Dataset Information

Genome-wide comparative analysis of phylogenetic trees: the prokaryotic forest of life.

ABSTRACT: Genome-wide comparison of phylogenetic trees is becoming an increasingly common approach in evolutionary genomics, and a variety of approaches for such comparison have been developed. In this article, we present several methods for comparative analysis of large numbers of phylogenetic trees. To compare phylogenetic trees taking into account the bootstrap support for each internal branch, the Boot-Split Distance (BSD) method is introduced as an extension of the previously developed Split Distance method for tree comparison. The BSD method implements the straightforward idea that comparison of phylogenetic trees can be made more robust by treating tree splits differentially depending on the bootstrap support. Approaches are also introduced for detecting tree-like and net-like evolutionary trends in the phylogenetic Forest of Life (FOL), i.e., the entirety of the phylogenetic trees for conserved genes of prokaryotes. The principal method employed for this purpose includes mapping quartets of species onto trees to calculate the support of each quartet topology and so to quantify the tree and net contributions to the distances between species. We describe the application of these methods to analyze the FOL and the results obtained with these methods. These results support the concept of the Tree of Life (TOL) as a central evolutionary trend in the FOL as opposed to the traditional view of the TOL as a "species tree."

SUBMITTER: Puigbo P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3842619 | biostudies-literature | 2012

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genome-wide comparative analysis of phylogenetic trees: the prokaryotic forest of life.

Puigbò Pere P Wolf Yuri I YI Koonin Eugene V EV

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 20120101

Genome-wide comparison of phylogenetic trees is becoming an increasingly common approach in evolutionary genomics, and a variety of approaches for such comparison have been developed. In this article, we present several methods for comparative analysis of large numbers of phylogenetic trees. To compare phylogenetic trees taking into account the bootstrap support for each internal branch, the Boot-Split Distance (BSD) method is introduced as an extension of the previously developed Split Distance ...[more]

PMID: 22399455

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn the pursuit of a better understanding of biodiversity, evolutionary biologists rely on the study of phylogenetic relationships to illustrate the course of evolution. The relationships among natural organisms, depicted in the shape of phylogenetic trees, not only help to understand evolutionary history but also have a wide range of additional applications in science. One of the most challenging problems that arise when building phylogenetic trees is the presence of missing biological data. More specifically, the possibility of inferring wrong phylogenetic trees increases proportionally to the amount of missing values in the input data. Although there are methods proposed to deal with this issue, their applicability and accuracy is often restricted by different constraints.ResultsWe propose a framework, called PhyloMissForest, to impute missing entries in phylogenetic distance matrices and infer accurate evolutionary relationships. PhyloMissForest is built upon a random forest structure that infers the missing entries of the input data, based on the known parts of it. PhyloMissForest contributes with a robust and configurable framework that incorporates multiple search strategies and machine learning, complemented by phylogenetic techniques, to provide a more accurate inference of lost phylogenetic distances. We evaluate our framework by examining three real-world datasets, two DNA-based sequence alignments and one containing amino acid data, and two additional instances with simulated DNA data. Moreover, we follow a design of experiments methodology to define the hyperparameter values of our algorithm, which is a concise method, preferable in comparison to the well-known exhaustive parameters search. By varying the percentages of missing data from 5% to 60%, we generally outperform the state-of-the-art alternative imputation techniques in the tests conducted on real DNA data. In addition, significant improvements in execution time are observed for the amino acid instance. The results observed on simulated data also denote the attainment of improved imputations when dealing with large percentages of missing data.ConclusionsBy merging multiple search strategies, machine learning, and phylogenetic techniques, PhyloMissForest provides a highly customizable and robust framework for phylogenetic missing data imputation, with significant topological accuracy and effective speedups over the state of the art.

Dataset Information

Genome-wide comparative analysis of phylogenetic trees: the prokaryotic forest of life.

Publications

Genome-wide comparative analysis of phylogenetic trees: the prokaryotic forest of life.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets