Dataset Information

Comparison of bottom-up proteomic approaches for LC-MS analysis of complex proteomes.

ABSTRACT: Discovery-based proteomic studies aim to answer important biological questions by identifying as many proteins as possible. In order to accomplish this lofty goal, an effort must be placed on determining an optimal workflow that maximizes protein identifications. In this study, we compare protein extraction, digestion and fractionation methods for bottom-up proteomics using a human colon cancer cell line as our model system. Four different buffers for protein extraction, two digestion approaches, as well as three sample fractionation methods were evaluated in order to determine an accessible workflow that gives maximal protein identifications. Samples comparing these workflows were analyzed via UPLC paired with tandem MS on a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer. Our goal is to determine an optimal workflow to enable users to maximize protein identifications. Our results show that an increased number of confident protein identifications are attained with a filter-aided digestion approach as compared to an in-solution digestion. Overall SDS-PAGE fractionation leads to higher numbers of identifications than SCX SpinTip and reverse phased cartridge platforms. The novel aspect of this work is the comparison of two readily available, offline platforms for fractionation in reference to a traditional technique, SDS-PAGE.

SUBMITTER: Weston LA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3839868 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of bottom-up proteomic approaches for LC-MS analysis of complex proteomes.

Weston Leigh A LA Bauer Kerry M KM Hummon Amanda B AB

Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications 20130901 18

Discovery-based proteomic studies aim to answer important biological questions by identifying as many proteins as possible. In order to accomplish this lofty goal, an effort must be placed on determining an optimal workflow that maximizes protein identifications. In this study, we compare protein extraction, digestion and fractionation methods for bottom-up proteomics using a human colon cancer cell line as our model system. Four different buffers for protein extraction, two digestion approaches ...[more]

PMID: 24288579

Similar Datasets

Project description:Comparability studies lie at the heart of assessments that evaluate differences amongst manufacturing processes and stability studies of protein therapeutics. Low resolution chromatographic and electrophoretic methods facilitate quantitation, but do not always yield detailed insight into the effect of the manufacturing change or environmental stress. Conversely, mass spectrometry (MS) can provide high resolution information on the molecule, but conventional methods are not very quantitative. This gap can be reconciled by use of a stable isotope-tagged reference standard (SITRS), a version of the analyte protein that is uniformly labeled (13)C6-arginine and (13)C6-lysine. The SITRS serves as an internal control that is trypsin-digested and analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC)-MS with the analyte sample. The ratio of the ion intensities of each unlabeled and labeled peptide pair is then compared to that of other sample(s). A comparison of these ratios provides a readily accessible way to spot even minute differences among samples. In a study of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) spiked with varying amounts of the same antibody bearing point mutations, peptides containing the mutations were readily identified and quantified at concentrations as low as 2% relative to unmodified peptides. The method is robust, reproducible and produced a linear response for every peptide that was monitored. The method was also successfully used to distinguish between two batches of a mAb that were produced in two different cell lines while two batches produced from the same cell line were found to be highly comparable. Finally, the use of the SITRS method in the comparison of two stressed mAb samples enabled the identification of sites susceptible to deamidation and oxidation, as well as their quantitation. The experimental results indicate that use of a SITRS in a peptide mapping experiment with MS detection enables sensitive and quantitative comparability studies of proteins at high resolution.

Dataset Information

Comparison of bottom-up proteomic approaches for LC-MS analysis of complex proteomes.

Publications

Comparison of bottom-up proteomic approaches for LC-MS analysis of complex proteomes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets