Dataset Information

Usefulness of cellular analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for predicting the etiology of pneumonia in critically ill patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The usefulness of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid cellular analysis in pneumonia has not been adequately evaluated. This study investigated the ability of cellular analysis of BAL fluid to differentially diagnose bacterial pneumonia from viral pneumonia in adult patients who are admitted to intensive care unit.

Methods

BAL fluid cellular analysis was evaluated in 47 adult patients who underwent bronchoscopic BAL following less than 24 hours of antimicrobial agent exposure. The abilities of BAL fluid total white blood cell (WBC) counts and differential cell counts to differentiate between bacterial and viral pneumonia were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Bacterial pneumonia (n=24) and viral pneumonia (n=23) were frequently associated with neutrophilic pleocytosis in BAL fluid. BAL fluid median total WBC count (2,815/µL vs. 300/µL, P<0.001) and percentage of neutrophils (80.5% vs. 54.0%, P=0.02) were significantly higher in the bacterial pneumonia group than in the viral pneumonia group. In ROC curve analysis, BAL fluid total WBC count showed the best discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.855 (95% CI, 0.750-0.960). BAL fluid total WBC count ? 510/µL had a sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 78.3%, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 3.83, and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0.21. When analyzed in combination with serum procalcitonin or C-reactive protein, sensitivity was 95.8%, specificity was 95.7%, PLR was 8.63, and NLR was 0.07. BAL fluid total WBC count ? 510/µL was an independent predictor of bacterial pneumonia with an adjusted odds ratio of 13.5 in multiple logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions

Cellular analysis of BAL fluid can aid early differential diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia from viral pneumonia in critically ill patients.

SUBMITTER: Choi SH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4019586 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Usefulness of cellular analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for predicting the etiology of pneumonia in critically ill patients.

Choi Sang-Ho SH Hong Sang-Bum SB Hong Hyo-Lim HL Kim Sung-Han SH Huh Jin Won JW Sung Heungsup H Lee Sang-Oh SO Kim Mi-Na MN Jeong Jin-Yong JY Lim Chae-Man CM Kim Yang Soo YS Woo Jun Hee JH Koh Younsuck Y

PloS one 20140513 5

<h4>Background</h4>The usefulness of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid cellular analysis in pneumonia has not been adequately evaluated. This study investigated the ability of cellular analysis of BAL fluid to differentially diagnose bacterial pneumonia from viral pneumonia in adult patients who are admitted to intensive care unit.<h4>Methods</h4>BAL fluid cellular analysis was evaluated in 47 adult patients who underwent bronchoscopic BAL following less than 24 hours of antimicrobial agent exp ...[more]

PMID: 24824328

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) versus conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) for pediatric pneumonia. Methods This retrospective observational study enrolled 103 children who were diagnosed with pneumonia and hospitalized at Hubei Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital between 15 October 2020 and 15 February 2022. The pneumonia diagnosis was based on clinical manifestations, lung imaging, and microbiological tests. Pathogens in the lower respiratory tract were detected using CMTs and BALF mNGS (of DNA and RNA). The diagnostic performance of BALF mNGS was compared with that of CMTs. Results In 96 patients, pathogens were identified by microbiological tests. The overall pathogen detection rate of mNGS was significantly higher than that of CMTs (91.3% vs. 59.2%, p = 0.000). The diagnostic performance of mNGS varied for different pathogens; however, its sensitivity and accuracy for diagnosing bacterial and viral infections were both higher than those of CMTs (p = 0.000). For the diagnosis of fungi, the sensitivity of mNGS (87.5%) was higher than that of CMTs (25%); however, its specificity and accuracy were lower than those of CMTs (p < 0.01). For the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, the specificity (98.8%) and accuracy (88.3%) of mNGS were high; however, its sensitivity (42.1%) was significantly lower than that of CMTs (100%) (p = 0.001). In 96 patients with definite pathogens, 52 cases (50.5%) were infected with a single pathogen, while 44 cases (42.7%) had polymicrobial infections. Virus–bacteria and virus–virus co-infections were the most common. Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, rhinovirus, cytomegalovirus, parainfluenza virus, and fungi were more likely to be associated with polymicrobial infections. Conclusions BALF mNGS improved the detection rate of pediatric pneumonia, especially in mixed infections. The diagnostic performance of BALF mNGS varies according to pathogen type. mNGS can be used to supplement CMTs. A combination of mNGS and CMTs may be the best diagnostic strategy.

Project description:BackgroundWhile Candida pneumonia is life-threatening, biomarker measurements to early detect suspected Candida pneumonia are lacking. This study compared the diagnostic values of measuring levels of (1, 3)-β-D-glucan in endotracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and serum to detect suspected Candida pneumonia in immunocompromised and critically ill patients.MethodsThis prospective, observational study enrolled immunocompromised, critically ill, and ventilated patients with suspected fungal pneumonia in mixed intensive care units from November 2010 to October 2011. Patients with D-glucan confounding factors or other fungal infection were excluded. Endotracheal aspirate, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum were collected from each patient to perform a fungal smear, culture, and D-glucan assay.ResultsAfter screening 166 patients, 31 patients completed the study and were categorized into non-Candida pneumonia/non-candidemia (n = 18), suspected Candida pneumonia (n = 9), and non-Candida pneumonia/candidemia groups (n = 4). D-glucan levels in endotracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage were highest in suspected Candida pneumonia, while the serum D-glucan level was highest in non-Candida pneumonia/candidemia. In all patients, the D-glucan value in endotracheal aspirate was positively correlated with that in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. For the detection of suspected Candida pneumonia, the predictive performance (sensitivity/specificity/D-glucan cutoff [pg/ml]) of D-glucan in endotracheal aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was 67%/82%/120 and 89%/86%/130, respectively, accounting for areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.833 and 0.939 (both P < 0.05), respectively. Measuring serum D-glucan was of no diagnostic value (area under curve =0.510, P = 0.931) for the detection of suspected Candida pneumonia in the absence of concurrent candidemia.ConclusionsD-glucan levels in both endotracheal aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage, but not in serum, provide good diagnostic values to detect suspected Candida pneumonia and to serve as potential biomarkers for early detection in this patient population.

Dataset Information

Usefulness of cellular analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for predicting the etiology of pneumonia in critically ill patients.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Usefulness of cellular analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for predicting the etiology of pneumonia in critically ill patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets