Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of therapies for acute ischemic stroke in China: a network meta-analysis of 13289 patients from 145 randomized controlled trials.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Many of these therapies have been compared against placebos, but have not been directly compared against each other. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of several commonly used drugs for AIS directly or indirectly.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to April 2013 for AIS therapies. The primary outcome measures were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and the clinical effective rate. A fixed-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression are performed; lastly, performed a mixed treatment comparison was performed through the Bayesian methods.

Results

Outcome of efficacy of therapies for acute ischemic stroke are as followed: All of the therapies mentioned above yielded results a more effective result than placebo, Sodium ozagrel (RR 3.86, 95%CI 3.18-4.61); Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (RR 9.60, 95%CI 7.04-13.06); Edaravone (RR 4.07, 95%CI 3.30-5.01); Edaravone + Kininogenase (RR 15.33, 95%CI 10.03-23.05). The significant difference in efficacy between edaravone monotherapy and Sodium ozagrel + edaravone was evident (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.08-0.61) and was also significant between efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel (RR 4.00, 95%CI 2.47-6.24). The differences between the risk and benefit were not significant when comparing Sodium ozagrel and edaravone or edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone for AIS. Outcome of the defect of neurological function: Placebo served a significant difference in treating the defects of neurological function compared with Sodium ozagrel (WMD?=?-3.11, 95%CI -4.43 to -1.79), Sodium ozagrel + edaravone (WMD?=?-6.25, 95%CI -7.96 to -4.54) and Edaravone + Kininogenase (WMD?=? -3.47, 95%CI -5.73 to -1.21).

Conclusions

It provides that the efficacy of edaravone monotherapy in treatment was not more effective than Sodium ozagrel + edaravone.The efficacy of edaravone + Kininogenase monotherapy in treatment was more effective than Sodium ozagrel. Edaravone + Kininogenase and Sodium ozagrel + Edaravone appeared the most effective treatments. And Sodium ozagrel, Sodium ozagrel + edaravone, Edaravone + Kininogenase can improve the nerve dysfunction.

SUBMITTER: Yang B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3923787 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of therapies for acute ischemic stroke in China: a network meta-analysis of 13289 patients from 145 randomized controlled trials.

Yang Bowen B Shi Jingpu J Chen Xin X Ma Bing B Sun Hao H

PloS one 20140213 2

<h4>Background</h4>Many of these therapies have been compared against placebos, but have not been directly compared against each other. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of several commonly used drugs for AIS directly or indirectly.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to April 2013 for AIS therapies. The primary outcome measures were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and the clin ...[more]

PMID: 24551100

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in neurological diseases. Numerous studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of ischemic stroke therapies, but clinical data were largely inconsistent. Therefore, it is necessary to summarize and analyze the published clinical research data in the field. Objective: We aimed to perform an umbrella review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ischemic stroke therapies. Methods: We conducted a search for meta-analyses and systematic reviews on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science to address this issue. We examined neurological function deficit and cognitive function scores, quality of life, and activities of daily living as efficacy endpoints and the incidence of adverse events as safety profiles. Results: Forty-three eligible studies including 377 studies were included in the umbrella review. The results showed that thrombolytic therapy (tPA; alteplase, tenecteplase, and desmoteplase), mechanical thrombectomy (MTE), edaravone with tPA, stem cell-based therapies, stent retrievers, acupuncture with Western medicines, autologous bone marrow stromal cells, antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, and tirofiban), statins, and Western medicines with blood-activating and stasis-dispelling herbs (NaoShuanTong capsule, Ginkgo biloba, Tongqiao Huoxue Decoction, Xuesaitong injection) can improve the neurological deficits and activities of daily living, and the adverse effects were mild for the treatment of ischemic stroke. Moreover, ligustrazine, safflower yellow, statins, albumin, colchicine, MLC601, salvianolic acids, and DL-3-n-butylphthalide showed serious adverse events, intracranial hemorrhage, or mortality in ischemic stroke patients. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that tPA, edaravone and tPA, tPA and MTE, acupuncture and Western medicines, and blood-activating and stasis-dispelling herbs with Western medicines are the optimum neurological function and activities of daily living medication for patients with ischemic stroke. Systematic Review Registration: https://inplasy.com/, identifier [INPLASY202250145].

Project description:BackgroundAcute ischemic stroke (AIS) is characterized by high morbidity, disability, mortality, recurrence, and economic burden. Clinical trials have demonstrated that the clinical efficacy of combining oral Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) with chemical drugs (CDs) is better than that of CDs alone. In this study, we performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs to assess the efficacy of different CPMs in combination with CDs in the treatment of AIS.MethodsSearch 6 databases from the beginning to January 10, 2023. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. The NMA was then performed using the STATA 13.0 program. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability values were applied to rank the studied treatments, and cluster analysis was used to compare the effects of CPMs between 2 different outcomes.ResultsA total of 94 eligible RCTs, involving 9581 participants, were included in this analysis. Nine CPMs, including Nao-mai-li granule (NML), Nao-mai-tai granule (NMT), Qi-long granule (QL), Long-sheng-zhi capsule (LSZ), Nao-xin-tong capsule (NXT), Nao-xue-shu oral liquid (NXS), Tong-xin-luo capsule (TXL), Xiao-shuan-chang-rong capsule (XSCR), and Xue-shuan-xin-mai-ning capsule (XSXMN) were included. Regarding the clinical effective rate, all types of CPMs + CDs treatments were significantly better than CDs treatments alone, with significant differences among the 9 selected CPMs. Compared with CDs, results showed that NXS + CDs performed best in improving clinical effective rate [OR = 4.73; 95% CI: 1.26-17.78; (SUCRA: 76.1%)]. TXL + CDs showed the most effective effect in alleviating National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [MD = -3.84; 95% CI: -5.23, -2.45; (SUCRA: 81.6%)]; NXT + CDs were most effective in improving Barthel index [MD = 13.05; 95% CI: 3.98-22.12; (SUCRA: 63.5%)]. Combined with other outcome indicators and the results of cluster analysis, NXS + CDs may assist in the potential optimal treatment regimen for AIS.ConclusionIn conclusion, CPMs were found to be beneficial as adjuvant therapy in patients with AIS. Taking into account the clinical effective rate and other outcomes, NXS + CDs may be the most effective option to improve the condition of AIS patients.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of therapies for acute ischemic stroke in China: a network meta-analysis of 13289 patients from 145 randomized controlled trials.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Efficacy and safety of therapies for acute ischemic stroke in China: a network meta-analysis of 13289 patients from 145 randomized controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets