Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

What can article-level metrics do for you?

ABSTRACT: Article-level metrics (ALMs) provide a wide range of metrics about the uptake of an individual journal article by the scientific community after publication. They include citations, usage statistics, discussions in online comments and social media, social bookmarking, and recommendations. In this essay, we describe why article-level metrics are an important extension of traditional citation-based journal metrics and provide a number of example from ALM data collected for PLOS Biology.

SUBMITTER: Fenner M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3805468 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

What can article-level metrics do for you?

Fenner Martin M

PLoS biology 20131022 10

Article-level metrics (ALMs) provide a wide range of metrics about the uptake of an individual journal article by the scientific community after publication. They include citations, usage statistics, discussions in online comments and social media, social bookmarking, and recommendations. In this essay, we describe why article-level metrics are an important extension of traditional citation-based journal metrics and provide a number of example from ALM data collected for PLOS Biology. ...[more]

PMID: 24167445

Similar Datasets

The Question of Data Integrity in Article-Level Metrics.

Project description:Interest in and use of article-level metrics (ALMs) has grown rapidly amongst the research community, by researchers, publishers, funders, and research institutions. As this happens, it is critical to ensure secure and reliable data that is trustworthy and can be used by all. Two case studies are presented, which illustrate different approaches to establishing ALM data integrity.

| S-EPMC4546647 | biostudies-other

The spread of scientific information: insights from the web usage statistics in PLoS article-level metrics.

Project description:The presence of web-based communities is a distinctive signature of Web 2.0. The web-based feature means that information propagation within each community is highly facilitated, promoting complex collective dynamics in view of information exchange. In this work, we focus on a community of scientists and study, in particular, how the awareness of a scientific paper is spread. Our work is based on the web usage statistics obtained from the PLoS Article Level Metrics dataset compiled by PLoS. The cumulative number of HTML views was found to follow a long tail distribution which is reasonably well-fitted by a lognormal one. We modeled the diffusion of information by a random multiplicative process, and thus extracted the rates of information spread at different stages after the publication of a paper. We found that the spread of information displays two distinct decay regimes: a rapid downfall in the first month after publication, and a gradual power law decay afterwards. We identified these two regimes with two distinct driving processes: a short-term behavior driven by the fame of a paper, and a long-term behavior consistent with citation statistics. The patterns of information spread were found to be remarkably similar in data from different journals, but there are intrinsic differences for different types of web usage (HTML views and PDF downloads versus XML). These similarities and differences shed light on the theoretical understanding of different complex systems, as well as a better design of the corresponding web applications that is of high potential marketing impact.

| S-EPMC3095621 | biostudies-literature

Does origin of article impact citation metrics in <i>Gynecologic Oncology?</i>

Project description:ObjectivesTo determine if the origin of article published in Gynecologic Oncology ("Journal") is correlated with quality of the article when measured per US institution and per country, using an index of citation (IOC) metric as a stand-in for article quality.MethodsPubMed was used to query the Journal from 2005 to 2020. Articles not deemed original research were excluded. A US-only cohort ("US-Only") was evaluated separately from the entire cohort ("Whole"). The IOC for each article was calculated by dividing the number of citations listed in PubMed by the days from the publication date to 9/1/2021. The IOC per US institution was summarized by the median value. All articles were hand reviewed for correctness. The Whole cohort included all countries with 3 or more publications (including all of the US-Only cohort) and underwent similar analysis. Correlation coefficients were estimated using Pearson's correlation after log-transformation.ResultsIn the US-only cohort, 2733 articles from 276 institutions within the US contributed original articles to the Journal. The association between the number of publications per institution and the median IOC was not well correlated (Pearson's Correlation coeffeicient r = 0.16, p = 0.009). In the Whole cohort, 5,848 original research articles were published from 40 countries. There was no difference between median IOC for articles from US compared to non-US institutions was (0.0026 vs 0.0027, p = 0.287). The US median IOC was ranked 17/40. The US accounted for just over half (51.2%) of publications, and there was a trend of decreasing Non-US publications over time (p = 0.0004).ConclusionsThe Journal was fairly consistent in the quality of articles published over the 15-year study period when using the IOC as a surrogate for quality, regardless of the article's country or US institution of origin.

| S-EPMC8933665 | biostudies-literature

Article-level assessment of influence and translation in biomedical research.

Project description:Given the vast scale of the modern scientific enterprise, it can be difficult for scientists to make judgments about the work of others through careful analysis of the entirety of the relevant literature. This has led to a reliance on metrics that are mathematically flawed and insufficiently diverse to account for the variety of ways in which investigators contribute to scientific progress. An urgent, critical first step in solving this problem is replacing the Journal Impact Factor with an article-level alternative. The Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), a metric that was designed to serve in that capacity, measures the influence of each publication on its respective area of research. RCR can serve as one component of a multifaceted metric that provides an effective data-driven supplement to expert opinion. Developing validated methods that quantify scientific progress can help to optimize the management of research investments and accelerate the acquisition of knowledge that improves human health.

| S-EPMC5449139 | biostudies-other

Project description:Estimates of changes in the frequency or height of contemporary extreme sea levels (ESLs) under various climate change scenarios are often used by climate and sea level scientists to help communicate the physical basis for societal concern regarding sea level rise. Changes in ESLs (i.e., the hazard) are often represented using various metrics and indicators that, when anchored to salient impacts on human systems and the natural environment, provide useful information to policy makers, stakeholders, and the general public. While changes in hazards are often anchored to impacts at local scales, aggregate global summary metrics generally lack the context of local exposure and vulnerability that facilitates translating hazards into impacts. Contextualizing changes in hazards is also needed when communicating the timing of when projected ESL frequencies cross critical thresholds, such as the year in which ESLs higher than the design height benchmark of protective infrastructure (e.g., the 100-year water level) are expected to occur within the lifetime of that infrastructure. We present specific examples demonstrating the need for such contextualization using a simple flood exposure model, local sea level rise projections, and population exposure estimates for 414 global cities. We suggest regional and global climate assessment reports integrate global, regional, and local perspectives on coastal risk to address hazard, vulnerability and exposure simultaneously.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10584-021-03288-6.

| S-EPMC8847277 | biostudies-literature

Additional support for RCR: A validated article-level measure of scientific influence.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5624567 | biostudies-literature

chem16S: community-level chemical metrics for exploring genomic adaptation to environments.

Project description:SummaryThe chem16S package combines taxonomic classifications of 16S rRNA gene sequences with amino acid compositions of prokaryotic reference proteomes to generate community reference proteomes. Taxonomic classifications from the RDP Classifier or data objects created by the phyloseq R package are supported. Users can calculate and visualize a variety of chemical metrics in order to explore the effects of redox, salinity, and other physicochemical variables on the genomic adaptation of protein sequences at the community level.Availability and implementationDevelopment of chem16S is hosted at https://github.com/jedick/chem16S. Version 1.0.0 is freely available from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) at https://cran.r-project.org/package=chem16S.

| S-EPMC10505500 | biostudies-literature

Evaluation of Tissue-Level Brain Injury Metrics Using Species-Specific Simulations.

Project description:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health burden, and the development of advanced countermeasures to mitigate and prevent these injuries during automotive, sports, and military impact events requires an understanding of the intracranial mechanisms related to TBI. In this study, the efficacy of tissue-level injury metrics for predicting TBI was evaluated using finite element reconstructions from a comprehensive, multi-species TBI database. The database consisted of human volunteer tests, laboratory-reconstructed head impacts from sports, in vivo non-human primate (NHP) tests, and in vivo pig tests. Eight tissue-level metrics related to brain tissue strain, axonal strain, and strain-rate were evaluated using survival analysis for predicting mild and severe TBI risk. The correlation between TBI risk and most of the assessed metrics were statistically significant, but when injury data was analyzed by species, the best metric was often inconclusive and limited by the small datasets. When the human and animal datasets were combined, the injury analysis was able to delineate maximum axonal strain as the best predictor of injury for all species and TBI severities, with maximum principal strain as a suitable alternative metric. The current study is the first to provide evidence to support the assumption that brain strain response between human, pig, and NHP result in similar injury outcomes through a multi-species analysis. This assumption is the biomechanical foundation for translating animal brain injury findings to humans. The findings in the study provide fundamental guidelines for developing injury criteria that would contribute towards the innovation of more effective safety countermeasures.

| S-EPMC8219195 | biostudies-literature

Article

Project description:This paper introduces a new cross-platform programming framework for developing quantum-accelerated scientific computing applications and executing them on most of today’s cloud-based quantum computers and simulators. It makes use of C++ template meta-programming techniques to implement quantum algorithms as generic, platform-independent expressions, which get automatically synthesized into device-specific compute kernels upon execution. Our software framework supports concurrent and asynchronous execution of multiple quantum kernels via a CUDA-inspired stream concept.

| S-EPMC7304771 | biostudies-literature

Article

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC2134823 | biostudies-literature