Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The possible association between HIF-1? C1772T polymorphism and cancer risk has been studied extensively. However, the results were controversial. In order to get a more precise conclusion of this association, a meta-analysis was performed.Methods
A total of 10186 cases and 10926 controls in 37 case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. Allele and genotypic differences between cases and controls were evaluated. Subgroup analysis by cancer site, ethnicity, source of controls and gender was performed.Results
The T allele of HIF-1? gene C1772T was significantly associated with increased cancer risk in three genetic models: TT+CT vs.CC (dominant model OR=1.23, 95%CI=1.03-1.47), TT vs. CT+CC (recessive model OR=2.51, 95%CI=1.54-4.09), TT vs. CC (homozygote comparison OR=2.02, 95%CI=1.21-3.39).In subgroup analysis, the frequency of the T variant was found to be significantly increased in cervical cancer, pancreatic cancer, head and neck cancer, renal cell carcinoma, Asian and female subgroups.Conclusions
Our meta-analysis suggests that the substitution of C allele with T at HIF-1? gene C1772T polymorphism is a risk factor of cancer, especially for cervical, head and neck cancer, pancreatic cancer and renal cell carcinoma. It is also a risk factor of cancer in Asian group as well as in female group.
SUBMITTER: He P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3867430 | biostudies-literature | 2013
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
He Pengfei P Han Qi Q Liu Jiajia J Liu Dongjuan D Zhao Xin X Hu Ting T Jiang Lu L Dan Hongxia H Zeng Xin X Li Jing J Wang Jiayi J Chen Qianming Q
PloS one 20131218 12
<h4>Background</h4>The possible association between HIF-1α C1772T polymorphism and cancer risk has been studied extensively. However, the results were controversial. In order to get a more precise conclusion of this association, a meta-analysis was performed.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 10186 cases and 10926 controls in 37 case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis. Allele and genotypic differences between cases and controls were evaluated. Subgroup analysis by cancer site, ethnicity ...[more]