Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

14 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Linagliptin as add-on therapy to insulin for patients with type 2 diabetes.

ABSTRACT: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a highly prevalent, progressive disease that often is poorly controlled. The combination of an incretin-based therapy and insulin is a promising approach to optimize the management of glycemic control without hypoglycemia and weight gain. Linagliptin, a recently approved oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, has a unique pharmacological profile. The convenient, once-daily dosing does not need adjustment in patients with hepatic and/or renal impairment. In clinical studies linagliptin shows an important reduction of blood glucose with an overall safety profile similar to that of placebo. So far, the combination of linagliptin and insulin has been tested in three major clinical studies in different populations. It has been shown that linagliptin is an effective and safe add-on therapy to insulin in patients with T2DM. The efficacy and safety of this combination was also shown in vulnerable, elderly T2DM patients and in patients with T2DM and renal impairment. Favorable effects regarding the counteraction of hypoglycemia make linagliptin especially interesting as an add-on therapy to insulin. This review aims to present the existing clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of linagliptin as add-on therapy to insulin in patients with T2DM in the context of current literature. Additionally, the possible advantages of linagliptin as an add-on therapy to insulin in relation to cardiovascular safety, patient-centered therapy and the prevention of hypoglycemia, are discussed.

SUBMITTER: von Websky K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3818026 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Metformin add-on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion on precise insulin doses in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Project description:To investigate whether metformin add-on to the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (Met + CSII) therapy leads to a significant reduction in insulin doses required by type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients to maintain glycemic control, and an improvement in glycemic variation (GV) compared to CSII only therapy. We analyzed data from our two randomized, controlled open-label trials. Newly diagnoses T2D patients were randomized assigned to receive either CSII therapy or Met + CSII therapy for 4 weeks. Subjects were subjected to a 4-day continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) at the endpoint. Insulin doses and GV profiles were analyzed. The primary endpoint was differences in insulin doses and GV between the two groups. A total of 188 subjects were admitted as inpatients. Subjects in metformin add-on therapy required significantly lower total, basal and bolus insulin doses than those of control group. CGM data showed that patients in Met + CSII group exhibited significant reduction in the 24-hr mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), the standard deviation, and the coefficient of variation compared to those of control group. Our data suggest that metformin add-on to CSII therapy leads to a significant reduction in insulin doses required by T2D patients to control glycemic variations.

| S-EPMC6018811 | biostudies-literature

Effects of Vildagliptin Add-on Insulin Therapy on Nocturnal Glycemic Variations in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes.

Project description:IntroductionTo investigate whether vildagliptin add-on insulin therapy improves glycemic variations in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared to patients with placebo therapy.MethodsThis was a 24-week, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Inadequately controlled T2D patients treated with insulin therapy were recruited between June 2012 and April 2013. The trial included a 2-week screening period and a 24-week randomized period. Subjects were randomly assigned to a vildagliptin add-on insulin therapy group (n = 17) or a matched placebo group (n = 16). Scheduled visits occurred at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed before and at the endpoint of the study.ResultsA total of 33 subjects were admitted, with 1 patient withdrawing from the placebo group. After 24 weeks of therapy, HbA1c values were significantly reduced at the endpoint in the vildagliptin add-on group. CGM data showed that patients with vildagliptin add-on therapy had a significantly lower 24-h mean glucose concentration and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE). At the endpoint of the study, patients in the vildagliptin add-on group had a significantly lower MAGE and standard deviation compared to the control patients during the nocturnal period (0000-0600). A severe hypoglycemic episode was not observed in either group.ConclusionVildagliptin add-on therapy to insulin has the ability to improve glycemic variations, especially during the nocturnal time period, in patients with uncontrolled T2D.

| S-EPMC5630558 | biostudies-literature

Initial combination therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: considerations for metformin plus linagliptin.

Project description:For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, management of hyperglycemia is typically complex, and few patients successfully achieve and maintain recommended targets for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Increasingly, combination therapy is recommended early in the disease course, or even directly at diagnosis in patients with relatively high HbA1c levels. A recent randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial investigated the initial combination of linagliptin and metformin in patients with inadequate glycemic control to assess the benefits of initial combination compared with monotherapy. Linagliptin and metformin act in complementary ways, and the combination treatment showed superior efficacy compared with either monotherapy. Notably, responses were largest in patients with higher baseline HbA1c levels compared with moderate levels, suggesting this combination could be considered in these patients. This may be particularly relevant for those unwilling to start insulin because they prefer oral therapy or need to avoid body weight gain. Neither metformin nor linagliptin is associated with weight gain, and in this trial the combination was also weight neutral. As this combination therapy was well tolerated, with a low frequency of hypoglycemia, these findings suggest that initial combination of linagliptin plus metformin may have advantages for a large proportion of patients in clinical practice.

| S-EPMC3884752 | biostudies-literature

Linagliptin-a novel dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor for type 2 diabetes therapy.

Project description:Incretin based therapies have been introduced into the treatment options of type 2 diabetes a few years ago. Among them, the orally active DPP-4 inhibitors have established themselves as insulinotropic agents. Their advantage is the glucose-dependent insulinotropic action without an intrinsic risk for causing hypoglycemia. Additionally DPP-4 inhibitors have a glucose dependent glucagonostatic action contributing to improved glucose control. They are weight neutral and show a good safety and tolerability profile with comparable efficacy to sulfonylureas. Linagliptin is a novel DPP-4 inhibitor with a distinct pharmacological profile. In contrast to the other approved DPP-4 inhibitors it is eliminated by a hepatic/biliary route rather than a renal route. Therefore no dose adjustment is recommended in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal impairment. In clinical studies, it has been shown to be non-inferior to sulfonylurea treatment regarding glycemic parameters, but to possess favourable safety advantages regarding hypoglycemia frequency, body weight development and effects on cardioavascular parameters. This article gives an overview on the pharmacology of linagliptin as well as on the clinical data available.

| S-EPMC3411498 | biostudies-literature

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as add-on therapy to insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Project description:Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) used as an adjunct to insulin therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods: A search of electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from 1 January 1950 to 23 May 2021 was conducted to find randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c. Eight efficacy and six safety secondary endpoints were evaluated via meta-analysis. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR), alongside 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated using the random effects model. Results: Among 1,379 candidate studies, 11 trials comprising 2,856 participants satisfied the inclusion criteria. Overall, GLP-1 RA adjunctive therapy reduced HbA1c by -0.21% (95% CI, -0.33 to -0.10), weight by -4.04 kg (-4.8 to -3.27), systolic pressure by -2.57 mmHg (-4.11 to -1.03), and diastolic blood pressure by -1.02 mmHg (-1.99 to -0.06). In addition, there was a decrease in prandial insulin dose (WMD, -4.23 IU; 95% CI, -5.26 to -3.20), basal insulin dose (-2.40 IU; -3.93 to -0.87), and total insulin dose (-5.73 IU; -10.61 to -0.86). Moreover, GLP-1 RAs did not increase the incidence of severe hypoglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, or severe adverse events. However, GLP-1 RAs increased the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.33-3.77). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials suggests moderate beneficial effects of GLP-1 RAs on the metabolic profile in patients with type 1 diabetes, without an increased risk of serious adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO; Identifier: CRD 42020199840.

| S-EPMC10797415 | biostudies-literature

Comparison of non-insulin antidiabetic agents as an add-on drug to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis.

Project description:We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), or thiazolidinedione (TZD) as an adjunctive treatment in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on insulin therapy. We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through April 2016. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed with covariate adjustment. The primary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline. Fifty randomized controlled trials covering 15,494 patients were included. GLP-1RA showed the greatest HbA1c-lowering effect compared to the control (-0.84%; 95% credible interval, -1.00% to -0.69%), followed by TZD (-0.73%; -0.93 to -0.52%), SGLT2i (-0.66%; -0.84% to -0.48%), and DPP4i (-0.54%; -0.68% to -0.39%). SGLT2i showed the greatest fasting plasma glucose reduction. GLP-1RA and SGLT2i showed greater body weight reduction, whereas TZD increased body weight. TZD was ranked the highest in terms of insulin dose reduction. The risk of hypoglycemia was increased with TZD or GLP-1RA. The study provides the best available evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of non-insulin anti-diabetic agents on top of pre-existing insulin therapy for inadequately controlled T2DM patients.

| S-EPMC5840350 | biostudies-literature

Effect of empagliflozin versus linagliptin on body composition in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes treated with premixed insulin.

Project description:Insulin therapy often increases body weight and leads to visceral fat accumulation. Progression in diabetes is also associated with accelerated loss of muscle mass. Little is known about body composition changes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients on insulin therapy who use sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors. This study examined the effect of 25 mg of empagliflozin compared with 5 mg of linagliptin for 24 weeks on body weight and body composition in patients with T2DM on premixed insulin. Body composition was assessed with bioelectrical impedance analysis. The mean difference between the linagliptin and empagliflozin groups in terms of mean body weight change from baseline to 24 weeks was - 1.80 kg (95% CI - 2.57, - 1.03). Empagliflozin also significantly reduced muscle mass (- 1.39 kg, 95% CI - 2.49, - 0.29) and total body water (- 1.07 kg, 95% CI - 1.88, - 0.27) compared with linagliptin. Compared to linagliptin, empagliflozin decreased body fat mass more from baseline to week 24, but this was not significant (- 0.31 kg, 95% CI - 1.51, 0.90). Further research on insulin-treated T2DM patients is necessary to investigate the long-term effects of SGLT2 and DPP4 inhibitors on body composition, as well as their effects on muscle strength and physical function.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03458715, registration date: March 8, 2018.

| S-EPMC9556548 | biostudies-literature

Meta-Analysis of 11 Heterogeneous Studies regarding Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor Add-On Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Treated with Insulin.

Project description:BackgroundSeveral clinical trials have addressed the therapeutic strategy of adding dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) inadequately controlled by insulin therapy. However, there is a high degree of heterogeneity in these studies, and the cause of which has not been identified.MethodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, which compared the efficacy and safety of adding DPP-4 inhibitors or placebo to insulin therapy; the level of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in the patients was >7.0%, and the duration of treatment was ≥8 weeks. We focused on the mean changes in HbA1c from the baseline (ΔHbA1c) and the incidence of hypoglycemia. We assumed that five baseline parameters (HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, body mass index (BMI), duration of type 2 DM, and duration of treatment) could affect ΔHbA1c. Regarding the incidence of hypoglycemia, we suspected that the heterogeneity was caused by differences in the definition of hypoglycemia among the studies.ResultsData obtained from 11 studies (n = 4654 patients) were included in the analysis. The mean ΔHbA1c between the DPP-4 inhibitor and placebo groups was -0.61% (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.74 to -0.48, I 2 = 73.4%). There was substantial heterogeneity among the 11 studies, but 74.1% of this variability was explained by the difference in BMI. The odds ratio for the incidence of hypoglycemia was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.42, I 2 = 63.8%), with substantial heterogeneity due to differences in the definition of hypoglycemia among the studies. There was no apparent effect of publication bias.ConclusionsThe addition of DPP-4 inhibitors to insulin therapy for adult patients with type 2 DM can significantly reduce HbA1c levels without increasing the occurrence of hypoglycemia. BMI and hypoglycemia definition could explain the heterogeneity in the clinical trials. This trial is registered with PROSPERO #CRD42016035994.

| S-EPMC7673952 | biostudies-literature

Clinical outcomes of basal insulin and oral antidiabetic agents as an add-on to dual therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Project description:While basal insulin remains the most effective antidiabetic agent and substantially reduces the risk of hypoglycemia, few studies have examined the comparative effect of basal insulin in the real-world setting. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of adding basal insulin compared with thiazolidinediones (TZDs) or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) as a third antidiabetic agent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A retrospective cohort study involving T2DM was conducted with health administrative data in Taiwan. Patients starting a third antidiabetic agent after receiving a metformin-containing dual combination were identified. The study endpoints included composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), all-cause mortality, and hypoglycemia. Propensity score matching and Cox modeling were used for analysis. After matching, the basal insulin and TZD groups contained 6,101 and 11,823 patients, respectively, and the basal insulin and DPP-4i groups contained 6,051 and 11,900 patients, respectively. TZDs and DPP-4is were both associated with similar risks of MACEs and hypoglycemia but a lower risk of all-cause mortality than basal insulin (TZDs: HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81; DPP-4is: HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.82). Further studies are needed to elucidate the findings of increased all-cause mortality risk in patients receiving basal insulin, especially those with advanced diabetes.

| S-EPMC7113251 | biostudies-literature

Efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin add-on therapy to insulin in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

Project description:AimTo assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily ipragliflozin 50 mg versus placebo in Japanese people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) inadequately controlled with insulin.Materials and methodsWe conducted a multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Participants (N = 175) were randomized (2:1) to receive once-daily ipragliflozin 50 mg (n = 115) or placebo (n = 60), combined with insulin, for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c); key secondary endpoints included change in insulin dose and body weight. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated.ResultsThe ipragliflozin group demonstrated a significant decrease in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment versus the placebo group: adjusted mean difference (AMD) -3.8 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] -6.2, -1.5) or - 0.36% (95% CI -0.57, -0.14; P = 0.001). Significant reductions in total daily insulin dose (AMD -7.35 IU [95% CI -9.09, -5.61]; P < 0.001) and body weight (AMD -2.87 kg [95% CI -3.58, -2.16]; P < 0.001) were observed for the ipragliflozin group versus placebo. Two serious TEAEs occurred (major hypoglycaemia and abdominal abscess); both were in the placebo group. All other TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Four cases of study discontinuation occurred; three in the placebo group and one in the ipragliflozin group. No diabetic ketoacidosis was reported for any participant in this study.ConclusionsDaily ipragliflozin 50 mg in combination with insulin significantly reduced HbA1c, daily insulin dose and body weight versus placebo in people with T1DM. No safety concerns were identified after 24 weeks of treatment. Overall, once-daily ipragliflozin 50 mg was both efficacious and well tolerated.

| S-EPMC6772182 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data