Dataset Information

The association of socioeconomic status and access to low-volume service providers in breast cancer.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: No large-scale study has explored the combined effect of patients' individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) on their access to a low-volume provider for breast cancer surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore under a nationwide universal health insurance system whether breast cancer patients from a lower individual and neighborhood SES are disproportionately receiving breast cancer surgery from low-volume providers. METHODS: 5,750 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery in 2006 were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the access to a low-volume provider between the different individual and neighborhood SES groups after adjusting for possible confounding and risk factors. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was used to determine how well the model fit the data. RESULTS: Univariate analysis data shows that patients in disadvantaged neighborhood were more likely to receive breast cancer surgery at low-volume hospitals; and lower-SES patients were more likely to receive surgery from low-volume surgeons. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for patient characteristics, the odds ratios of moderate- and low-SES patients in disadvantaged neighborhood receiving surgery at low-volume hospitals was 1.47 (95% confidence interval=1.19-1.81) and 1.31 (95% confidence interval=1.05-1.64) respectively compared with high-SES patients in advantaged neighborhood. Moderate- and low-SES patients from either advantaged or disadvantaged neighborhood had an odds ratios ranging from 1.51 to 1.80 (p<0.001) to receiving surgery from low-volume surgeons. In Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, p>0.05 that shows the model has a good fit. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cross-sectional study, even under a nationwide universal health insurance system, disparities in access to healthcare existed. Breast cancer patients from a lower individual and neighborhood SES are more likely to receive breast cancer surgery from low-volume providers. The authorities and public health policies should keep focusing on these vulnerable groups.

SUBMITTER: Chang CM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3846901 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The association of socioeconomic status and access to low-volume service providers in breast cancer.

Chang Chun-Ming CM Yin Wen-Yao WY Wei Chang-Kuo CK Lin Chun-Hung CH Huang Kuang-Yung KY Lin Shih-Pin SP Lee Cheng-Hung CH Chou Pesus P Lee Ching-Chih CC

PloS one 20131202 12

<h4>Background</h4>No large-scale study has explored the combined effect of patients' individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) on their access to a low-volume provider for breast cancer surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore under a nationwide universal health insurance system whether breast cancer patients from a lower individual and neighborhood SES are disproportionately receiving breast cancer surgery from low-volume providers.<h4>Methods</h4>5,750 patients who under ...[more]

PMID: 24312589

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceLong-term disability after stroke is associated with socioeconomic status (SES). However, the reasons for such disparities in outcomes remain unclear.ObjectiveTo assess whether lower SES is associated with larger admission infarct volume and whether initial infarct volume accounts for the association between SES and long-term disability.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study was conducted in a prospective, consecutive population (n = 1256) presenting with acute ischemic stroke who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 24 hours of admission. Patients were recruited in Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, from May 31, 2009, to December 31, 2011. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2019, until June 30, 2020.Main outcomes and measuresInitial stroke severity (within 24 hours of presentation) was determined using clinical (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]) and imaging (infarct volume by diffusion-weighted MRI) measures. Stroke etiologic subtypes were determined using the Causative Classification of Ischemic Stroke algorithm. Long-term stroke disability was measured using the modified Rankin Scale. Socioeconomic status was estimated using zip code-derived median household income and census block group-derived area deprivation index (ADI). Regression and mediation analyses were performed.ResultsA total of 1098 patients had imaging and SES data available (mean [SD] age, 68.1 [15.7] years; 607 men [55.3%]). Income was inversely associated with initial infarct volume (standardized β, -0.074 [95% CI, -0.127 to -0.020]; P = .007), initial NIHSS (standardized β, -0.113 [95% CI, -0.171 to -0.054]; P < .001), and long-term disability (standardized β, -0.092 [95% CI, -0.149 to -0.035]; P = .001), which remained significant after multivariable adjustments. Initial stroke severity accounted for 64% of the association between SES and long-term disability (standardized β, -0.063 [95% CI, -0.095 to -0.029]; P < .05). Findings were similar when SES was alternatively assessed using ADI.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this cohort study suggest that lower SES is associated with larger infarct volumes on presentation. These SES-associated differences in initial stroke severity accounted for most of the subsequent disparities in long-term disability in this study. These findings shift the culpability for SES-associated disparities in poststroke disability from poststroke factors to those that precede presentation.

Project description:ImportanceIndividuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) bear a disproportionate share of the coronary heart disease (CHD) burden, and CHD remains the leading cause of mortality in low-income US counties.ObjectiveTo estimate the excess CHD burden among individuals in the United States with low SES and the proportions attributable to traditional risk factors and to other factors associated with low SES.Design, setting, and participantsThis computer simulation study used the Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model, a model of CHD and stroke incidence, prevalence, and mortality among adults in the United States, to project the excess burden of early CHD. The proportion of this excess burden attributable to traditional CHD risk factors (smoking, high blood pressure, high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, type 2 diabetes, and high body mass index) compared with the proportion attributable to other risk factors associated with low SES was estimated. Model inputs were derived from nationally representative US data and cohort studies of incident CHD. All US adults aged 35 to 64 years, stratified by SES, were included in the simulations.ExposuresLow SES was defined as income below 150% of the federal poverty level or educational level less than a high school diploma.Main outcomes and measuresPremature (before age 65 years) myocardial infarction (MI) rates and CHD deaths.ResultsApproximately 31.2 million US adults aged 35 to 64 years had low SES, of whom approximately 16 million (51.3%) were women. Compared with individuals with higher SES, both men and women in the low-SES group had double the rate of MIs (men: 34.8 [95% uncertainty interval (UI), 31.0-38.8] vs 17.6 [95% UI, 16.0-18.6]; women: 15.1 [95% UI, 13.4-16.9] vs 6.8 [95% UI, 6.3-7.4]) and CHD deaths (men: 14.3 [95% UI, 13.0-15.7] vs 7.6 [95% UI, 7.3-7.9]; women: 5.6 [95% UI, 5.0-6.2] vs 2.5 [95% UI, 2.3-2.6]) per 10 000 person-years. A higher burden of traditional CHD risk factors in adults with low SES explained 40% of these excess events; the remaining 60% of these events were attributable to other factors associated with low SES. Among a simulated cohort of 1.3 million adults with low SES who were 35 years old in 2015, the model projected that 250 000 individuals (19%) will develop CHD by age 65 years, with 119 000 (48%) of these CHD cases occurring in excess of those expected for individuals with higher SES.Conclusions and relevanceThis study suggested that, for approximately one-quarter of US adults aged 35 to 64 years, low SES was substantially associated with early CHD burden. Although biomedical interventions to modify traditional risk factors may decrease the disease burden, disparities by SES may remain without addressing SES itself.

Project description:ImportanceDigital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has reduced recall and increased cancer detection compared with digital mammography (DM), depending on women's age and breast density. Whether DBT screening access and use are equitable across groups of women based on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic characteristics is uncertain.ObjectiveTo determine women's access to and use of DBT screening based on race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and income.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study included 92 geographically diverse imaging facilities across 5 US states, at which a total of 2 313 118 screening examinations were performed among women aged 40 to 89 years from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017. Data were analyzed from June 13, 2019, to August 18, 2020.ExposuresWomen's race/ethnicity, educational level, and community-level household income.Main outcomes and measuresAccess to DBT (on-site access) at time of screening by examination year and actual use of DBT vs DM screening by years since facility-level DBT adoption (≤5 years).ResultsAmong the 2 313 118 screening examinations included in the analysis, the proportion of women who had DBT access at the time of their screening appointment increased from 11 558 of 354 107 (3.3%) in 2011 to 194 842 of 235 972 (82.6%) in 2017. In 2012, compared with White women, Black (relative risk [RR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.03-0.11), Asian American (RR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.75), and Hispanic (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.80) women had significantly less DBT access, and women with less than a high school education had lower DBT access compared with college graduates (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.10-0.32). Among women attending facilities with both DM and DBT available at the time of screening, Black women experienced lower DBT use compared with White women attending the same facility (RRs, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.82-0.85] to 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]); women with lower educational level experienced lower DBT use (RRs, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.74-0.84] to 0.88 [95% CI, 0.85-0.91] for non-high school graduates and 0.90 [95% CI, 0.89-0.92] to 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99] for high school graduates vs college graduates); and women within the lowest income quartile experienced lower DBT use vs women in the highest income quartile (RRs, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.87-0.91] to 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-1.00]) regardless of the number of years after facility-level DBT adoption.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cross-sectional study, women of minority race/ethnicity and lower socioeconomic status experienced lower DBT access during the early adoption period and persistently lower DBT use when available over time. Future efforts should address racial/ethnic, educational, and financial barriers to DBT screening.

Dataset Information

The association of socioeconomic status and access to low-volume service providers in breast cancer.

Publications

The association of socioeconomic status and access to low-volume service providers in breast cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets