Dataset Information

Differences in outcome according to Clostridium difficile testing method: a prospective multicentre diagnostic validation study of C difficile infection.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection is controversial because of many laboratory methods, compounded by two reference methods. Cytotoxigenic culture detects toxigenic C difficile and gives a positive result more frequently (eg, because of colonisation, which means that individuals can have the bacterium but no free toxin) than does the cytotoxin assay, which detects preformed toxin in faeces. We aimed to validate the reference methods according to clinical outcomes and to derive an optimum laboratory diagnostic algorithm for C difficile infection.

Methods

In this prospective, multicentre study, we did cytotoxigenic culture and cytotoxin assays on 12,420 faecal samples in four UK laboratories. We also performed tests that represent the three main targets for C difficile detection: bacterium (glutamate dehydrogenase), toxins, or toxin genes. We used routine blood test results, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality to clinically validate the reference methods. Data were categorised by reference method result: group 1, cytotoxin assay positive; group 2, cytotoxigenic culture positive and cytotoxin assay negative; and group 3, both reference methods negative.

Findings

Clinical and reference assay data were available for 6522 inpatient episodes. On univariate analysis, mortality was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (72/435 [16·6%] vs 20/207 [9·7%], p=0·044) and in group 3 (503/5880 [8·6%], p<0·001), but not in group 2 compared with group 3 (p=0·4). A multivariate analysis accounting for potential confounders confirmed the mortality differences between groups 1 and 3 (OR 1·61, 95% CI 1·12-2·31). Multistage algorithms performed better than did standalone assays.

Interpretation

We noted no increase in mortality when toxigenic C difficile alone was present. Toxin (cytotoxin assay) positivity correlated with clinical outcome, and so this reference method best defines true cases of C difficile infection. A new diagnostic category of potential C difficile excretor (cytotoxigenic culture positive but cytotoxin assay negative) could be used to characterise patients with diarrhoea that is probably not due to C difficile infection, but who can cause cross-infection.

SUBMITTER: Planche TD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3822406 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionAs data from Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in intensive care unit (ICU) are still scarce, our objectives were to assess the morbidity and mortality of ICU-acquired CDI.MethodsWe compared patients with ICU-acquired CDI (watery or unformed stools occurring ? 72 hours after ICU admission with a stool sample positive for C. difficile toxin A or B) with two groups of controls hospitalized at the same time in the same unit. The first control group comprised patients with ICU-acquired diarrhea occurring ? 72 hours after ICU admission with a stool sample negative for C. difficile and for toxin A or B. The second group comprised patients without any diarrhea.ResultsAmong 5,260 patients, 512 patients developed one episode of diarrhea. Among them, 69 (13.5%) had a CDI; 10 (14.5%) of them were community-acquired, contrasting with 12 (17.4%) that were hospital-acquired and 47 (68%) that were ICU-acquired. A pseudomembranous colitis was associated in 24/47 (51%) ICU patients. The median delay between diagnosis and metronidazole administration was one day (25th Quartile; 75th Quartile (0; 2) days). The case-fatality rate for patients with ICU-acquired CDI was 10/47 (21.5%), as compared to 112/443 (25.3%) for patients with negative tests. Neither the crude mortality (cause specific hazard ratio; CSHR = 0.70, 95% confidence interval; CI 0.36 to 1.35, P = 0.3) nor the adjusted mortality to confounding variables (CSHR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.64, P = 0.6) were significantly different between CDI patients and diarrheic patients without CDI. Compared to the general ICU population, neither the crude mortality (SHR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.21, P = 0.17), nor the mortality adjusted to confounding variables (CSHR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 1.35, P = 0.3), were significantly different between the two groups. The estimated increase in the duration of stay due to CDI was 8.0 days ± 9.3 days, (P = 0.4) in comparison to the diarrheic population, and 6.3 days ± 4.3 (P = 0.14) in comparison to the general ICU population.ConclusionsIf treated early, ICU-acquired CDI is not independently associated with an increased mortality and impacts marginally the ICU length of stay.

Project description:Abstract Background Patient perspectives on their disease are undoubtedly important in clinical trials and in practice. To date, no patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire assessing symptoms of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been developed following FDA guidance. The CDI-DaySyms™ is a new comprehensive measure of a broad range of local and systemic CDI symptoms (not only diarrhea) that patients report as meaningful. Objectives were to: finalize the CDI-DaySyms™ items (questions); assign them to domains (concepts); evaluate the questionnaire’s measurement properties; and define responder thresholds. Methods Blinded data from a sub-study of two Phase III trials (NCT01987895 and NCT01983683) in CDI patients were analyzed following FDA guidance for validating PRO questionnaires. Patients completed the CDI-DaySyms™ daily from Day 1 until end of treatment. Items were selected for inclusion in the final questionnaire based on a range of validation analyses, input from expert clinicians, and findings from prior qualitative patient research. Responder-threshold analyses used Day-3 data to align with the rapid symptom improvement generally seen in response to CDI therapy. Results Data were analyzed for 168 CDI patients (median age 60 years; 67.9% female; 81.5% mild/moderate, 11.3% severe, 7.1% unknown disease severity; 80.4% first CDI occurrence, 19.6% first recurrence). Three of the 13 items in the draft CDI-DaySyms™ were deleted; the remaining 10 were statistically assigned to three domains measuring different symptom concepts (Figure). Individual items in each domain correlated strongly with one another and their domain. Domain scores demonstrated acceptable consistency over time in stable patients, were sensitive to change, and correlated in expected directions with scores of other relevant symptom and disease-severity measures. Responder thresholds were defined as score changes of -1.00, -0.80, and -0.70 for Diarrhea, Abdominal, and Systemic/Other Symptoms domain scores, respectively. Conclusion The CDI-DaySyms™ is a valid measure of diarrhea and other CDI symptoms useful in assessing response to therapy. It has good measurement properties, and with only 10 items can be easily administered in clinical trials and in practice. Disclosures G. H. Talbot, Actelion: Board Member, Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; L. Kleinman, Actelion: Consultant, Research support; ? E. W. Davies, Actelion: Employee, Salary; E. Hunsche, Actelion: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; L. Roberts, Actelion: Consultant, Research support; C. E. Nord, Actelion: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee

Project description:Rifaximin is a rifampicin derivative, poorly absorbed by the gastro-intestinal tract. We studied the in vitro susceptibility to rifamixin of 1082 Clostridium difficile isolates; among these, 184 isolates from a strain collection were tested by an in-house rifaximin disc (40 µg) diffusion test, by an in-house rifaximin broth microdilution test, by rifampicin Etest and by rpoB gene sequencing. In the absence of respective CLSI or EUCAST MIC breakpoints for rifaximin and rifampicin against C. difficile we chose MIC ≥32 µg ml(-1) as criterion for reduced in vitro susceptibility. To further validate the disc diffusion test 898 consecutive clinical isolates were analysed using the disc diffusion test, the Etest and rpoB gene sequence analysis for all resistant strains. Rifaximin broth microdilution tests of the 184 reference strains yielded rifaximin MICs ranging from 0.001 (n = 1) to ≥1024 µg ml(-1) (n = 61); 62 isolates showed a reduced susceptibility (MIC ≥32 µg ml(-1)). All of these 62 strains showed rpoB gene mutations producing amino acid substitutions; the rifampicin- and rifaximin-susceptible strains showed either a wild-type sequence or silent amino acid substitutions (19 strains). For 11 arbitrarily chosen isolates with rifaximin MICs of >1024 µg ml(-1), rifaximin end-point MICs were determined by broth dilution: 4096 µg ml(-1) (n = 2), 8192 µg ml(-1) (n = 6), 16,384 µg ml(-1) (n = 2) and 32,678 µg ml(-1) (n = 1). Rifampicin Etests on the 184 C. difficile reference strains yielded MICs ranging from ≤0.002 (n = 117) to ≥32 µg ml(-1) (n = 59). Using a 38 mm inhibition zone as breakpoint for reduced susceptibility the use of rifaximin disc diffusion yielded 59 results correlating with those obtained by use of rifaximin broth microdilution in 98.4 % of the 184 strains tested. Rifampicin Etests performed on the 898 clinical isolates revealed that 67 isolates had MICs of ≥32 µg ml(-1). There were no discordant results observed among these isolates with reduced susceptibility using an MIC of ≥32 µg ml(-1) as breakpoint for reduced rifampicin susceptibility and a <38 mm inhibition zone as breakpoint for reduced rifaximin susceptibility. The prevalence of reduced susceptibility was 7.5 % for all isolates tested. However, for PCR ribotype 027 the prevalence of reduced susceptibility was 26 %. Susceptibility testing in the microbiology laboratory therefore could have an impact on the care and outcome of patients with infection. Our results show that rifaximin--despite its water-insolubility--may be a suitable candidate for disc diffusion testing.