Comparison of TNM staging systems for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and proposal of a new staging system.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
There are few systematic evaluations regarding the sixth and seventh editions of the UICC/AJCC TNM Staging System (TNM6th, TNM7th) and Chinese 2008 Staging System (TNMc2008) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Methods
We classified 2333 patients into intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) cohort (n=941) and conventional radiotherapy (CRT) cohort (n=1392). Tumour staging defined by TNM6th, TNM7th and TNMc2008 was compared based on Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's concordance index (c-index).Results
For T-classification, TNM6th (AIC=2585.367; c-index=0.6390385) had superior prognostic value to TNM7th (AIC=2593.242; c-index=0.6226889) and TNMc2008 (AIC=2593.998; c-index=0.6237146) in the IMRT cohort, whereas TNMc2008 was superior (AIC=5999.054; c-index=0.623547) in the CRT cohort. For N-classification, TNMc2008 had the highest prognostic value in both cohorts (AIC=2577.726, c-index=0.6297874; AIC=5956.339, c-index=0.6533576). Similar results were obtained when patients were stratified by chemotherapy types, age and gender. Using staging models in the IMRT cohort, we failed to identify better stage migrations than TNM6th T-classification and TNMc2008 N-classification. We therefore proposed to combine these categories; resultantly, stage groups of the proposed staging system showed superior prognostic value over TNM6th, TNM7th and TNMc2008.Conclusion
TNM6th T-classification and TNMc2008 N-classification have superior prognostic value in the IMRT era. By combining them with slight modifications, TNM criteria can be unified and its prognostic value be improved.
SUBMITTER: OuYang PY
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3859943 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background:Previous studies have demonstrated that the tumor-stromal ratio (TSR) was an independent prognostic factor in several types of carcinomas. This study aimed at exploring the prognostic significance of the TSR in invasive breast cancer using immunohistochemistry (IHC)-stained tissue microarrays (TMAs) and integrating the TSR into the traditional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. Methods:The prepared 7 TMAs containing 240 patients with 480 invasive BC specimens were stained with cytokeratin (CK) by the IHC staining method. The ratio of tumor cells and stromal cells was visually assessed. TSR?>?1 and TSR???1 were categorized as the high TSR (low stroma) and low TSR (high stroma) groups, respectively, and the prognostic value of the TSR at 5-year disease-free survival (5-DFS) was analyzed. A new Ts-TNM (tumor stroma-tumor-node-metastasis) staging system was established and assessed. Results:IHC staining of CK could specifically label tumor cells with clear contrast, making it easy to manually assess TSR. High TSR (low stroma) and low TSR (high stroma) were observed in 52.5% (n?=?126) and 47.5 (n?=?114) of the cases, according to the division of value 1. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the low TSR group had a worse 5-DFS compared with patients in the high TSR group (P=0.022). Multivariable analysis indicated that the T stage (P=0.014), N status (P < 0.001), histological grade (P < 0.001), estrogen receptor status (P=0.015), and TSR (P=0.011) were independent prognostic factors of invasive BC patients. The new Ts-TNM staging system combining TSR, tumor staging, lymph node status, and metastasis staging was established. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that the ability of the Ts-TNM staging system to predict recurrence was not lower than that of the TNM staging system. Conclusions:This study confirms that the TSR is a prognostic indicator for invasive breast cancer. The Ts-TNM staging system containing stromal and tumor information may optimize risk stratification for invasive breast cancer.
| S-EPMC7191412 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We aim to evaluate the quantitative parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT (metabolic parameters) and MRI (morphologic parameters) for prognostication and risk stratification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). 200 (147 males, aged 50?±?13 years-old, mean?±?S.D.) newly diagnosed patients with NPC (TxNxM0) were prospectively recruited. Primary tumor and nodal lesions were identified and segmented for both morphologic (volume, VOL) and metabolic (SUV and MTV) quantification. Independent predictive factors for recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were morphologic nodal volume (VOL_N, p?<?0.001), TNM-stage (p?=?0.022), N-Stage (p?=?0.024) for RFS, and VOL_N (p?=?0.014) for OS. Using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis, three risk-layers were identified for RFS: Stage I/II with VOL_N?<?18cc (HR?=?1), stage III /IV with VOL_N?<?18cc (HR?=?2.93), VOL_N???18cc (HR?=?7.84) regardless of disease stage (p?<?0.001). For OS, two risk layers were identified: VOL_N?<?18cc (HR?=?1), VOL_N???18cc (HR?=?4.23) (p?=?0.001). The 18cc threshold for morphologic nodal volume was validated by an independent cohort (n?=?105). Based on the above risk-classification, 35 patients (17.5%) would have a higher risk than suggested by the TNM-staging system. Thus, morphologic nodal volume is an important factor in prognostication and risk stratification in NPC, and should be incorporated into the staging system, while PET parameters have no advantage for this purpose in our cohort.
| S-EPMC5583337 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The current AJCC staging system for gastric cancer (AJCC7) incorporated several major revisions to the previous edition. The T and N categories and the stage groups were newly defined, and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) was reclassified and staged according to the esophageal system. Studies to validate these changes showed inconsistent results. The International Gastric Cancer Association (IGCA) launched a project to support evidence-based revisions to the next edition of the AJCC staging system.Clinical and pathological data on patients who underwent curative gastrectomy at 59 institutions in 15 countries between 2000 and 2004 were retrospectively collected. Patients lost to follow-up within 5 years of surgery were excluded. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. The data were analyzed in total, and separately by region of treatment.Of 25,411 eligible cases, 84.8 % were submitted from 24 institutions of Japan and Korea, 6.4 % from other Asian countries, and 8.8 % from 29 Western institutions. The T and N categories of AJCC7 clearly stratified the patient survival. Patients with pN3a and pN3b showed distinct prognosis in all regions, and by introducing pN3a and pN3b into a cluster analysis, we established a new stage grouping with better stratification than AJCC7, especially among stage III subgroups. Survival of Siewert type 2 and 3 EGJ tumors was better stratified by this IGCA stage grouping than by either esophageal or gastric scheme of AJCC7.For the next revision of AJCC classification, we propose a new stage grouping based on a large, worldwide data collection.
| S-EPMC4992472 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system (AJCC 8th) has been launched with modifications in T staging. The University of Hong Kong liver cancer staging system (HKUSS) has been proven to better categorize hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) into different T stages. This study aimed to compare the two systems' predictive ability for HCC recurrence after primary surgical resection.MethodsPatients who had primary, curative resection for HCC between 1989 and 2017 were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier plot was used to estimate disease-free survival (DFS), and the log-rank test was used for survival comparison between subgroups. The two systems' prediction of recurrence was evaluated by the Cox regression model.ResultsTotally 1,815 patients were included. With AJCC 8th, the 5-year DFS was 58.9% for T1a, 52.3% for T1b, 30% for T2, 16.9% for T3, and 14.4% for T4. No survival difference was demonstrated between T1a and T1b (P=0.668) or between T3 and T4 (P=0.562). With HKUSS, the 5-year DFS was 57.7% for T1, 43.4% for T2, 28.9% for T3, and 15.7% for T4. The T staging in HKUSS showed significant survival differences (T1 vs. T2, T2 vs. T3, and T3 vs. T4; P<0.001). Using receiver operating characteristic curves to show the recurrence status in the two systems, HKUSS had the largest area under curve (AUC) (HKUSS: AUC =0.655, SE 0.014, P<0.001, 95% CI, 0.628-0.681; AJCC 8th: AUC =0.652, SE 0.013, P<0.001, 95% CI, 0.625-0.677).ConclusionsHKUSS showed better categorization of HCC. In the context of primary surgical resection, HKUSS may be more appropriate for stratification of patients with HCC with various T stages, and thus the choice of staging system when primary surgical resection is considered for patients of HCC.
| S-EPMC8263888 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Purpose: To evaluate and improve the 7th edition International Union against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective review of the data from 905 patients with biopsy-proven non-disseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma was performed. All the patients were examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and received radiotherapy. Results: Satisfied distributions among the stages were observed in the 7th edition staging systems. LRFS only differed in classifications betweenT1 and T3, T1 and T4 (P=0.022 and P=0.016, respectively). Significant differences were observed between patients without and with masticator space involvement for OS, DMFS and PFS (p<0.05). No statistically significant differences in LRFS were observed among different groups with anatomical masticator space involvement. The DMFS between N2 and N3b, N3a and N3b were lack of significance (P=0.060 and P=0.59). The T category and N category were independent prognostic factors for the major endpoints in the Cox multivariate regression analysis (P<0.01). Conclusion: This study confirmed the prognostic value of the 7th edition UICC/AJCC staging system, the revisions of the 7th edition staging system are acceptable. However, our study also revealed limitations in the current staging system and suggested some potential modifications in future revision.
| S-EPMC5535722 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundIn 2017, the New South Wales Cancer Registry (NSWCR) participated in a project, supported by Cancer Australia, aiming to provide national stage data for melanoma, prostate, colorectal, breast, and lung cancers diagnosed in 2011. Simplified business rules based on the American Joint Committee for Cancer (AJCC) Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage were applied to obtain Registry-Derived (RD) stage, defined as the best estimate of TNM stage at diagnosis using routine notifications available within cancer registries. RD-stage was compared with Degree of Spread (DoS), which has been recorded for all applicable cancers in NSWCR at a population-based level since 1972, and a summary AJCC-TNM stage group, which has been collected variably since 2006. For each of the five high incidence cancers, we compared the level of improvements RD-staging provided in terms of completeness and accuracy (alignment to more clinically relevant AJCC-TNM) over DoS.MethodsFor each of the five cancers, stage data were extracted from NSWCR pre- and post- RD-staging to compare data completeness across all three staging systems. The alignment between DoS/RD-stage and AJCC-TNM was compared, as were the expected and observed cross-tabulated frequency distributions using a subset of NSWCR data. To determine differences between use of DoS, RD-stage, and AJCC-TNM in an epidemiological analysis, we compared survival models developed from each of the three stage variables.ResultsWe found RD-staging provided greatest stage data completeness and alignment to AJCC-TNM for prostate cancers, followed by breast, then melanoma and lung cancers. For colorectal cancer, summary stage from DoS was confirmed as an equivalent surrogate staging system to both AJCC-TNM and RD-stage.ConclusionsThis analysis provides an evidence-based approach that can be used to inform decision-making for resource planning and potential implementation of a new stage data field in population-based cancer registries.
| S-EPMC6714314 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study focused on improving the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system and demonstrated an improvement in prognostic accuracy and clinical management of colon cancer using the P-TNM staging system.Eligible patients (N=56,800) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014. The P-stage (P0 or P1) was assigned to each patient based on age at diagnosis, tumor grade, and tumor size. The outcome of interest was cancer-specific survival (CSS). The Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors and analyze the CSS probabilities of patients with colon cancer having different P-TNM stages, respectively.A total of 29,627 patients were assigned to P0-stage and 27,173 patients were assigned to P1-stage. The P1-stage was associated with a 98.1% increased risk of cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio =1.981, 95% confidence interval =1.891-2.076, P<0.001), which was higher in patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer. The P1-stage patients had improvement in CSS compared with those in P0-stage in respective stages (P<0.001). Moreover, CSS decreased in stage I-P1 compared with stage IIA-P0 or IIIA-P0 (P<0.001), stage IIIA-P1 compared with stage IIA-P0 (P<0.001), stage IIB-P1 compared with stage IIIB-P0 or IIC-P0 (P<0.001), stage IIIB-P1 compared with stage IIC-P0 (P<0.001), and stage IIC-P1 compared with stage IIIC-P0 (P<0.001).P-stage was an independent prognostic factor for colon cancer. This study strongly supported the incorporation of P-stage into the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for a better approach to prognostication and, thus, more individualized risk-adaptive therapies in colon cancer.
| S-EPMC6074826 | biostudies-other
Project description:TNM stage is not enough to accurately predict the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to establish the Immunoscore (IS) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), separately, and propose a new staging system in NSCLC. We used the multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mIHC) technology to detect 17 immune biomarkers of 304 patients with NSCLC. The LASSO-COX regression model was used to establish the ISNSCLC in the training cohorts. The ISNSCLC was then validated in the validation cohort. The constructed ISLUAD contained three immune features: CD4+CD73+ core of tumor (CT), PD-L1+ CT, and IDO+ invasive margin (IM). ISLUSC also contained two immune features: CD8+CD39-CD73- CT, CD8+Tim-3+ IM. In the training cohort, significant prognostic differences were found upon comparing low-ISNSCLC patients with high-ISNSCLC patients. For LUAD, the 5-y disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 54.7% vs. 8.1% and the 5-y overall survival (OS) rates were 82.4% vs. 36% (all P< .0001). For LUSC, the 5-y DFS rates were 74.0% vs. 14.7% and the 5-y OS rates were 78.2% vs. 17.6% (all P< .0001). Multivariate analyses indicated that ISNSCLC was an independent indicator for prognosis. Finally, we combined ISNSCLC with clinicopathological factors to establish a TN-I staging system and two nomogram models for clinical use. The TN-I stage had better prediction accuracy than TNM stage. The newly established ISLUAD and ISLUSC were completely different, and both were excellent indicators for the prognostic prediction. The TN-I stage could effectively improve prognostic accuracy and facilitate clinical application. Abbreviations NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; IS, Immunoscore; mIHC, multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma; CT, core of tumor; IM, invasive margin; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; SITC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer; FFPE, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded; MWT, microwave treatment; DCA, decision curve analysis; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.
| S-EPMC7553570 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesWe aimed to reconstitute T2 and T3 stage classification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cases and verify its utility in clinical settings.Materials and methodsWe enrolled 792 NPC patients. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the effect sizes (hazard ratio [HR]) of the cranial structure invasion on survival and select the structures for up-staging or downstaging T2 and T3 NPC. The samples were reclassified and the survival curves for T2 and T3 stages were analyzed. The proposed new staging system was validated on an external sample (n = 433).ResultsThirteen cranial structures were examined. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T3 stage patients with the invasion of the base of the sphenoid (HR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.16-5.77) or base of the pterygoid (HR = 2.00, 95% CI = 0.84-4.77) had significantly lower hazard ratios than T2 stage patients with the invasion of soft tissues in the bilateral parapharyngeal space (HR = 5.26, 95% CI = 2.02-13.68) and single/bilateral carotid sheath (HR = 7.78, 95% CI = 3.06-19.76). T3 stage with the invasion of the above-mentioned bones was reclassified as T2, and T2 stage with the invasion of the above-mentioned soft-tissue structures was reclassified as T3. Survival analysis showed a significant difference between the reclassified T2 and T3 stages (P < 0.001). The results were replicated in the validation samples.ConclusionThe proposed staging system for defining T2 and T3 stage NPC appears to be superior to the AJCC 8th edition. It could improve prognosis and optimize the treatment selection.
| S-EPMC7571804 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Ann Arbor stage has limited utility in the prognostication and treatment decision making in patients with NK/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL), as NKTCL is almost exclusively extranodal and the majority is localized at presentation for which radiotherapy is the most important treatment and local invasiveness is the most important prognostic factor. In this study, we attempted to establish a TNM (Tumor-Node-Metastasis) staging system for nasal NKTCL (N-NKTCL). The staging rules of other head and neck cancers were used as reference along with the data of our 271 eligible patients. The primary tumor was classified into T1 to T4, and cervical lymph node metastasis was classified into N0 to N2 according to the extent of involvement. Any lesions outside the head and neck were classified as M1. N-NKTCL thereby was classified into four stages: stage I comprised T1-2N0M0; stage II comprised T1-2N1M0 and T3N0M0; stage III comprised T3N1M0, T1-3N2M0, and T4N0-2M0; and stage IV comprised TanyNanyM1. This staging system showed excellent performance in prognosticating survival. In the current series, the 5-year survival rates of patients with stages I, II, III, and IV N-NKTCL were 92%, 64%, 23%, and 0, respectively. Moreover, the predictive value of several currently used factors was abrogated in the presence of the TNM stage. The TNM staging system is highly effective in stratifying tumor burden and survival risk, which may have significant implications in the treatment decision making for patients with N-NKTCL.
| S-EPMC4476596 | biostudies-literature