Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Validity of cardiovascular risk prediction models in kidney transplant recipients.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Predicting cardiovascular risk is of great interest in renal transplant recipients since cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to assess the validity of cardiovascular risk prediction models in this population. METHODS: Five databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and Web of Science) and cohort studies with at least one year of follow-up were included. Variables that described population characteristics, study design, and prognostic performance were extracted. The Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to evaluate bias. RESULTS: Seven studies met the criteria for inclusion, of which, five investigated the Framingham risk score and three used a transplant-specific model. Sample sizes ranged from 344 to 23,575, and three studies lacked sufficient event rates to confidently reach conclusion. Four studies reported discrimination (as measured by c-statistic), which ranged from 0.701 to 0.75, while only one risk model was both internally and externally validated. CONCLUSION: The Framingham has underestimated cardiovascular events in renal transplant recipients, but these studies have not been robust. A risk prediction model has been externally validated at least on one occasion, but comprehensive validation in multiple cohorts and impact analysis are recommended before widespread clinical application is advocated.

SUBMITTER: Mansell H 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3996891 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Validity of cardiovascular risk prediction models in kidney transplant recipients.

Mansell Holly H   Stewart Samuel Alan SA   Shoker Ahmed A  

TheScientificWorldJournal 20140408


<h4>Background</h4>Predicting cardiovascular risk is of great interest in renal transplant recipients since cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality.<h4>Objective</h4>To conduct a systematic review to assess the validity of cardiovascular risk prediction models in this population.<h4>Methods</h4>Five databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and Web of Science) and cohort studies with at least one year of follow-up were included. Variables that described populatio  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9285727 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7729246 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6482292 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4033372 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3424309 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4982810 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6777589 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7249550 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2709516 | biostudies-literature