Dataset Information

Local versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR)--systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The hypothesis of this study was that local anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is not harmful in comparison to general anesthesia (GA) for patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVR).TAVR is a rapidly spreading treatment option for severe aortic valve stenosis. Traditionally, in most centers, this procedure is done under GA, but more recently procedures with MAC have been reported.

Methods

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing MAC versus GA in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. Trials were identified through a literature search covering publications from 1 January 2005 through 31 January 2013. The main outcomes of interest of this literature meta-analysis were 30-day overall mortality, cardiac-/procedure-related mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, sepsis, acute kidney injury, procedure time and duration of hospital stay. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Seven observational studies and a total of 1,542 patients were included in this analysis. None of the studies were randomized. Compared to GA, MAC was associated with a shorter hospital stay (-3.0 days (-5.0 to -1.0); P = 0.004) and a shorter procedure time (MD -36.3 minutes (-58.0 to -15.0 minutes); P <0.001). Overall 30-day mortality was not significantly different between MAC and GA (RR 0.77 (0.38 to 1.56); P = 0.460), also cardiac- and procedure-related mortality was similar between both groups (RR 0.90 (0.34 to 2.39); P = 0.830).

Conclusion

These data did not show a significant difference in short-term outcomes for MAC or GA in TAVR. MAC may be associated with reduced procedural time and shorter hospital stay. Now randomized trials are needed for further evaluation of MAC in the setting of TAVR.

SUBMITTER: Frohlich GM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4022332 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Local versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR)--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fröhlich Georg M GM Lansky Alexandra J AJ Webb John J Roffi Marco M Toggweiler Stefan S Reinthaler Markus M Wang Duolao D Hutchinson Nevil N Wendler Olaf O Hildick-Smith David D Meier Pascal P

BMC medicine 20140310

<h4>Background</h4>The hypothesis of this study was that local anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is not harmful in comparison to general anesthesia (GA) for patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVR).TAVR is a rapidly spreading treatment option for severe aortic valve stenosis. Traditionally, in most centers, this procedure is done under GA, but more recently procedures with MAC have been reported.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a systematic review and meta-analysis ...[more]

PMID: 24612945

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the potential favourable effects of local anaesthesia plus sedation (LAS) compared with general anaesthesia (GA) in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).MethodsElectronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and the reference lists of eligible publications were screened for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published between 1 January 2006 and 26 June 2016 that compare LAS to GA in an adult study population undergoing TAVI. We conducted study quality assessments using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and structured the review according to PRISMA. A meta-analysis calculating the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) under the assumption of a random-effects model was performed. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic and Cochran's Q-test.ResultsAfter database screening, one RCT and 19 observational studies were included in the review. We found no differences between LAS and GA in terms of 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality and other endpoints that addressed safety and complication rates. LAS was associated with a shorter ICU and hospital stay and with lower rates of catecholamine administration and red blood cell transfusion. New pacemaker implantations occurred more frequently under LAS. The overall conversion rate from LAS to GA was 6.2%.ConclusionFor TAVI, both LAS and GA are feasible and safe. LAS may have some benefits such as increased haemodynamic stability and shorter hospital and ICU stays, but it does not impact 30-day mortality. Since there is a paucity of randomised trial data and the findings are mainly based on observational study data, this review should be considered as a hypothesis-generating article for subsequent RCTs that are required to confirm the potential favourable effects we detected for LAS.Registration numberCRD42016048398 (PROSPERO).

Project description:ObjectiveTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures are increasing rapidly, but the durability of tissue valve and periprocedural complications are not satisfactory. Immune reaction to the galactose-α-1,3 galactose β-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine (α-Gal) and conventional processing protocols of cardiac xenografts lead to calcification. Next-generation TAVI needs to be made with α-Gal-free xenografts by multiple anticalcification therapies to avoid immune rejection and enhance durability, and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to improve the procedural safety.MethodsPorcine pericardia were decellularized and immunologically modified with α-galactosidase. The pericardia were treated by space filler, crosslinked with glutaraldehyde in organic solvent, and detoxified. The sheep-specific nitinol (nickel-titanium memory alloy) wire backbone was made from a 3D-printed model for ovine aortic root. After it passed the fitting test, we manufactured a self-expandable stented valve with the porcine pericardia mounted on the customized nitinol wire-based stent. After in vitro circulation using customized silicone aortic root, we performed TAVI in 9 sheep and obtained hemodynamic, radiological, immunohistopathological, and biochemical results.ResultsThe valve functioned well, with excellent stent fitting and good coronary flow under in vitro circulation. Sheep were sequentially scheduled to be humanely killed until 238 days after TAVI. Echocardiography and cardiac catheterization demonstrated good hemodynamic status and function of the aortic valve. The xenografts were well preserved without α-Gal immune reaction or calcification based on the immunological, radiographic, microscopic, and biochemical examinations.ConclusionsWe proved preclinical safety and efficacy for next-generation α-Gal-free TAVI with multiple anticalcification therapies and 3D-printing technology. A future clinical study is warranted based on these promising preclinical results.

Dataset Information

Local versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR)--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Local versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR)--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets