SMA valiant trial: a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of valproic acid in ambulatory adults with spinal muscular atrophy.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Kissel JT
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3888833 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
SMA valiant trial: a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of valproic acid in ambulatory adults with spinal muscular atrophy.
Kissel John T JT Elsheikh Bakri B King Wendy M WM Freimer Miriam M Scott Charles B CB Kolb Stephen J SJ Reyna Sandra P SP Crawford Thomas O TO Simard Louise R LR Krosschell Kristin J KJ Acsadi Gyula G Schroth Mary K MK D'Anjou Guy G LaSalle Bernard B Prior Thomas W TW Sorenson Susan S Maczulski Jo Anne JA Swoboda Kathryn J KJ
Muscle & nerve 20140201 2
<h4>Introduction</h4>An open-label trial suggested that valproic acid (VPA) improved strength in adults with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). We report a 12-month, double-blind, cross-over study of VPA in ambulatory SMA adults.<h4>Methods</h4>There were 33 subjects, aged 20–55 years, included in this investigation. After baseline assessment, subjects were randomized to receive VPA (10–20 mg/kg/day) or placebo. At 6 months, patients were switched to the other group. Assessments were performed at 3, ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundValproic acid (VPA) has demonstrated potential as a therapeutic candidate for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in vitro and in vivo.MethodsTwo cohorts of subjects were enrolled in the SMA CARNIVAL TRIAL, a non-ambulatory group of "sitters" (cohort 1) and an ambulatory group of "walkers" (cohort 2). Here, we present results for cohort 1: a multicenter phase II randomized double-blind intention-to-treat protocol in non-ambulatory SMA subjects 2-8 years of age. Sixty-one subjects were randomized 1:1 to placebo or treatment for the first six months; all received active treatment the subsequent six months. The primary outcome was change in the modified Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale (MHFMS) score following six months of treatment. Secondary outcomes included safety and adverse event data, and change in MHFMS score for twelve versus six months of active treatment, body composition, quantitative SMN mRNA levels, maximum ulnar CMAP amplitudes, myometry and PFT measures.ResultsAt 6 months, there was no difference in change from the baseline MHFMS score between treatment and placebo groups (difference = 0.643, 95% CI = -1.22-2.51). Adverse events occurred in >80% of subjects and were more common in the treatment group. Excessive weight gain was the most frequent drug-related adverse event, and increased fat mass was negatively related to change in MHFMS values (p = 0.0409). Post-hoc analysis found that children ages two to three years that received 12 months treatment, when adjusted for baseline weight, had significantly improved MHFMS scores (p = 0.03) compared to those who received placebo the first six months. A linear regression analysis limited to the influence of age demonstrates young age as a significant factor in improved MHFMS scores (p = 0.007).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated no benefit from six months treatment with VPA and L-carnitine in a young non-ambulatory cohort of subjects with SMA. Weight gain, age and treatment duration were significant confounding variables that should be considered in the design of future trials.Trial registryClinicaltrials.gov NCT00227266.
| S-EPMC2924376 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUNDMultiple lines of evidence have suggested that valproic acid (VPA) might benefit patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The SMA CARNIVAL TRIAL was a two part prospective trial to evaluate oral VPA and L-carnitine in SMA children. Part 1 targeted non-ambulatory children ages 2-8 in a 12 month cross over design. We report here Part 2, a twelve month prospective, open-label trial of VPA and L-carnitine in ambulatory SMA children.METHODSThis study involved 33 genetically proven type 3 SMA subjects ages 3-17 years. Subjects underwent two baseline assessments over 4-6 weeks and then were placed on VPA and L-carnitine for 12 months. Assessments were performed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcomes included safety, adverse events and the change at 6 and 12 months in motor function assessed using the Modified Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Extend (MHFMS-Extend), timed motor tests and fine motor modules. Secondary outcomes included changes in ulnar compound muscle action potential amplitudes (CMAP), handheld dynamometry, pulmonary function, and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory scores.RESULTSTwenty-eight subjects completed the study. VPA and carnitine were generally well tolerated. Although adverse events occurred in 85% of subjects, they were usually mild and transient. Weight gain of 20% above body weight occurred in 17% of subjects. There was no significant change in any primary outcome at six or 12 months. Some pulmonary function measures showed improvement at one year as expected with normal growth. CMAP significantly improved suggesting a modest biologic effect not clinically meaningful.CONCLUSIONSThis study, coupled with the CARNIVAL Part 1 study, indicate that VPA is not effective in improving strength or function in SMA children. The outcomes used in this study are feasible and reliable, and can be employed in future trials in SMA. TRIAL REGSITRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00227266.
| S-EPMC3130730 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Hereditary proximal spinal muscular atrophy causes weakness and increased fatigability of repetitive motor functions. The neuromuscular junction is anatomically and functionally abnormal in patients with spinal muscular atrophy. Pharmacological improvement of neuromuscular transmission may therefore represent a promising additional treatment strategy. We conducted a Phase II, monocentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial with the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor pyridostigmine in treatment-naïve patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 2-4. We investigated the safety and efficacy of pyridostigmine on fatigability and motor function. Each participant received pyridostigmine and a placebo for 8 weeks, in random order. Primary outcomes were the repeated nine-hole peg test for fatigability and motor function measure. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported effects, endurance shuttle test combined scores and adverse events. We included 35 patients. For the repeated nine-hole peg test, the mean difference was 0.17 s/trial (95% confidence interval: -1.17-1.49; P = 0.8), favouring placebo, and for the motor function measure, 0.74% (95% confidence interval: 0.00-1.49; P = 0.05), favouring pyridostigmine. Around 74% of patients reported medium-to-large beneficial effects of pyridostigmine on fatigability, compared with 29.7% in the placebo arm. This was paralleled by a reduced dropout risk of 70% on the endurance shuttle test combined scores (hazard ratio: 0.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.58) under pyridostigmine. Adverse events, mostly mild and self-limiting, occurred more frequently under pyridostigmine. No serious adverse events related to the study medication were observed. Patients with spinal muscular atrophy tolerated pyridostigmine well. There were no significant differences in primary outcomes, but the self-reported reduction of fatigability and improved endurance shuttle test combined score performance suggest that pyridostigmine may be useful as an additional therapy to survival motor neuron-augmenting drugs. Trial registration number: EudraCT: 2011-004369-34, NCT02941328.
| S-EPMC9825780 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundClinical trials of therapies for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) that are designed to increase the expression the SMN protein ideally include careful assessment of relevant SMN biomarkers.ObjectiveIn the SMA VALIANT trial, a recent double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study of valproic acid (VPA) in ambulatory adult subjects with SMA, we investigated relevant pharmacodynamic biomarkers in blood samples from SMA subjects by direct longitudinal measurement of histone acetylation and SMN mRNA and protein levels in the presence and absence of VPA treatment.MethodsThirty-three subjects were randomized to either VPA or placebo for the first 6 months followed by crossover to the opposite arm for an additional 6 months. Outcome measures were compared between the two treatments (VPA and placebo) using a standard crossover analysis.ResultsA significant increase in histone H4 acetylation was observed with VPA treatment (p = 0.005). There was insufficient evidence to suggest a treatment effect with either full length or truncated SMN mRNA transcript levels or SMN protein levels.ConclusionsThese measures were consistent with the observed lack of change in the primary clinical outcome measure in the VALIANT trial. These results also highlight the added benefit of molecular and pharmacodynamic biomarker measurements in the interpretation of clinical trial outcomes.
| S-EPMC5271431 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disease where a deficient amount of SMN protein leads to progressive lower motor neuron degeneration. SMN-enhancing therapies are now available. Yet, fatigue and signs of impaired neuromuscular junction (NMJ) transmission could contribute to SMA phenotype. Amifampridine prolongs presynaptic NMJ terminal depolarization, enhancing neuromuscular transmission.MethodsSMA-001 was a phase 2, 1:1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Ambulatory (walking unaided at least 30 m) SMA Type 3 patients, untreated with SMN-enhancing medications, entered a run-in phase where amifampridine was titrated up to an optimized stable dose. Patients achieving at least three points improvement in Hammersmith Functional Motor Score Expanded (HFMSE) were randomized to amifampridine or placebo, alternatively, in the 28-day double-blind crossover phase. Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AE) collection. Primary efficacy measure was the HFMSE change from randomization. Secondary outcomes included timed tests and quality of life assessment. Descriptive analyses and a mixed effects linear model were used for statistics.ResultsFrom 14 January 2019, 13 patients, mean age 34.5 years (range 18-53), with 5/13 (38.5%) females, were included. No serious AE were reported. Transient paresthesia (33.3%) was the only amifampridine-related AE. Six patients for each treatment sequence were randomized. Amifampridine treatment led to a statistically significant improvement in HFMSE (mean difference 0.792; 95% CI from 0.22 to 1.37; p = 0.0083), compared to placebo, but not in secondary outcomes.DiscussionSMA-001 study provided Class II evidence that amifampridine was safe and effective in treating ambulatory SMA type 3 patients.Clinical trial registrationNCT03781479; EUDRACT 2017-004,600-22.
| S-EPMC9243784 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The benefits of exercise on long-term health and well-being are well established. The possible benefits of exercise in Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) have not been explored in a controlled clinical trial format.To assess the effects of exercise on measures of function, strength, and exercise capacity in ambulatory SMA patients.Fourteen participants, ages 10-48 years, were randomized to control and exercise cohorts after a 1 month lead-in period. The exercise group received 6 months of intervention. Thereafter, both groups received the intervention for the remaining 12 months. Participants were monitored for a total of 19 months. Exercise included individualized home-based cycling and strengthening. The primary outcome measure was distance walked during the six-minute walk test (6MWT). Secondary outcomes included strength, function, exercise capacity, quality of life and fatigue.Twelve participants completed the first 7 months of the study, and 9 completed all 19 months. At baseline, the groups were similar on all clinical variables. There were no group changes at any time point in the 6MWT, fatigue, or function. Percent-predicted VO2 max improved 4.9% in all participants in 6 months (p?=?0.036) (n?=?10).Daily exercise is safe in ambulatory SMA and should be encouraged. We did not uncover any deleterious effects on strength, function, or fatigue. Our study documented a reduction in oxidative capacity and a blunted conditioning response to exercise possibly representing an important insight into underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. These findings also may be linked causally to mitochondrial depletion in SMA and warrant further study.
| S-EPMC5240606 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesSpinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) presents challenges in (i) monitoring disease activity and predicting progression, (ii) designing trials that allow rapid assessment of candidate therapies, and (iii) understanding molecular causes and consequences of the disease. Validated biomarkers of SMA motor and non-motor function would offer utility in addressing these challenges. Our objectives were (i) to discover additional markers from the Biomarkers for SMA (BforSMA) study using an immunoassay platform, and (ii) to validate the putative biomarkers in an independent cohort of SMA patients collected from a multi-site natural history study (NHS).MethodsBforSMA study plasma samples (N?=?129) were analyzed by immunoassay to identify new analytes correlating to SMA motor function. These immunoassays included the strongest candidate biomarkers identified previously by chromatography. We selected 35 biomarkers to validate in an independent cohort SMA type 1, 2, and 3 samples (N?=?158) from an SMA NHS. The putative biomarkers were tested for association to multiple motor scales and to pulmonary function, neurophysiology, strength, and quality of life measures. We implemented a Tobit model to predict SMA motor function scores.Results12 of the 35 putative SMA biomarkers were significantly associated (p<0.05) with motor function, with a 13(th) analyte being nearly significant. Several other analytes associated with non-motor SMA outcome measures. From these 35 biomarkers, 27 analytes were selected for inclusion in a commercial panel (SMA-MAP) for association with motor and other functional measures.ConclusionsDiscovery and validation using independent cohorts yielded a set of SMA biomarkers significantly associated with motor function and other measures of SMA disease activity. A commercial SMA-MAP biomarker panel was generated for further testing in other SMA collections and interventional trials. Future work includes evaluating the panel in other neuromuscular diseases, for pharmacodynamic responsiveness to experimental SMA therapies, and for predicting functional changes over time in SMA patients.
| S-EPMC3615018 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Study of gene expression profiles of muscular and neuronal mouse mutant of spinal muscular atrophy(SMA). Pre and post symptomatic stage disease have been analyzed.
2005-05-20 | E-MEXP-131 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:BackgroundSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive muscular weakness, which occurs in one in 6,000 to 10,000 live births. The burden of SMA on Canadian patients and caregivers is not known.ObjectiveTo characterize the burden of SMA in Canada as reported by patients and caregivers, including disease and treatment impacts, indirect costs, and caregiver burden.MethodsSurveys were distributed by Cure SMA Canada and Muscular Dystrophy Canada to individuals with SMA and their caregivers. The online surveys were anonymous and completed between January 28 and February 21, 2020.Results965 patient and 962 caregiver responses met the eligibility criteria. Patients reported SMA subtypes as: type I (25.0%), type II (41.3%), type III (29.3%). Using the EQ-5D, patients were shown to have impaired quality of life with an average health utility index of 0.49 (SD: 0.26). The median expenditure was $4,500 CAD (IQR: $1,587 - $11,000) for assistive devices; $6,800 CAD (IQR: $3,900-$13,000) on health professional services; and $1,200 CAD (IQR: $600 -$3,100) on SMA-related travel and accommodation in the past 12 months. Caregivers reported needing respite care (45.7%), physiotherapy for an injury from a lift/transfer (45.7%), or other health impacts (63.3%). Caregivers reported changes to personal plans, sleep disturbances, and work adjustments, with a mean Caregiver Strain Index score of 7.5 [SD: 3.3].ConclusionSMA in Canada is associated with a significant burden for patients and their caregivers.
| S-EPMC8385498 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare, progressive neuromuscular disease that affects individuals with a broad age range. SMA is typically characterised by symmetrical muscle weakness but is also associated with cardiac defects, life-limiting impairments in respiratory function and bulbar function defects that affect swallowing and speech. Despite the advent of three innovative disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for SMA, the cost of DMTs in addition to the costs of standard of care can be a barrier to treatment access for patients. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) decision makers evaluate the cost effectiveness of a new treatment before making a reimbursement decision.ObjectiveThe primary objective was to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify the modelling approaches used in economic evaluations that assess current approved treatments in SMA, with a secondary objective to widen the scope and identify economic evaluations assessing other (non-SMA) neuromuscular disorders.MethodsAn SLR was performed to identify available economic evaluations associated with any type of SMA (Type 1, 2, 3 and/or 4). Economic evaluations associated with other (non-SMA) neuromuscular disorders were identified but not further analysed. Electronic searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews and EconLit via the Ovid platform in August 2019, and were supplemented by searches of the grey literature (reference lists, conference proceedings, global HTA body websites and other relevant sources). Eligibility criteria were based on the population, interventions, comparators and outcomes (PICO) framework. Quality assessment of full publications was conducted with reference to a published checklist.ResultsNine publications covering eight unique studies met all eligibility criteria for inclusion in the SLR, including four conference abstracts, two peer-reviewed original research articles and three HTA submissions (conducted in Canada, the US and the UK). Evaluations considered patients with early infantile-onset (most likely to develop Type 1 or Type 2 SMA), later-onset SMA and both infantile- and later-onset SMA. Data for the identified economic models were collected from literature reviews and relatively short-term clinical trials. Several intent-to-treat clinical trial populations were used in the studies, which resulted in variation in cycle length and different outcome measures to determine clinical efficacy. The results of the quality assessment on the five full-text, peer-reviewed publications found that they generally provided clear descriptions of objectives, modelling methods and results. However, key decisions, such as choice of economic evaluation, model type and choice of variables for sensitivity analysis, were often not adequately justified.ConclusionsThis SLR highlights the need for economic evaluations in SMA to better align in modelling approaches with respect to (i) consistency in model structure and use of motor function milestones as health states; (ii) consensus on measuring quality of life to estimate utilities; (iii) consistency in data collection by registries; and (iv) consensus on SMA-type classification and endpoints that determine intervention efficacy. Future economic evaluations should also incorporate the review group critiques of previous HTA submissions relating to data inputs and approaches to modelling and should include patient data reflective of the SMA population being modelled. Economic evaluations would also be improved with inclusion of long-term efficacy and safety data from clinical trials and valid patient and caregiver utility data.
| S-EPMC8994739 | biostudies-literature