Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To test the efficacy of Counselor-Assisted Problem Solving (CAPS) versus an Internet resource comparison (IRC) condition in reducing behavior problems in adolescents following traumatic brain injury (TBI).Design
Randomized clinical trial with interviewers naive to treatment condition.Setting
Three large tertiary children's hospitals and 2 general hospitals with pediatric commitment.Participants
A total of 132 children and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years hospitalized during the previous 6 months for moderate to severe TBI.Interventions
Participants in CAPS (n = 65) completed 8 to 12 online modules providing training in problem solving, communication skills, and self-regulation and subsequent synchronous videoconferencing with a therapist. Participants in the IRC group (n = 67) received links to Internet resources about pediatric TBI.Main outcome measures
Child Behavior Checklist administered before and after completion of treatment (ie, approximately 6 months after treatment initiation).Results
Post hoc analysis of covariance, controlling for pretreatment scores, was used to examine group differences in behavior problems in the entire sample and among older (n = 59) and younger adolescents (n = 53). Among older but not younger adolescents, CAPS resulted in greater improvements on multiple dimensions of externalizing behavior problems than IRC.Conclusion
Online problem-solving therapy may be effective in reducing behavior problems in older adolescent survivors of moderate-severe TBI.
SUBMITTER: Wade SL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3840164 | biostudies-literature | 2014 May-Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Wade Shari L SL Stancin Terry T Kirkwood Michael M Brown Tanya Maines TM McMullen Kendra M KM Taylor H Gerry HG
The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation 20140501 3
<h4>Objective</h4>To test the efficacy of Counselor-Assisted Problem Solving (CAPS) versus an Internet resource comparison (IRC) condition in reducing behavior problems in adolescents following traumatic brain injury (TBI).<h4>Design</h4>Randomized clinical trial with interviewers naive to treatment condition.<h4>Setting</h4>Three large tertiary children's hospitals and 2 general hospitals with pediatric commitment.<h4>Participants</h4>A total of 132 children and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years ...[more]