Dataset Information

Multi-planar dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound assessment of blood flow in a rabbit model of testicular torsion.

ABSTRACT: To assess correlation between multi-planar, dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) blood flow measurements and radiolabeled microsphere blood flow measurements, five groups of six rabbits underwent unilateral testicular torsion of 0°, 180°, 360°, 540° or 720°. Five US measurements per testis (three transverse/two longitudinal) were obtained pre-operatively and immediately and 4 and 8 h post-operatively using linear transducers (7-4 MHz/center frequency 4.5 MHz/10 rabbits; 9-3 MHz/center frequency 5.5 MHz/20 rabbits). Björck's linear least-squares method fit the rise phase of mean pixel intensity over a 7-s period for each time curve. Slope of fit and intervention/control US pixel intensity ratios were calculated. Means of transverse, longitudinal and combined transverse/longitudinal US ratios as a function of torsion degree were compared with radiolabeled microsphere ratios using Pearson's correlation coefficient, ?. There was high correlation between the two sets of ratios (? ? 0.88, p ? 0.05), except for the transverse US ratio in the immediate post-operative period (? = 0.79, p = 0.11). These results hold promise for future clinical applications.

SUBMITTER: Paltiel HJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3961143 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Multi-planar dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound assessment of blood flow in a rabbit model of testicular torsion.

Paltiel Harriet J HJ Estrada Carlos R CR Alomari Ahmad I AI Stamoulis Catherine C Passerotti Carlo C CC Meral F Can FC Lee Richard S RS Clement Gregory T GT

Ultrasound in medicine & biology 20131101 2

To assess correlation between multi-planar, dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) blood flow measurements and radiolabeled microsphere blood flow measurements, five groups of six rabbits underwent unilateral testicular torsion of 0°, 180°, 360°, 540° or 720°. Five US measurements per testis (three transverse/two longitudinal) were obtained pre-operatively and immediately and 4 and 8 h post-operatively using linear transducers (7-4 MHz/center frequency 4.5 MHz/10 rabbits; 9-3 MHz/center frequ ...[more]

PMID: 24188690

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR lymphangiography has recently emerged as a technique to image the lymphatic anatomy and identify lymphatic flow abnormalities; however, a method to quantify lymphatic flow in health and disease is needed. Purpose To develop a method to quantify thoracic lymphatic flow patterns using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography. Materials and Methods The following patients with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography images collected in 2015 and 2016 were retrospectively identified: group A, neonates with chylothorax; group B, children with heart failure complicated by plastic bronchitis; and group C, adults with lymphatic plastic bronchitis and without heart failure. An automated image segmentation method was developed for segmenting the contrast-enhanced lymphatic flow in spatiotemporal domains from the dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography images. The lymphatic flow rates were quantified for individual patients on the basis of their spatiotemporal dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiography segmentation results, and the flow rates were compared among the three patient groups by using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results Twenty-two patients were evaluated: seven neonates (mean age, 49 days ± 71 [standard deviation]; three boys, four girls), 10 children (mean age, 8 years ± 3; seven boys, three girls), and five adults (mean age, 46 years ± 10; three men, two women). The proposed method was used to obtain lymphatic flow segmentation results with Dice scores of 0.80, 0.82, and 0.83 for patients from groups A, B, and C, respectively. The mean flow rates for groups A, B, and C were 1.8 mL/min ± 1.4, 4.0 mL/min ± 1.8, and 12.5 mL/min ± 3.8, respectively. The flow rate differed significantly between groups A and B (P = .002), groups A and C (P = .01), and groups B and C (P = .01). Conclusion An automatic spatiotemporal segmentation method was used to determine thoracic lymphatic flow rates in individual patients based on their dynamic contrast-enhanced MR lymphangiographic images. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Project description:BackgroundThe aim of modern medicine is to safely classify diseases for successful therapy without invasive measures. Sonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are potent imaging techniques. However, without contrast medium, the informative value of the 3 native methods is limited. The advantages of sonography are: no radiation exposure or previously known physically harmful interactions with tissue, proportionate disappearance of a contrast agent risk, no (probably irreversible) contrast agent deposits, and no risk of renal insufficiency. But, is that enough to compete with of even exceed CT and MRI?SummaryIn this review, the state of the art of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the abdominal cavity is presented. The remarkable diagnostic possibilities can unfortunately only be demonstrated here in a small number of impressive, typical case studies underpinned by the literature, so that, from one's own perspective, the full spectrum of CEUS can be used by oneself or initiated. Within the limits of physics, the real-time dynamics of CEUS enable conclusions to be drawn, so that with the current technology, sonography, including expansion by contrast, can be considered superior to other imaging methods. It is not uncommon for CEUS to have the value of a control and reference method.Key messagesSonography very often enables reliable diagnostics. The introduction of a contrast agent in sonography has led to a quantum leap similar to that of other imaging techniques. Already natively, the real-time representation of dynamic events leads to a certain superiority, i.e., complete observation of the inflow and outflow phases of the contrast medium and the resulting diagnostic; tissue-specific differentiation options provide a unique selling point. Further advantages of the first-choice imaging diagnostic method are: a lack of radiation exposure, repeatability of the examination at any time, local independence, a negligible allergy rate compared to the contrast agents of other methods, and a lack of kidney and thyroid exposure or excluded deposits.

Project description:PurposeContrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging has expanded the diagnostic potential of ultrasound by enabling real-time imaging and quantification of tissue perfusion. Several perfusion models and curve fitting methods have been developed to quantify the temporal behavior of tracer signal and standardize perfusion quantification. While the least-squares approach has traditionally been applied for curve fitting, it can be inadequate for noisy and complex data. Moreover, previous research suggests that certain perfusion models may be more relevant depending on the organ or tissue imaged. We propose a multi-model framework to select the most appropriate perfusion model and curve fitting method for each diagnostic application.MethodsOur multi-model approach uses a system identification method, which estimates perfusion parameters from the model with the best fit to a given time-intensity curve. We compared current perfusion quantification methods that use a single perfusion model and curve fitting method and our proposed multi-model framework on bolus 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) in vivo images obtained in mice implanted with a colon cancer, as well as on simulation data. The quality of fit in estimating perfusion parameters was evaluated using the Spearman correlation coefficient, the coefficient of determination (R2 ), and the normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) to ensure that the multi-model framework finds the best perfusion model and curve fitting algorithm.ResultsOur multi-model framework outperforms conventional single perfusion model approaches with least-squares optimization, providing more robust perfusion parameter estimation. R2 and NRMSE are 0.98 and 0.18, respectively, for our proposed method. By comparison, the performance of the traditional approach is much more dependent upon the selection of the appropriate model. The R2 and NRMSE are 0.91 and 0.31, respectively.ConclusionsThe proposed multi-model framework for perfusion modeling outperforms the current approach of single perfusion modeling using least-squares optimization and more robustly estimates perfusion parameters when using empiric data labeled by an expert as the gold standard. Our technique is minimally sensitive to issues affecting the accuracy of perfusion parameter estimation, including rise time, noise, region of interest size, and frame rate. This framework could be of key utility in modeling different perfusion systems in different tissues and organs.

Dataset Information

Multi-planar dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound assessment of blood flow in a rabbit model of testicular torsion.

Publications

Multi-planar dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound assessment of blood flow in a rabbit model of testicular torsion.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure