Dataset Information

Multivariate prognostic factors analysis for second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The role of second-line chemotherapy (CT) is not established in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). We investigated the outcome of aBTC patients treated with second-line CT and devised a prognostic model.

Methods

Baseline clinical and laboratory data of 300 consecutive aBTC patients were collected and association with overall survival (OS) was investigated by multivariable Cox models.

Results

The following parameters resulted independently associated with longer OS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (P<0.001; hazard ratio (HR), 0.348; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.215-0.562), CA19.9 lower than median (P=0.013; HR, 0.574; 95% CI 0.370-0.891), progression-free survival after first-line CT ? 6 months (P=0.027; HR, 0.633; 95% CI 0.422-0.949) and previous surgery on primary tumour (P=0.027; HR, 0.609; 95% CI 0.392-0.945). We grouped the 249 patients with complete data available into three categories according to the number of fulfilled risk factors: median OS times for good-risk (zero to one factors), intermediate-risk (two factors) and poor-risk (three to four factors) groups were 13.1, 6.6 and 3.7 months, respectively (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Easily available clinical and laboratory factors predict prognosis of aBTC patients undergoing second-line CT. This model allows individual patient-risk stratification and may help in treatment decision and trial design.

SUBMITTER: Fornaro L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4007244 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Multivariate prognostic factors analysis for second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer.

Fornaro L L Cereda S S Aprile G G Di Girolamo S S Santini D D Silvestris N N Lonardi S S Leone F F Milella M M Vivaldi C C Belli C C Bergamo F F Lutrino S E SE Filippi R R Russano M M Vaccaro V V Brunetti A E AE Rotella V V Falcone A A Barbera M A MA Corbelli J J Fasola G G Aglietta M M Zagonel V V Reni M M Vasile E E Brandi G G

British journal of cancer 20140408 9

<h4>Background</h4>The role of second-line chemotherapy (CT) is not established in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). We investigated the outcome of aBTC patients treated with second-line CT and devised a prognostic model.<h4>Methods</h4>Baseline clinical and laboratory data of 300 consecutive aBTC patients were collected and association with overall survival (OS) was investigated by multivariable Cox models.<h4>Results</h4>The following parameters resulted independently associated with longe ...[more]

PMID: 24714745

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAdvanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has a poor prognosis. Gemcitabine with platinum chemotherapy was the standard first-line chemotherapeutic regimen until the recent addition of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. After disease progression, the only second-line chemotherapy that has demonstrated a survival benefit versus supportive care is FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin), with a modest benefit. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of second-line FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) combined with bevacizumab for advanced BTC.MethodsThis single-center retrospective study enrolled patients with metastatic BTC (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [ICC], extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [ECC], or gallbladder carcinoma) that progressed after first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. FOLFIRI-bevacizumab was administered intravenously every 2 weeks [folinic acid 200 mg/m², fluorouracil 400 mg/m² (bolus), fluorouracil 2400 mg/m² (46-h continuous intravenous infusion), irinotecan 180 mg/m², and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg] until unacceptable toxicity, patient refusal, or disease progression.ResultsOverall, 28 patients received the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab regimen after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.0 months (95% CI 6.4-16.5). The OS rate was 39.3% (95% CI 24.8-62.3) and 10.7% (95% CI 3.7-32.1) at 12- and 24-months respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.2 months (95% CI 3.1-10.2) with FOLFIRI-bevacizumab. The PFS rates at 12 months and 24 months were 17.9% (95% CI 8.19-39.5] and 10.7% (95% CI 3.7-31.2), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) to FOLFIRI-bevacizumab was 23.1%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 69.3%. Grade 3-4 adverse events (sAE) were reported in 20 patients (71.4%) treated with FOLFIRI-bevacizumab.ConclusionFOLFIRI-bevacizumab as a second-line treatment for advanced BTC after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy showed efficacy and safety with a promising tumor response rate in this retrospective single-center study.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with advanced biliary tract cancer who progress on first-line therapy have limited treatment options. The TreeTopp study assessed varlitinib, a reversible small molecule pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, plus capecitabine in previously treated advanced biliary tract cancer.Patients and methodsThis global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study enrolled patients with confirmed unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer and disease progression after one prior line of gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy. Patients received oral varlitinib 300 mg or placebo twice daily (b.i.d.) for 21 days, plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1-14, in 21-day treatment cycles. Co-primary endpoints were objective response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST v1.1 by Independent Central Review.ResultsIn total, 127 patients received varlitinib plus capecitabine (n = 64) or placebo plus capecitabine (n = 63). The objective response rate was 9.4% with varlitinib plus capecitabine versus 4.8% with capecitabine alone (odds ratio 2.28; P = 0.42). Median PFS was 2.83 versus 2.79 months [hazard ratio (HR), 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-1.37; P = 0.63] and overall survival was 7.8 versus 7.5 months (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69-1.79; P = 0.66), respectively. In a subgroup analysis, the addition of varlitinib appeared to provide a PFS benefit in female patients (median, 4.1 versus 2.8 months; HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.28-1.23) and those with gallbladder cancer (median, 2.9 versus 1.6 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.26-1.19). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 65.6% of patients receiving varlitinib plus capecitabine versus 58.7% of those receiving capecitabine alone.ConclusionsIn patients with advanced biliary tract cancer, second-line treatment with varlitinib plus capecitabine was well tolerated but did not improve efficacy versus capecitabine alone. A PFS benefit was suggested in female patients and those with gallbladder cancer.

Project description:Background: Sarcopenia, systemic inflammation, and low muscularity significantly impact the survival of cancer patients. However, few studies have investigated how sarcopenia and systemic inflammation affect the prognosis of biliary tract cancer with distant metastasis. In this study, we investigated the association between sarcopenia with systemic inflammation and prognosis of metastatic biliary tract cancer. Materials and Methods: Data collected from 353 metastatic biliary tract cancer patients from 2007 to 2016 were analyzed. To evaluate the skeletal muscle mass, computed tomography images at the upper level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) were used. Sarcopenia was defined using the Japan Society of Hepatology guideline; L3 muscle index <42 cm2/m2 for male and <38 cm2/m2 for female patients. Systemic inflammation was evaluated using the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Patients with NLR > 3 were categorized into the inflammatory category. The overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed on those who received gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy and depending on the presence of sarcopenia and inflammation. Results: Patients with sarcopenia showed lesser 1-year OS than those without (25.5 vs. 38.2%, p = 0.019). The patients with high NLR (NLR > 3) were associated with a shorter OS than were those with a low NLR (NLR ≤ 3) (21.0 vs. 52.8%, p < 0.001). Based on these results, we categorized the patients into three groups; sarcopenia accompanied by high NLR, no sarcopenia and low NLR, and either sarcopenia or high NLR. The OS of patients was well-stratified according to this grouping (1-year OS; 18.3 vs. 30.3 vs. 55.8%, p < 0.001). Concordant with OS results, the PFS was well-stratified based on the presence of either sarcopenia or high NLR (Sarcopenia; 9.5 vs. 19.4%, p < 0.001, NLR; 10.0 vs. 23.4%, p < 0.001). The PFS was significantly associated with high NLR and sarcopenia (1-year PFS; 7.8 vs. 13.0 vs. 27.9%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Sarcopenia with inflammation was associated with inferior OS and PFS. In addition, sarcopenia accompanied by inflammation was associated with poor prognosis. Conservative treatments such as nutritional support, exercise, and pharmacologic intervention could help metastatic biliary tract cancer patients to overcome sarcopenia and the inflammatory status.

Project description:Background & aimsAdvanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC) is associated with a poor prognosis. Real-world data on the outcome of patients with ABTC undergoing sequential chemotherapies remain scarce, and little is known about treatment options beyond the established first- and second-line treatments with gemcitabine + cisplatin and FOLFOX. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients with regard to different oncological therapies and to identify prognostic factors.MethodsFrom January 2010 until December 2019, 142 patients started palliative chemotherapy at our tertiary care liver center. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier plots. Prognostic factors were evaluated using cox proportional-hazards.ResultsPatients received a median number of 2 lines of chemotherapy. Median OS was 6.7, 15.2 and 18.2 months for patients who received 1, 2 and 3 lines of chemotherapy, respectively. Patients treated with FOLFIRINOX had a significantly extended OS of 23.8 months (log-rank test: p = 0.018). The univariate cox regression analysis identified several clinical parameters associated with survival (e.g. albumin, bilirubin, carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels).ConclusionsOur study provides real-world data on the prognosis of ABTC including survival times for patients receiving third and later lines of chemotherapy.Lay summaryReal-world data depicting the outcome of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer outside the framework of controlled trials remain rare despite being extremely important for clinical decision-making. This study therefore provides important real-world data on the established first- and second-line treatments with gemcitabine + cisplatin and FOLFOX, as well as on other chemotherapy regimens or later lines of chemotherapy. It further demonstrates that the use of FOLFIRINOX is associated with promising survival and that there is an association between various clinical parameters such as pre-therapeutic albumin, bilirubin or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels and survival.

Project description:Background: Pembrolizumab is a potentially valuable treatment. However, patients, doctors, and healthcare decision-makers are uncertain about its cost-effectiveness and an appropriate pricing for this new therapy. This study aims to appraise the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients in China and the United States (US). Methods: A Markov model was constructed from the perspectives of healthcare systems in both China and the US for pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Patient baseline characteristics and key clinical data were sourced from the KEYNOTE-966 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04003636). Costs and utilities were collected from drug cost websites and published literature. Cumulative costs (in USD), life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were measured and compared. Price simulations were conducted under given willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds to provide pricing scheme references. The model's robustness was analyzed through one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: Basic data analysis illustrates that pembrolizumab ($2662.41/100 mg) in combination with chemotherapy regimen was not cost-effective relative to chemotherapy regimens at the WTP threshold of $38,201.19 in China, and the additional cost relative to chemotherapy regimens was $77,114.94 (ICER $556,689.47/QALY) while increasing 0.14 QALYs. Pembrolizumab ($54.71/1 mg) also increased efficacy by 0.14 QALYs in the US, but remained also not cost-effective at the US WTP threshold of $229,044, and the total cost increased by $160,425.24 (ICER $1,109,462.92/QALY). Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy reduces the disease of burden. However, at its current price, it may not be a cost-effective treatment for advanced BTC in both China and the US. This study can aid decision-makers in making optimal choices.

Dataset Information

Multivariate prognostic factors analysis for second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Multivariate prognostic factors analysis for second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets