Dataset Information

Fully automated segmentation of the pons and midbrain using human T1 MR brain images.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

This paper describes a novel method to automatically segment the human brainstem into midbrain and pons, called labs: Landmark-based Automated Brainstem Segmentation. LABS processes high-resolution structural magnetic resonance images (MRIs) according to a revised landmark-based approach integrated with a thresholding method, without manual interaction.

Methods

This method was first tested on morphological T1-weighted MRIs of 30 healthy subjects. Its reliability was further confirmed by including neurological patients (with Alzheimer's Disease) from the ADNI repository, in whom the presence of volumetric loss within the brainstem had been previously described. Segmentation accuracies were evaluated against expert-drawn manual delineation. To evaluate the quality of LABS segmentation we used volumetric, spatial overlap and distance-based metrics.

Results

The comparison between the quantitative measurements provided by LABS against manual segmentations revealed excellent results in healthy controls when considering either the midbrain (DICE measures higher that 0.9; Volume ratio around 1 and Hausdorff distance around 3) or the pons (DICE measures around 0.93; Volume ratio ranging 1.024-1.05 and Hausdorff distance around 2). Similar performances were detected for AD patients considering segmentation of the pons (DICE measures higher that 0.93; Volume ratio ranging from 0.97-0.98 and Hausdorff distance ranging 1.07-1.33), while LABS performed lower for the midbrain (DICE measures ranging 0.86-0.88; Volume ratio around 0.95 and Hausdorff distance ranging 1.71-2.15).

Conclusions

Our study represents the first attempt to validate a new fully automated method for in vivo segmentation of two anatomically complex brainstem subregions. We retain that our method might represent a useful tool for future applications in clinical practice.

SUBMITTER: Nigro S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3904850 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Fully automated segmentation of the pons and midbrain using human T1 MR brain images.

Nigro Salvatore S Cerasa Antonio A Zito Giancarlo G Perrotta Paolo P Chiaravalloti Francesco F Donzuso Giulia G Fera Franceso F Bilotta Eleonora E Pantano Pietro P Quattrone Aldo A

PloS one 20140128 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>This paper describes a novel method to automatically segment the human brainstem into midbrain and pons, called labs: Landmark-based Automated Brainstem Segmentation. LABS processes high-resolution structural magnetic resonance images (MRIs) according to a revised landmark-based approach integrated with a thresholding method, without manual interaction.<h4>Methods</h4>This method was first tested on morphological T1-weighted MRIs of 30 healthy subjects. Its reliability was furthe ...[more]

PMID: 24489664

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose: To examine the feasibility and potential difficulties of automatically generating radiologic reports (RRs) to articulate the clinically important features of brain magnetic resonance (MR) images. Materials and Methods: We focused on examining brain atrophy by using magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) images. The technology was based on multi-atlas whole-brain segmentation that identified 283 structures, from which larger superstructures were created to represent the anatomic units most frequently used in RRs. Through two layers of data-reduction filters, based on anatomic and clinical knowledge, raw images (~10 MB) were converted to a few kilobytes of human-readable sentences. The tool was applied to images from 92 patients with memory problems, and the results were compared to RRs independently produced by three experienced radiologists. The mechanisms of disagreement were investigated to understand where machine-human interface succeeded or failed. Results: The automatically generated sentences had low sensitivity (mean: 24.5%) and precision (mean: 24.9%) values; these were significantly lower than the inter-rater sensitivity (mean: 32.7%) and precision (mean: 32.2%) of the radiologists. The causes of disagreement were divided into six error categories: mismatch of anatomic definitions (7.2 ± 9.3%), data-reduction errors (11.4 ± 3.9%), translator errors (3.1 ± 3.1%), difference in the spatial extent of used anatomic terms (8.3 ± 6.7%), segmentation quality (9.8 ± 2.0%), and threshold for sentence-triggering (60.2 ± 16.3%). Conclusion: These error mechanisms raise interesting questions about the potential of automated report generation and the quality of image reading by humans. The most significant discrepancy between the human and automatically generated RRs was caused by the sentence-triggering threshold (the degree of abnormality), which was fixed to z-score >2.0 for the automated generation, while the thresholds by radiologists varied among different anatomical structures.

Project description:PurposeTo investigate the feasibility of using a deep learning-based approach to detect an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear within the knee joint at MRI by using arthroscopy as the reference standard.Materials and methodsA fully automated deep learning-based diagnosis system was developed by using two deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to isolate the ACL on MR images followed by a classification CNN to detect structural abnormalities within the isolated ligament. With institutional review board approval, sagittal proton density-weighted and fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images of the knee in 175 subjects with a full-thickness ACL tear (98 male subjects and 77 female subjects; average age, 27.5 years) and 175 subjects with an intact ACL (100 male subjects and 75 female subjects; average age, 39.4 years) were retrospectively analyzed by using the deep learning approach. Sensitivity and specificity of the ACL tear detection system and five clinical radiologists for detecting an ACL tear were determined by using arthroscopic results as the reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and two-sided exact binomial tests were used to further assess diagnostic performance.ResultsThe sensitivity and specificity of the ACL tear detection system at the optimal threshold were 0.96 and 0.96, respectively. In comparison, the sensitivity of the clinical radiologists ranged between 0.96 and 0.98, while the specificity ranged between 0.90 and 0.98. There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic performance between the ACL tear detection system and clinical radiologists at P < .05. The area under the ROC curve for the ACL tear detection system was 0.98, indicating high overall diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionThere was no significant difference between the diagnostic performance of the ACL tear detection system and clinical radiologists for determining the presence or absence of an ACL tear at MRI.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article.

Dataset Information

Fully automated segmentation of the pons and midbrain using human T1 MR brain images.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Fully automated segmentation of the pons and midbrain using human T1 MR brain images.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets