Futility rules in bioequivalence trials with sequential designs.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Health Canada, the US Food and Drug Administration, as well as the European Medicines Agency consider sequential designs acceptable for bioequivalence studies as long as the type I error is controlled at 5%. The EU guideline explicitly asks for specification of stopping rules, so the goal of this work is to investigate how stopping rules may affect type I errors and power for recently published sequential bioequivalence trial designs. Using extensive trial simulations, five different futility rules were evaluated for their effect on type I error rates and power in two-stage scenarios. Under some circumstances, notably low sample size in stage 1 and/or high variability power may be very severely affected by the stopping rules, whereas type I error rates appear less affected. Because applica
SUBMITTER: Fuglsang A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3889523 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA