Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Understanding treatment decision making in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a qualitative assessment.


ABSTRACT:

Background

The increase in therapeutic options for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has added complexity to treatment decisions. Shared decision making has the potential to help providers and families work together to choose the best possible option for each patient from the array of choices. As part of a needs assessment, prior to design and implementation of shared decision making interventions, we conducted a qualitative assessment of clinicians' current approaches to treatment decision making in JIA.

Methods

Pediatric rheumatology clinicians were recruited from 2 academic children's hospitals affiliated with a quality improvement learning network, using purposive and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews elicited how clinicians with prescribing authority (n?=?10) interact with families to make treatment decisions. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A multi-disciplinary research team used content analysis to analyze the interview data.To validate data from individual interviews and enrich our understanding, we presented the interview results to pediatric rheumatology clinicians attending a learning network meeting (n?=?24 from 12 children's hospitals). We then asked the clinicians questions to further identify and discuss areas of variation in the decision-making processes.

Results

Clinicians described a decision-making process in which they, rather than the family or other care team members, consistently initiated treatment decisions. Initial treatment options presented to families generally reflected the clinician's preferred treatment approaches, which differed across clinicians. Clinicians used various methods to inform families about treatment options and tailor information according to perceptions of a family's information needs, level of comprehension or mood (e.g. anxiety). The attributes of medication presented to families fell into 4 categories: benefits, risks, logistics and family preferences. Clinicians typically included family members in the decision to initiate JIA treatment after limiting the options to fit the clinical situation and the clinician's own preferences. Family members' preferences were seen as more integral in the decision to stop treatment after symptom remission.

Conclusions

Decision making about initial JIA treatment appears to be largely driven by clinician preferences. Family preferences are more likely to be considered for treatment discontinuation. Opportunities exist to develop, test, and implement tools to facilitate shared decision making in pediatric rheumatology.

SUBMITTER: Lipstein EA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3849714 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Understanding treatment decision making in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a qualitative assessment.

Lipstein Ellen A EA   Brinkman William B WB   Sage Jessica J   Lannon Carole M CM   Morgan Dewitt Esi E  

Pediatric rheumatology online journal 20130930 1


<h4>Background</h4>The increase in therapeutic options for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has added complexity to treatment decisions. Shared decision making has the potential to help providers and families work together to choose the best possible option for each patient from the array of choices. As part of a needs assessment, prior to design and implementation of shared decision making interventions, we conducted a qualitative assessment of clinicians' current approaches to treatment dec  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3729726 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4521899 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC10571000 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5477111 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5482342 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4848803 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3368104 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3089768 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8393258 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9753416 | biostudies-literature