Dataset Information

Evidence of GnRH antagonist escape in obese women.

ABSTRACT: Assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle cancelation rates are increased among overweight and obese women; however, the reasons for this are not completely clear. Premature luteinization due to inadequate endogenous gonadotropin suppression is a possibility for this higher risk of cancellation.The objective of the study was to investigate the impact of female obesity on the pharmacokinetics of cetrorelix (GnRH antagonist).This was an interventional study.The study was conducted at a university clinical and translational research center.Regularly menstruating obese (n = 10) and normal-weight (n = 10) women participated in the study.A frequent blood sampling study was performed after a GnRH antagonist was administered, followed by recombinant LH.Pharmacokinetics of cetrorelix in obese vs normal weight women were measured.Five of the obese women (50%) and none of the normal-weight women had a rebound of LH (defined as >50% increase in LH level from nadir) over the 14-hour postdose observation period. The obese group had a significantly decreased distributional half-life of cetrorelix compared with the normal-weight group (8.1 ± 1.6 vs 12.7 ± 6.2 hours, P = .02). The obese group exhibited increased clearance of cetrorelix compared with the normal-weight group (25.8 ± 6.8 vs 20.1 ± 8.3 L/h, P = .058).The altered pharmacokinetics of cetrorelix in obese women may lead to premature ovulation during ART, and this could be one of the mechanisms that results in increased cycle cancelation in this group of women. In accordance with the higher gonadotropin requirements for obese women undergoing ART, weight-based dosing of GnRH antagonists may be required.

SUBMITTER: Roth LW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4010706 | biostudies-literature | 2014 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evidence of GnRH antagonist escape in obese women.

Roth Lauren W LW Bradshaw-Pierce Erica L EL Allshouse Amanda A AA Lesh Jennifer J Chosich Justin J Bradford Andrew P AP Polotsky Alex J AJ Santoro Nanette N

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 20140320 5

<h4>Context</h4>Assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle cancelation rates are increased among overweight and obese women; however, the reasons for this are not completely clear. Premature luteinization due to inadequate endogenous gonadotropin suppression is a possibility for this higher risk of cancellation.<h4>Objective</h4>The objective of the study was to investigate the impact of female obesity on the pharmacokinetics of cetrorelix (GnRH antagonist).<h4>Design</h4>This was an intervent ...[more]

PMID: 24650013

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundA consensus has been reached on the preferred primary outcome of all infertility treatment trials, which is the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). Some recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies have compared the effectiveness of GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols but showed inconsistent results. Studies commonly used conservative estimates and optimal estimates to described the CLBR of one incomplete assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle and there are not many previous studies with data of the complete cycle to compare CLBRs in GnRH-antagonist versus GnRH-agonist protocols.MethodsA total of 18,853 patients have completed their first IVF cycle including fresh and subsequent frozen-thawed cycles during 2016-2019, 16,827 patients were treated with GnRH-a long and 2026 patients with GnRH-ant protocol. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to evaluate the difference of GnRH-a and GnRH-ant protocol in relation to CLBR. Utilized Propensity Score Matching(PSM) for sampling by up to 1:1 nearest neighbor matching to adjust the numerical difference and balance the confounders between groups.ResultsBefore PSM, significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics and the CLBR was 50.91% in the GnRH-a and 33.42% in the GnRH-ant (OR = 2.07; 95%CI: 1.88-2.28; P < 0.001). Stratified analysis showed the CLBR of GnRH-ant was lower than GnRH-a in suboptimal responders(46.89 vs 27.42%, OR = 2.34, 95%CI = 1.99-2.74; P < 0.001) and no differences of CLBR were observed in other patients between protocols. After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariable logistic analysis found the CLBR of GnRH-ant group was lower than that of GnRH-a group (OR = 2.11, 95%CI:1.69-2.63, P < 0.001). After PSM balenced the confounders between groups, the CLBR of GnRH-a group was higher than that of GnRH-ant group in suboptimal responders((38.61 vs 28.22%, OR = 1.60, 95%CI = 1.28-1.99; P < 0.001) and the normal fertilization rate and number of available embryo in GnRH-a were higher than these of GnRH-ant groups in suboptimal responders (77.39 vs 75.22%; 2.86 ± 1.26 vs 2.61 ± 1.22; P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in other patients between different protocols.ConclusionsIt is crucial to optimize the utilization of protocols in different ovarian response patients and reconsider the field of application of GnRH-ant protocols in China.

Dataset Information

Evidence of GnRH antagonist escape in obese women.

Publications

Evidence of GnRH antagonist escape in obese women.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure