SUBMITTER: Shinya S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3798473 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The first identification of carbohydrate binding modules specific to chitosan.

Shinya Shoko S Ohnuma Takayuki T Yamashiro Reina R Kimoto Hisashi H Kusaoke Hideo H Anbazhagan Padmanabhan P Juffer André H AH Fukamizo Tamo T

The Journal of biological chemistry 20130828 42

Two carbohydrate binding modules (DD1 and DD2) belonging to CBM32 are located at the C terminus of a chitosanase from Paenibacillus sp. IK-5. We produced three proteins, DD1, DD2, and tandem DD1/DD2 (DD1+DD2), and characterized their binding ability. Transition temperature of thermal unfolding (Tm) of each protein was elevated by the addition of cello-, laminari-, chitin-, or chitosan-hexamer (GlcN)6. The Tm elevation (ΔTm) in DD1 was the highest (10.3 °C) upon the addition of (GlcN)6 and was ma ...[more]

PMID: 23986450

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Effective enzymatic degradation of crystalline polysaccharides requires a synergistic cocktail of hydrolytic enzymes tailored to the wide-ranging degree of substrate crystallinity. To accomplish this type of targeted carbohydrate recognition, nature produces multi-modular enzymes, having at least one catalytic domain appended to one or more carbohydrate binding modules (CBMs). The Type B CBM categorization encompasses several families (i.e., protein folds) of CBMs that are generally thought to selectively bind oligomeric polysaccharides; however, a subset of cellulose-specific CBM families (17 and 28) appear to bind non-crystalline cellulose more tightly than oligomers and in a manner that discriminates between surface topology. Results:To provide insight into this unexplained phenomenon, we investigated the molecular-level origins of oligomeric and non-crystalline carbohydrate recognition in cellulose-specific Type B CBMs using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and free energy calculations. Examining two CBMs from three different families (4, 17, and 28), we describe how protein-ligand dynamics contribute to observed variations in binding affinity of oligomers within the same CBM family. Comparisons across the three CBM families identified factors leading to modified functionality prohibiting competitive binding, despite similarity in sequence and specificity. Using free energy perturbation with Hamiltonian replica exchange MD, we also examined the hypothesis that the open topology of the binding grooves in families 17 and 28 necessitates tight binding of an oligomer, while the more confined family 4 binding groove does not require the same degree of tight binding. Finally, we elucidated the mechanisms of non-crystalline carbohydrate recognition by modeling CBMs complexed with a partially decrystallized cellulose substrate. Molecular simulation provided structural and dynamic data for direct comparison to oligomeric modes of carbohydrate recognition, and umbrella sampling MD was used to determine ligand binding free energy. Comparing both protein-carbohydrate interactions and ligand binding free energies, which were in good agreement with experimental values, we confirmed the hypothesis that family 17 and 28 CBMs bind non-crystalline cellulose and oligomers with different affinities (i.e., high and low). Conclusions:Our study provides an unprecedented level of insight into the complex solid and soluble carbohydrate substrate recognition mechanisms of Type B CBMs, the findings of which hold considerable promise for enhancing lignocellulosic biomass conversion technology and development of plant cell wall probes.

Dataset Information

The first identification of carbohydrate binding modules specific to chitosan.

Publications

The first identification of carbohydrate binding modules specific to chitosan.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets