Dataset Information

Is "appearing chronically ill" a sign of poor health? A study of diagnostic accuracy.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a physician's assessment that a patient "appears chronically ill" for the detection of poor health status.

Methods

The health status of 126 adult outpatients was determined using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Physician participants (n?=?111 residents and faculty) viewed photographs of each patient participant and assessed whether or not the patient appeared chronically ill. For the entire group of physicians, the median sensitivity and specificity of "appearing chronically ill" for the detection of poor health status (defined as SF-12 physical health score below age group norms by at least 1 SD) were calculated. The study took place from February 2009 to January 2011.

Results

Forty-two participants (33%) had an SF-12 physical health score ?1 SD below age group norms, and 22 (18%) had a score ?2 SD below age group norms. When poor health status was defined as an SF-12 physical score ?1 SD below age group norms, the median sensitivity was 38.1% (IQR 28.6-47.6%), specificity 78.6% (IQR 69.0-84.0%), positive likelihood ratio 1.64 (IQR 1.42-2.15), and negative likelihood ratio 0.82 (IQR 0.74-0.87). For an SF-12 physical score ?2 SD below age group norms, the median sensitivity was 45.5% (IQR 36.4-54.5%), specificity 76.9% (IQR 66.3-83.7%), positive likelihood ratio 1.77 (IQR 1.49-2.25), and negative likelihood ratio 0.75 (IQR 0.66-0.86).

Conclusions

Our study suggests that a physician's assessment that a patient "appears chronically ill" has poor sensitivity and modest specificity for the detection of poor health status in adult outpatients. The associated likelihood ratios indicate that this assessment may have limited diagnostic value.

SUBMITTER: Rawal S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3842283 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Is "appearing chronically ill" a sign of poor health? A study of diagnostic accuracy.

Rawal Shail S Atia Mina M Nisenbaum Rosane R Paré Dwayne E DE Joorden Steve S Hwang Stephen W SW

PloS one 20131127 11

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a physician's assessment that a patient "appears chronically ill" for the detection of poor health status.<h4>Methods</h4>The health status of 126 adult outpatients was determined using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Physician participants (n = 111 residents and faculty) viewed photographs of each patient participant and assessed whether or not the patient appeared chronically ill. For the entire group of physicians ...[more]

PMID: 24312192

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimTo assess the accuracy of self-reported gingival bleeding on brushing (GBoB) for differentiating between periodontal health and disease and explore the optimal haemoglobin concentration that enables visual detection of GBoB.Materials and methodsSelf-assessment of GBoB was conducted in supervised sessions for 408 consecutive adults. The haemoglobin levels in saliva/toothpaste slurry (TPS) were analysed, followed by a full-mouth periodontal examination. Periodontal diagnoses were made based on the 2017 classification of periodontal diseases. Gingival inflammation was defined as presence of at least 10% of sites with bleeding on probing (BOP). Logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses were applied to assess the accuracy of GBoB.ResultsOverall, 37.1% of the subjects claimed self-reported GBoB, and they had higher values of BOP (median: 25.0%; interquartile range (IQR): 16.0%-37.5%) than those without GBoB (median: 13.5%; IQR: 8.0%-24.8%, p < .001). The concentration/total amount of haemoglobin in TPS was positively correlated with the number of bleeding sites (r = .409/r = .520, p < .001). Haemoglobin concentration of 90.58 μg/ml or 0.51 μl blood volume enabled visual detection of GBoB with an AUROC of 0.848. Self-reported GBoB exhibited significantly increased values of diagnostic odds ratios (3-8) for varying degrees of gingival inflammation and periodontal disease (gingivitis and periodontitis). It showed low to moderate accuracy for discriminating periodontitis and gingivitis from periodontal health, with a sensitivity of 37.1% and 61.3% and a specificity of 84.8% and 84.4%, respectively. Absence of self-reported GBoB and low levels of haemoglobin had 93%-98% predictive values for periodontal health.ConclusionsDespite its low sensitivity for the discrimination of periodontitis, self-reported GBoB is a promising sentinel sign for periodontal health and disease, and gingival inflammation in particular. It is visually detectable after minor blood loss. After validation in an independent population, identification of GBoB may promote earlier detection and better prevention and treatment of periodontal disease, thereby eventually reducing the global burden of the disease.

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of the World Health Organization (WHO) partograph alert line and other candidate predictors in the identification of women at risk of developing severe adverse birth outcomes.DesignA facility-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study.SettingThirteen maternity hospitals located in Nigeria and Uganda.PopulationA total of 9995 women with spontaneous onset of labour presenting at cervical dilatation of ≤6 cm or undergoing induction of labour.MethodsResearch assistants collected data on sociodemographic, anthropometric, obstetric, and medical characteristics of study participants at hospital admission, multiple assessments during labour, and interventions during labour and childbirth. The alert line and action line, intrapartum monitoring parameters, and customised labour curves were assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and the J statistic.OutcomesSevere adverse birth outcomes.ResultsThe rate of severe adverse birth outcomes was 2.2% (223 women with severe adverse birth outcomes), the rate of augmentation of labour was 35.1% (3506 women), and the caesarean section rate was 13.2% (1323 women). Forty-nine percent of women in labour crossed the alert line (4163/8489). All reference labour curves had a diagnostic odds ratio ranging from 1.29 to 1.60. The J statistic was less than 10% for all reference curves.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that labour is an extremely variable phenomenon, and the assessment of cervical dilatation over time is a poor predictor of severe adverse birth outcomes. The validity of a partograph alert line based on the 'one-centimetre per hour' rule should be re-evaluated.FundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), and WHO (A65879).Tweetable abstractThe alert line in check: results from a WHO study.

Dataset Information

Is "appearing chronically ill" a sign of poor health? A study of diagnostic accuracy.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Is "appearing chronically ill" a sign of poor health? A study of diagnostic accuracy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets