Dataset Information

ΔFosB induction correlates inversely with CB₁ receptor desensitization in a brain region-dependent manner following repeated Δ⁹-THC administration.

ABSTRACT: Repeated Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) administration produces desensitization and downregulation of cannabinoid type 1 receptors (CB₁Rs) in the brain, but the magnitude of these adaptations varies among regions. CB₁Rs in the striatum and its output regions exhibit the least magnitude and slowest development of desensitization and downregulation. The molecular mechanisms that confer these region-dependent differences are not known. The stable transcription factor, ΔFosB, is induced in the striatum following repeated THC administration and could regulate CB₁Rs. To directly compare the regional profile of ΔFosB induction and CB₁R desensitization and downregulation, mice were treated with THC (10 mg/kg) or vehicle for 13.5 days. CP55,940-stimulated [(35)S]GTPγS autoradiography and immunohistochemistry were performed to measure CB₁R desensitization and downregulation, respectively, and ΔFosB expression was measured by immunoblot. Significant CB₁R desensitization and downregulation occurred in the prefrontal cortex, lateral amygdala and hippocampus; desensitization was found in the basomedial amygdala and no changes were seen in remaining regions. ΔFosB was induced in the prefrontal cortex, caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens and lateral amygdala. An inverse regional relationship between ΔFosB expression and CB₁R desensitization was found, such that regions with the greatest ΔFosB induction did not exhibit CB₁R desensitization and areas without ΔFosB induction had the greatest desensitization, with remaining regions exhibiting intermediate levels of both. Dual immunohistochemistry in the striatum showed both CB₁R co-localization with ΔFosB in cells and CB₁R puncta surrounding ΔFosB-positive cells. THC-induced expression of ΔFosB was absent in the striatum of CB₁R knockout mice. These data suggest that transcriptional targets of ΔFosB might inhibit CB₁R desensitization and/or that ΔFosB induction could be limited by CB₁R desensitization.

SUBMITTER: Lazenka MF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3888085 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

ΔFosB induction correlates inversely with CB₁ receptor desensitization in a brain region-dependent manner following repeated Δ⁹-THC administration.

Lazenka Matthew F MF Selley Dana E DE Sim-Selley Laura J LJ

Neuropharmacology 20130930

Repeated Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) administration produces desensitization and downregulation of cannabinoid type 1 receptors (CB₁Rs) in the brain, but the magnitude of these adaptations varies among regions. CB₁Rs in the striatum and its output regions exhibit the least magnitude and slowest development of desensitization and downregulation. The molecular mechanisms that confer these region-dependent differences are not known. The stable transcription factor, ΔFosB, is induced in the stri ...[more]

PMID: 24090766

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundProducts containing delta-8-THC became widely available in most of the USA following the 2018 Farm Bill and by late 2020 were core products of hemp processing companies, especially where delta-9-THC use remained illegal or required medical authorization. Research on experiences with delta-8-THC is scarce, some state governments have prohibited it because of this lack of knowledge.ObjectiveWe conducted an exploratory study addressing a broad range of issues regarding delta-8-THC to inform policy discussions and provide directions for future systematic research.MethodsWe developed an online survey for delta-8-THC consumers, including qualities of delta-8-THC experiences, comparisons with delta-9-THC, and open-ended feedback. The survey included quantitative and qualitative aspects to provide a rich description and content for future hypothesis testing. Invitations to participate were distributed by a manufacturer of delta-8-THC products via social media accounts, email contact list, and the Delta8 Reddit.com discussion board. Participants (N = 521) mostly identified as White/European American (90%) and male (57%). Pairwise t tests compared delta-8-THC effect rating items; one-sample t tests examined responses to delta-9-THC comparison items.ResultsMost delta-8-THC users experienced a lot or a great deal of relaxation (71%); euphoria (68%) and pain relief (55%); a moderate amount or a lot of cognitive distortions such as difficulty concentrating (81%), difficulties with short-term memory (80%), and alerted sense of time (74%); and did not experience anxiety (74%) or paranoia (83%). Participants generally compared delta-8-THC favorably with both delta-9-THC and pharmaceutical drugs, with most participants reporting substitution for delta-9-THC (57%) and pharmaceutical drugs (59%). Participant concerns regarding delta-8-THC were generally focused on continued legal access.ConclusionsDelta-8-THC may provide much of the experiential benefits of delta-9-THC with lesser adverse effects. Future systematic research is needed to confirm participant reports, although these studies are hindered by the legal statuses of both delta-8-THC and delta-9-THC. Cross-sector collaborations among academics, government officials, and representatives from the cannabis industry may accelerate the generation of knowledge regarding delta-8-THC and other cannabinoids. A strength of this study is that it is the first large survey of delta-8 users, limitations include self-report data from a self-selected convenience sample.

Project description:Introduction: Compounds present in Cannabis sativa such as phytocannabinoids and terpenoids may act in concert to elicit therapeutic effects. Cannabinoids such as Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) directly activate cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) and cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2); however, it is not known if terpenoids present in Cannabis also affect cannabinoid receptor signaling. Therefore, we examined six common terpenoids alone, and in combination with cannabinoid receptor agonists, on CB1 and CB2 signaling in vitro. Materials and Methods: Potassium channel activity in AtT20 FlpIn cells transfected with human CB1 or CB2 receptors was measured in real time using FLIPR® membrane potential dye in a FlexStation 3 plate reader. Terpenoids were tested individually and in combination for periods up to 30 min. Endogenous somatostatin receptors served as a control for direct effects of drugs on potassium channels. Results: α-Pinene, β-pinene, β-caryophyllene, linalool, limonene, and β-myrcene (up to 30-100 μM) did not change membrane potential in AtT20 cells expressing CB1 or CB2, or affect the response to a maximally effective concentration of the synthetic cannabinoid CP55,940. The presence of individual or a combination of terpenoids did not affect the hyperpolarization produced by Δ9-THC (10 μM): (CB1: control, 59%±7%; with terpenoids (10 μM each) 55%±4%; CB2: Δ9-THC 16%±5%, with terpenoids (10 μM each) 17%±4%). To investigate possible effect on desensitization of CB1 responses, all six terpenoids were added together with Δ9-THC and signaling measured continuously over 30 min. Terpenoids did not affect desensitization, after 30 min the control hyperpolarization recovered by 63%±6% in the presence of the terpenoids recovery was 61%±5%. Discussion: None of the six of the most common terpenoids in Cannabis directly activated CB1 or CB2, or modulated the signaling of the phytocannabinoid agonist Δ9-THC. These results suggest that if a phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effect exists, it is not at the CB1 or CB2 receptor level. It remains possible that terpenoids activate CB1 and CB2 signaling pathways that do not involve potassium channels; however, it seems more likely that they may act at different molecular target(s) in the neuronal circuits important for the behavioral effect of Cannabis.

Project description:In addition to overt somatic symptoms, cannabinoid withdrawal can also manifest as disruptions in motivation and attention. Experimental animal models using operant-conditioning approaches reveal these differences, in either antagonist-precipitated or spontaneous withdrawal models. However, these processes have yet to be characterized in the same subjects simultaneously. To differentiate between motivational and attentional processes disrupted in cannabinoid withdrawal, the current study used a response alternation task in which a fixed-ratio (FR) schedule repeatedly alternated between two spatially distinct response options throughout daily training sessions. This task yielded traditional measures of motivation (e.g., response latency) as well as attention (e.g., responses to the incorrect side). After two weeks of training, male and female C57BL/6 J mice either received vehicle or Δ9-THC (10 mg/kg, s.c.) twice daily for 5 days. On the 6th day, all mice received their final injection of vehicle or Δ9-THC followed 30 min later by injection of the CB1 receptor selective inverse agonist rimonabant (2 mg/kg, i.p.) to precipitate withdrawal. Testing continued for 3 days post-rimonabant to assess how THC abstinence impacted task performance. Whereas rimonabant decreased response rates to equal degrees in THC-treated and vehicle-treated mice, THC-treated mice showed longer session times, longer response latencies, and more errors per reinforcer. Only THC-treated mice showed a longer latency to switch after committing an error reflecting that precipitated withdrawal impacted measures of both motivation and attention. During the 3-day abstinence window, performance of vehicle-treated mice returned to baseline, but THC-treated mice continued to show disruptions in motivational measures. Importantly, attentional measures (errors and latency to switch after an error) were unaffected by THC abstinence. These data suggest that precipitated and "spontaneous" cannabinoid withdrawal may be qualitatively and quantitatively distinct withdrawal conditions with precipitated withdrawal disrupting both attentional and motivational processes, while abstinence may only affect motivation.

Dataset Information

ΔFosB induction correlates inversely with CB₁ receptor desensitization in a brain region-dependent manner following repeated Δ⁹-THC administration.

Publications

ΔFosB induction correlates inversely with CB₁ receptor desensitization in a brain region-dependent manner following repeated Δ⁹-THC administration.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets