Dataset Information

Interbirth interval and history of previous preeclampsia: a case-control study among multiparous women.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Preeclampsia is a disorder with a reported incidence of 2%-8% among all pregnancies, accounting for more than 50,000 deaths worldwide each year. In low- and middle- income countries maternal/perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with preeclampsia are high due to the lack of proper prenatal and hospital care and limited access to neonatal intensive care. The objectives of our study were to determine the association of long interbirth interval (IBI) and preeclampsia and to investigate the interactions between long IBI and other risk factors among multiparous women in Yerevan, Armenia.

Methods

We conducted a hospital-based case-control study among 36 multiparous women with preeclampsia (cases) and 148 without preeclampsia (controls) during their last pregnancy, selected from the two largest maternity hospitals in Armenia. The data were collected through telephone-based structured interviews and analyzed using STATA software. The study applied univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

The study found a significant interaction between IBI and previous history of preeclampsia. Among women without a history of previous preeclampsia, the odds of having preeclampsia among women with long IBI (greater than or equal to five years) was 6.88 time higher compared to those with short IBI (CI: 1.75-27.05; p = 0.006) after adjusting for confounders; among women with a history of previous preeclampsia the odds ratio was 0.60 (CI: 0.07-4.99; p = 0.638). The final fitted model for preeclampsia among multiparous women who had planned their pregnancies included IBI, time to pregnancy, Body Mass Index, method of contraception and household monthly income.

Conclusions

Long IBI appeared to be a strong risk factor for preeclampsia development only among women without a history of previous preeclampsia. This finding may contribute to a new approach in understanding the etiology of preeclampsia and may be useful for developing further recommendations for this particular subgroup of women that are at higher risk for preeclampsia development in subsequent pregnancies.

SUBMITTER: Harutyunyan A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3877952 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Early vascular aging (EVA) is associated with higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events and can be estimated noninvasively by assessing arterial hemodynamics. Women with a history of preeclampsia have increased risk of cardiovascular disease, but underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. We hypothesized that women with a history of preeclampsia display persistent arterial abnormalities and EVA in the postpartum period. Methods and Results We performed a comprehensive, noninvasive arterial hemodynamic evaluation in women with a history of preeclampsia (n=40) and age-matched controls with previous normotensive pregnancies (n=40). We used validated methods integrating applanation tonometry with transthoracic echocardiography to obtain measures of aortic stiffness, steady and pulsatile arterial load, central blood pressure, and arterial wave reflections. Presence of EVA was defined as aortic stiffness higher than that predicted from reference values based on the participant's age and blood pressure. The association of preeclampsia with arterial hemodynamic variables was assessed with multivariable linear regression, and the association of severe preeclampsia with EVA was assessed with multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for confounders. We found that women with a history of preeclampsia had greater aortic stiffness, steady arterial load, central blood pressure, and arterial wave reflections when compared with controls. We observed a dose-response relationship, with the greatest abnormalities observed in subgroups with severe, preterm, or recurrent preeclampsia. Women with severe preeclampsia had 9.23 times greater odds of having EVA as compared with controls (95% CI, 1.67-51.06, P=0.011) and 7.87 greater odds of EVA as compared with women with nonsevere preeclampsia (95% CI, 1.29-47.77, P=0.025). Conclusions Our study comprehensively characterizes arterial hemodynamic abnormalities after preeclampsia and suggests that specific subgroups of women with a history of preeclampsia exhibit greater alterations in arterial hemodynamics related to arterial health. Our findings have important implications for understanding potential links between preeclampsia and cardiovascular events, and suggest women with severe, preterm, or recurrent preeclampsia as subgroups who may deserve intensification of efforts for prevention and early detection of cardiovascular disease.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Leptin receptor gene (LEPR) variants may affect the leptin levels and act as a risk factor for preeclampsia. Two LEPR gene missense variants rs1137101 (c.668A>G) and rs1805094 (c.1968G>C) were investigated in Sudanese women with preeclampsia. METHODS:A matched case-control study (122 women in each arm) was conducted in Saad Abualila Maternity Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan from May to December 2018. The cases were women with preeclampsia and the controls were healthy pregnant women. Genotyping for LEPR gene variants c.668A>G and c.1968G>C was performed using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Logistic regression models (adjusted for age, parity, body mass index and hemoglobin level) were conducted. RESULTS:Genotype frequency of LEPR gene variants c.668A>G and c.1968G>C was in accordance with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P?>?0.05) in the controls. Allele G in LEPRc.668A>G variant was significantly more frequent in the cases compared with the controls [43.4% vs. 10.2%; OR?=?6.44; 95%CI (3.98-10.40); P?<?0.001]. In variant LEPRc.668A>G, genotype AG was the prevalent genotype in the cases compared with the controls, and it was significantly associated with preeclampsia risk [37.7% vs. 15.5%; AOR?=?3.48; 95%CI (1.15-10.54); P?= 0.027]. Likewise, the GG genotype was the second most common genotype in the cases compared with the controls, and was associated with preeclampsia risk [24.6% vs. 2.5%; AOR?=?14.19; 95%CI (1.77-113.76); P?=?0.012]. None of the LEPRc.1968G>C variant genotypes were associated with preeclampsia. The CC genotype was not detected in neither the cases nor the controls. The haplotype A-G 70.1% was the prevalent haplotype in this population, and it significantly protected against preeclampsia [OR?=?0.14; 95%CI (0.09-0.23); P?<?0.001]. However, the haplotype G-G 26.8% was significantly associated with preeclampsia risk [OR?=?6.70; 95%CI (4.16-11.05); P?<?0.001]. Both variants c.668A>G and c.1968G>C were in strong linkage disequilibrium (D'?=?1, r2?=?0.012). CONCLUSIONS:Our data indicate that the rs1137101 (c.668A>G) variant and G-G haplotype may independently associate with the development of preeclampsia.