Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Inter-method reliability of paper surveys and computer assisted telephone interviews in a randomized controlled trial of yoga for low back pain.


ABSTRACT: Little is known about the reliability of different methods of survey administration in low back pain trials. This analysis was designed to determine the reliability of responses to self-administered paper surveys compared to computer assisted telephone interviews (CATI) for the primary outcomes of pain intensity and back-related function, and secondary outcomes of patient satisfaction, SF-36, and global improvement among participants enrolled in a study of yoga for chronic low back pain.Pain intensity, back-related function, and both physical and mental health components of the SF-36 showed excellent reliability at all three time points; ICC scores ranged from 0.82 to 0.98. Pain medication use showed good reliability; kappa statistics ranged from 0.68 to 0.78. Patient satisfaction had moderate to excellent reliability; ICC scores ranged from 0.40 to 0.86. Global improvement showed poor reliability at 6 weeks (ICC?=?0.24) and 12 weeks (ICC?=?0.10).CATI shows excellent reliability for primary outcomes and at least some secondary outcomes when compared to self-administered paper surveys in a low back pain yoga trial. Having two reliable options for data collection may be helpful to increase response rates for core outcomes in back pain trials.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01761617. Date of trial registration: December 4, 2012.

SUBMITTER: Cerrada CJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3986430 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Inter-method reliability of paper surveys and computer assisted telephone interviews in a randomized controlled trial of yoga for low back pain.

Cerrada Christian J CJ   Weinberg Janice J   Sherman Karen J KJ   Saper Robert B RB  

BMC research notes 20140409


<h4>Background</h4>Little is known about the reliability of different methods of survey administration in low back pain trials. This analysis was designed to determine the reliability of responses to self-administered paper surveys compared to computer assisted telephone interviews (CATI) for the primary outcomes of pain intensity and back-related function, and secondary outcomes of patient satisfaction, SF-36, and global improvement among participants enrolled in a study of yoga for chronic low  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6457489 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6353544 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7590789 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3529418 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5294833 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7318309 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2720399 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3652191 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2806918 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4213548 | biostudies-literature