Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Evaluation of the effectiveness of semen storage and sperm purification methods for spermatozoa transcript profiling.


ABSTRACT: Different semen storage and sperm purification methods may affect the integrity of isolated spermatozoal RNA. RNA-Seq was applied to determine whether semen storage methods (pelleted vs. liquefied) and somatic cell lysis buffer (SCLB) vs. PureSperm (PS) purification methods affect the quantity and quality of sperm RNA. The results indicate that the method of semen storage does not markedly impact RNA profiling whereas the choice of purification can yield significant differences. RNA-Seq showed that the majority of mitochondrial and mid-piece associated transcripts were lost after SCLB purification, which indicated that the mid-piece of spermatozoa may have been compromised. In addition, the number of stable transcript pairs from SCLB-samples was less than that from the PS samples. This study supports the view that PS purification better maintains the integrity of spermatozoal RNAs.

SUBMITTER: Mao S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3927401 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Evaluation of the effectiveness of semen storage and sperm purification methods for spermatozoa transcript profiling.

Mao Shihong S   Goodrich Robert J RJ   Hauser Russ R   Schrader Steven M SM   Chen Zhen Z   Krawetz Stephen A SA  

Systems biology in reproductive medicine 20130719 5


Different semen storage and sperm purification methods may affect the integrity of isolated spermatozoal RNA. RNA-Seq was applied to determine whether semen storage methods (pelleted vs. liquefied) and somatic cell lysis buffer (SCLB) vs. PureSperm (PS) purification methods affect the quantity and quality of sperm RNA. The results indicate that the method of semen storage does not markedly impact RNA profiling whereas the choice of purification can yield significant differences. RNA-Seq showed t  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2013-12-09 | GSE43586 | GEO
2013-12-09 | E-GEOD-43586 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC2785878 | biostudies-literature
| PRJEB37561 | ENA
| S-EPMC7142635 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5570286 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6791940 | biostudies-literature
| PRJEB10940 | ENA
| S-EPMC4737001 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8145398 | biostudies-literature