Dataset Information

Comparing the biological impact of glatiramer acetate with the biological impact of a generic.

ABSTRACT: For decades, policies regarding generic medicines have sought to provide patients with economical access to safe and effective drugs, while encouraging the development of new therapies. This balance is becoming more challenging for physicians and regulators as biologics and non-biological complex drugs (NBCDs) such as glatiramer acetate demonstrate remarkable efficacy, because generics for these medicines are more difficult to assess. We sought to develop computational methods that use transcriptional profiles to compare branded medicines to generics, robustly characterizing differences in biological impact. We combined multiple computational methods to determine whether differentially expressed genes result from random variation, or point to consistent differences in biological impact of the generic compared to the branded medicine. We applied these methods to analyze gene expression data from mouse splenocytes exposed to either branded glatiramer acetate or a generic. The computational methods identified extensive evidence that branded glatiramer acetate has a more consistent biological impact across batches than the generic, and has a distinct impact on regulatory T cells and myeloid lineage cells. In summary, we developed a computational pipeline that integrates multiple methods to compare two medicines in an innovative way. This pipeline, and the specific findings distinguishing branded glatiramer acetate from a generic, can help physicians and regulators take appropriate steps to ensure safety and efficacy.

SUBMITTER: Towfic F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3885444 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparing the biological impact of glatiramer acetate with the biological impact of a generic.

Towfic Fadi F Funt Jason M JM Fowler Kevin D KD Bakshi Shlomo S Blaugrund Eran E Artyomov Maxim N MN Hayden Michael R MR Ladkani David D Schwartz Rivka R Zeskind Benjamin B

PloS one 20140108 1

For decades, policies regarding generic medicines have sought to provide patients with economical access to safe and effective drugs, while encouraging the development of new therapies. This balance is becoming more challenging for physicians and regulators as biologics and non-biological complex drugs (NBCDs) such as glatiramer acetate demonstrate remarkable efficacy, because generics for these medicines are more difficult to assess. We sought to develop computational methods that use transcrip ...[more]

PMID: 24421904

Similar Datasets

Project description:For decades, policies regarding generic medicines have sought to provide patients with economical access to safe and effective drugs, while encouraging the development of new therapies. This balance is becoming more challenging for physicians and regulators as biologics and non-biological complex drugs (NBCDs) such as glatiramer acetate demonstrate remarkable efficacy, because generics for these medicines are more difficult to assess. We sought to develop computational methods that use transcriptional profiles to compare branded medicines to generics, robustly characterizing differences in biological impact. We combined multiple computational methods to determine whether differentially expressed genes result from random variation, or point to consistent differences in biological impact of the generic compared to the branded medicine. We applied these methods to analyze gene expression data from mouse splenocytes exposed to either branded glatiramer acetate or a generic. The computational methods identified extensive evidence that branded glatiramer acetate has a more consistent biological impact across batches than the generic, and has a distinct impact on regulatory T cells and myeloid lineage cells. In summary, we developed a computational pipeline that integrates multiple methods to compare two medicines in an innovative way. This pipeline, and the specific findings distinguishing branded glatiramer acetate from a generic, can help physicians and regulators take appropriate steps to ensure safety and efficacy. Glatiramoid samples for SPL cell activation were grouped into four categories: 1) Verified GA, which included GA-RS (22 biological samples) and GA drug product (GA-DP, 34 biological samples from 30 batches) manufactured by Teva; 2) Deliberately Modified GA (DM-GA; 9 biological samples), which included glatiramoids made by Teva that were similar to GA but modified in a variety of ways: prepared with different ingredients (e.g., missing a constituent amino acid); prepared with the same amino acids in the same molar ratio as GA, but with defined amino acid sequences and different molecular weights (referred to as peptide markers TV-35 and TV-66); synthesized by a different process (e.g., changing acetolytic cleavage conditions, alternating polymerization initiator); exposed to destabilizing conditions (e.g., degradation by acid, base, and heat); 3) Unverified Glatiramoids, which included 4 biological samples, TV-5010 and 3 glatiramoids synthesized to be similar to GA but not manufactured using the Teva-patented manufacturing process; and 4) Unverified Generic GA, which included samples from 2 glatiramoids (M-bM-^@M-^\GA-QM-bM-^@M-^] 11 biological samples from 5 different batches, and 2 M-bM-^@M-^\GA-CM-bM-^@M-^] samples from a single batch) marketed as generic GA manufactured by companies other than Teva.

Project description:Background: Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a well-established treatment option for patients with clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) with few side effects. The double transgenic mouse model spontaneous opticospinal encephalomyelitis (OSE), based on recombinant myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein35-55 reactive T and B cells, mimicks features of chronic inflammation and degeneration in MS and related disorders. Here, we investigated the effects of prophylactic GA treatment on the clinical course, histological alterations and peripheral immune cells in OSE. Objective: To investigate the effects of prophylactic glatiramer acetate (GA) treatment in a mouse model of spontaneous opticospinal encephalomyelitis (OSE). Methods: OSE mice with a postnatal age of 21 to 28 days without signs of encephalomyelitis were treated once daily either with 150 µg GA or vehicle intraperitoneally (i. p.). The animals were scored daily regarding clinical signs and weight. The animals were sacrificed after 30 days of treatment or after having reached a score of 7.0 due to animal care guidelines. We performed immunohistochemistry of spinal cord sections and flow cytometry analysis of immune cells. Results: Preventive treatment with 150 µg GA i. p. once daily significantly reduced clinical disease progression with a mean score of 3.9 ± 1.0 compared to 6.2 ± 0.7 in control animals (p < 0.01) after 30 d in accordance with positive effects on weight (p < 0.001). The immunohistochemistry showed that general inflammation, demyelination or CD11c+ dendritic cell infiltration did not differ. There was, however, a modest reduction of the Iba1+ area (p < 0.05) and F4/80+ area upon GA treatment (p < 0.05). The immune cell composition of secondary lymphoid organs showed a trend towards an upregulation of regulatory T cells, which lacked significance. Conclusions: Preventive treatment with GA reduces disease progression in OSE in line with modest effects on microglia/macrophages. Due to the lack of established prophylactic treatment options for chronic autoimmune diseases with a high risk of disability, our study could provide valuable indications for translational medicine.

Project description:BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a brand-generic glatiramer acetate product in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis over a 12-month period. A noninterventional cohort study was conducted on 185 patients. The patients had a confirmed and documented diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis as defined by the Revised McDonald Criteria (2010), were ambulatory with a Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0 to 5.5, and their treatment by glatiramer acetate 40 mg/mL was just started.MethodsAdverse drug reactions, relapse rate, magnetic resonance imaging parameters, and Expanded Disability Status Scale score were evaluated over 1 year.ResultsOf 185 enrolled patients from 21 different cities, 170 completed the study. The mean (SD) Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 1.97 (0.75) at the time of screening. The mean age was 33 years with an average of 4-year multiple sclerosis history, and 83% were women. Hepatic disorder and depression were the most frequent medical history. The most common adverse drug reactions were local pain (45.4%) and erythema (38.9%). The immediate postinjection reactions included dyspnea (10.3%), anxiety (9.7%), palpitation (8.1%), urticaria (5.4%), flushing (3.24%), chest pain (2.16%), and throat constriction (0.54%). The percentage of relapse-free patients at Month 12 was 87%, and the annual relapse rate was 0.134. An increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale score was observed in 20% of patients, and new T2 and gadolinium-enhancing lesions were found in 34.7% and 9.4%, respectively. The rate of treatment failure was 1.6% and 4.3% according to the Modified Rio and Rio scores, respectively.ConclusionsThe 40 mg brand-generic glatiramer acetate product was well tolerated in this selected group of Iranian patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, and patient adherence was favorable over 1 year. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2018; 79:XXX-XXX).

Dataset Information

Comparing the biological impact of glatiramer acetate with the biological impact of a generic.

Publications

Comparing the biological impact of glatiramer acetate with the biological impact of a generic.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets