Dataset Information

Addicts with chronic hepatitis C: difficult to reach, manage or treat?

ABSTRACT: To assess the acceptance, safety and efficacy of care and treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in drug addicts.We designed a multidisciplinary, phase IV prospective cohort study. All illicit drug users (IDUs) visited a Territorial Addiction Service (SerT) in the District of Brescia, and hepatitis C antibody (HCVAb) testing positive were offered as part of a standardised hepatologic visit in our Gastroenterology Unit. Patients with confirmed CHC and without medical contraindications were administered peginterferon alfa-2b 1.5 ?g/kg per week plus ribavirin (800-1400 mg/d) for 16-48 wk. All IDUs were unselected because of ongoing addiction and read and signed an informed consent form. Virologic responses at weeks 4 and 12 of therapy, at the end of treatment and 24 wk after the end of treatment were the main measures of efficacy. Adherence was estimated according to the 80/80/80 criteria.From November 2007 to December 2009, 162 HCVAb+ IDUs were identified. Sixty-seven patients (41% of the initial cohort) completed the diagnostic procedure, and CHC was diagnosed in 54 (33% of the total). Forty-nine patients were offered therapy, and 39 agreed (80% of acceptance rate). The prevalent HCV genotype was type 1, and the HCV RNA baseline level was over 5.6 log/mL in 61% of cases. Five patients dropped out, two because of severe adverse events (SAEs) and three without medical need. Twenty-three and 14 patients achieved end of treatment responses (ETRs; 59%) and sustained virologic responses (SVRs; 36%), respectively. Thirty-one patients were fully compliant with the study protocol (80% adherence). The prevalence of host and viral characteristics negatively affecting the treatment response was high: age over 40 years (54%), male gender (85%), overweight body type (36%), previous unsuccessful antiviral therapy (21%), HCV genotype and viral load (60% and 62%, respectively), earlier contact with HBV (40%) and steatosis and fibrosis (44% and 17%, respectively). In a univariate analysis, alcohol intake was associated with a non-response (P = 0.0018, 95%CI: 0.0058-0.4565).Drug addicts with CHC can be successfully treated in a multidisciplinary setting using standard antiviral combination therapy, despite several "difficult to reach, manage and treat" characteristics.

SUBMITTER: Zanini B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3848148 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Addicts with chronic hepatitis C: difficult to reach, manage or treat?

Zanini Barbara B Benini Federica F Pigozzi Marie Graciella MG Furba Patrizia P Giacò Ernesto E Cinquegrana Antonia A Fasoli Mariagrazia M Lanzini Alberto A

World journal of gastroenterology 20131101 44

<h4>Aim</h4>To assess the acceptance, safety and efficacy of care and treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in drug addicts.<h4>Methods</h4>We designed a multidisciplinary, phase IV prospective cohort study. All illicit drug users (IDUs) visited a Territorial Addiction Service (SerT) in the District of Brescia, and hepatitis C antibody (HCVAb) testing positive were offered as part of a standardised hepatologic visit in our Gastroenterology Unit. Patients with confirmed CHC and without medical ...[more]

PMID: 24307794

Similar Datasets

Project description:Treatment options remain limited for patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), while there are still concerns over the consequences of long-term corticosteroid use. A few studies have suggested a role for B cell-driven autoimmune liver injury in AIH. This multicentre, international retrospective cohort study from the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of rituximab in difficult-to-manage AIH.MethodsClinical data from 22 patients who received rituximab between 2007 and 2017 were collected from centres in the United Kingdom, Germany and Canada. Clinical response was assessed using changes in biochemical and immunological parameters up to 24 months post-rituximab infusion. In addition, we compared the doses of prednisolone used 3 months before and 12 months after treatment, and assessed freedom from AIH flares over the post-treatment period.ResultsTwenty-two patients with type-1 AIH were included, with a median age of 40 years at diagnosis (range 19-79); 15/22 (68%) were female and 18/22 (82%) were Caucasian. The median period from diagnosis to the end of follow-up in these patients was 11 years (range 3-28). Values of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and albumin improved significantly following rituximab therapy, and were sustained for up to 2 years (all p ≪0.001). Prednisolone doses were significantly reduced by 12 months post-treatment (p = 0.003), with 13/21 (62%) patients having a dose reduction. Over a median post-treatment follow-up period of 6 years (range 1-10), 5 patients developed AIH flares at a median of 22 months post-treatment, giving an estimated 71% freedom from AIH flare at 2 years. Four of these patients received a second course of treatment, of whom 2 had subsequent further flares. No serious adverse events attributable to rituximab were recorded.ConclusionIn patients with difficult-to-manage AIH, rituximab appears to be clinically effective and well tolerated. Rituximab was associated with sustained improvements in serum liver tests, an absence of clinical disease flares, and a reduction in prednisolone dose. Controlled trials are warranted to further evaluate B cell-targeting therapies in patients with AIH.Lay summaryAutoimmune hepatitis is an autoimmune condition of the liver, usually treated with medications that suppress the immune system, such as steroids. However, some patients do not respond to this treatment. We analysed the safety and efficacy of rituximab in patients who were not responding to first- or second-line therapies. Rituximab was safe and improved liver blood tests in 70% of patients over a 2-year follow-up period, while enabling steroid doses to be reduced in two-thirds of patients, which is a very positive clinical outcome.

Project description:BackgroundSome reports have documented the coexistence of Hepatitis B surfage Antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HBsAg antibodies (HBsAb) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), often in the absence of amino acid substitutions in the HBsAg sequences of the Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) genome able to explain an immunological escape variant.HBV genome has a very compact coding organization, with four partially overlapping open reading frames (ORFs). Because the reverse transcriptase region (rt) of HBV polymerase overlaps the HBsAg ORF, it is possible that some mutations in the HBsAg region correspond to mutations in the rt ORF, conferring resistance to current antiviral therapies. This unique case explores the response to antiviral therapies of a CHB with concurrent HBsAg and HBsAb positivity, and analyse the clinical implications of possible mutations in rt and HBsAg ORFs.Case presentationHere we describe the case of a 59 year-old Italian man suffering from Hepatitis B envelope Antigen (HBeAg) positive CHB with concurrent HBsAb positivity. By ultra-deep pyro-sequencing (UDPS) technique, mutations conferring immunological escape or resistance to antiviral therapies were found neither in HBsAg nor in HBV rt ORFs, respectively. The patient was unsuccessfully treated with interferon, adefovir monotherapy and adefovir plus entecavir combination. Surprisingly, during entecavir plus tenofovir combination, anti-HBe seroconversion and HBsAg loss were observed, while the titer of HBsAb persisted.ConclusionsConcurrent HBsAg/HBsAb positivity in active CHB is a clinical and virological dilemma. In this setting, there are not consistent data about the response to conventional therapies and the immunological balance between host and virus remains so far unexplained. This is, to our knowledge, the first case described of a CHB with HBsAg/HBsAb positivity, wild type for clinically relevant mutations in HBsAg and rt ORFs, successfully treated with a combination of nucleot(s)ide analogues (NAs).

Project description:ObjectiveRecently, several academics have recommended that the concept of difficult-to-treat depression (DTD) should be considered in some of the cases where achieving or maintaining remission of depressive symptoms is not possible. In 2020, a consensus statement, not based on a formal process and systematic review defined difficult-to-treat depression as "depression that continues to cause significant burden despite normal treatment efforts". In addition to addressing symptom control, interventions for DTD should also target other factors, including the management of psychiatric and medical comorbidities, psychosocial functioning, self-esteem, and self-management strategies. The purpose of this scoping review is to explore the scientific literature, which is still unclear and vague, regarding the pathophysiology and treatment of difficult-to-treat depression, providing a summary of its current conceptualization. This represents a cultural and scientific shift that offers clinicians and researchers valid and up-to-date study criteria, thus expanding upon the model of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Consequently contributions, concepts, theories and gaps of the state of the art in the description of difficult-to-treat depression have been summarized here.MethodA research study was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Open Grey databases to identify and examine articles reporting key features related to the recent concept of difficult-to-treat depression. The research covered a period of time between January 1, 2013, and March 1, 2023. Based on a formal checklist, two researchers independently assessed the eligibility criteria to determine which studies to include or exclude in this search. Further data evaluations were conducted for the articles that were deemed to have the most comprehensive descriptions.ResultsThe results of the research yielded a body of literature that provides a clear definition of difficult-to-treat depression and insights into its clinical application and research perspective.ConclusionsDTD represents a cultural and scientific shift that provides clinicians and researchers with valid and up-to-date study criteria that allow the extension of the treatment-resistant depression (TRD) model. The main difference lies in the operational process of assessment and intervention in the depressive syndrome in relation to the search for a therapeutic response. The results of this review show that DTD is a theoretically and clinically useful conceptualization for depressive syndromes that are not just simply resistant to treatment. This clinical condition entails a novel clinical therapeutic approach for specific patients and may be used throughout the world to help recognize this clinical condition while optimizing overall care for these patients. However, as we have highlighted, in the absence of RCTs and further observational studies, it is desirable that DTD be further investigated and defined..

Dataset Information

Addicts with chronic hepatitis C: difficult to reach, manage or treat?

Publications

Addicts with chronic hepatitis C: difficult to reach, manage or treat?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets