Dataset Information

Complications of treating terrible triad injury of the elbow: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Terrible triad injury of the elbow (TTIE), comprising elbow dislocation with radial head and coronoid process fracture, is notoriously challenging to treat and has typically been associated with complications and poor outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the most recent available evidence regarding functional outcomes and complications following surgical management of TTIE.

Methods

Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant studies, which were included if they were retrospective or prospective in design, involved participants who had TTIE, and were published in English. Outcomes of interest were functional outcomes and complications.

Results

Sixteen studies, involving 312 patients, were included in the systematic review. Mean follow up after surgery was typically 25 to 30 months. Mean Mayo elbow performance scores ranged from 78 to 95. Mean Broberg-Morrey scores ranged from 76 to 90. Mean DASH scores ranged from 9 to 31. The proportion of patients who required reoperation due to complications ranged from 0 to 54.5% (overall ?=?70/312 [22.4%]). Most of these complications were related to hardware fixation problems, joint stiffness, joint instability, and ulnar neuropathy. The most common complications that did not require reoperation were heterotopic ossification (39/312 [12.5%] patients) and arthrosis (35/312 [11.2%] patients).

Conclusions

The results of this systematic review indicate that functional outcomes after surgery for TTIE are generally satisfactory and that complications are common. Further research is warranted to determine which surgical techniques optimize functional outcomes and reduce the risk of complications.

SUBMITTER: Chen HW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4022574 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Complications of treating terrible triad injury of the elbow: a systematic review.

Chen Hong-wei HW Liu Guo-dong GD Wu Li-jun LJ

PloS one 20140515 5

<h4>Objective</h4>Terrible triad injury of the elbow (TTIE), comprising elbow dislocation with radial head and coronoid process fracture, is notoriously challenging to treat and has typically been associated with complications and poor outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the most recent available evidence regarding functional outcomes and complications following surgical management of TTIE.<h4>Methods</h4>Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were s ...[more]

PMID: 24832627

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background The terrible triad of the elbow (TTE) is a complex injury consisting of simultaneous elbow dislocation or subluxation, radial head fracture, and coronoid fracture. During the initial assessment of a TTE, the typical severity of presenting pain, swelling, and limited range of motion may limit the ability to perform a thorough physical examination and thus divert a clinician's attention away from additional injuries to the ipsilateral upper extremity. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to review the literature for reported cases of concomitant ipsilateral upper extremity injuries associated with a TTE and discuss various strategies to increase clinician awareness to avoid underdiagnosis and missed diagnoses. Methods A systematic review of five databases in four languages (English, Spanish, French, and Portuguese), from inception to May 2021, was conducted. Articles describing a TTE with a concomitant osseous, chondral, ligamentous, or musculotendinous injury occurring on the ipsilateral upper extremity were included. The patients were divided into two groups, those presenting with a classic TTE and concomitant ipsilateral upper extremity injury (group 1) and those in whom a TTE variant was described (group 2). A TTE variant was defined as a combination of osseous and/or chondral injuries to the elbow other than the classic description of TTE, in which at least two of the three classical elements of a TTE (elbow dislocation, coronoid fracture, and radial head fracture) were present in addition to other unique elbow osteoarticular injury. Results Nineteen articles met inclusion criteria and were further analyzed. A total of 27 patients were analyzed, 23 from group 1 and 4 from group 2. Overall, 33 concomitant injuries were documented in group 1, the most common being an olecranon fracture (27.3%), followed by Essex-Lopresti injury, triceps tendon avulsion, and carpal fracture-dislocation with 4 (12.1%) cases each. Group 2 had four patients, all of whom presented with a unique variant of the classically described TTE. Conclusion Despite a characteristic radiographic appearance of the classic TTE, additional injuries of the ipsilateral extremity or variants of the classic TTE may be easily missed, especially in cases resulting from high-energy mechanisms of injury. By analyzing the available data on associated injuries and variants that may occur with a TTE, we hope to increase awareness so that clinicians may recognize these less common but more complex injury patterns.

Project description:Introduction The terrible triad of the elbow (TTE) is a lesion associating a dislocation of the elbow, a fracture of the radial head, and a fracture of the coronoid process, with a high potential of complication. The treatment is based on the restoration of bone lesions and external capsular ligament repair. The systematic repair of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is still debated in the literature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and functional results of the surgical treatment in a real-world series from Easter Morocco. Patients and methods This was a retrospective study of 6 cases of TTE operated by isolated external approach or combined approach (internal or anterior) of the elbow in the department of Traumatology-Orthopedics of the Mohammed VI University Hospital (Oujda Morocco), over a period of 7 years from 2013 to 2020. Radial head and coronoid process fractures were classified according to the Mason and Morrey-Regan classifications, respectively. The following clinical parameters were evaluated: Mayo Clinic Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and arc of mobility in flexion-extension and prono-supination. Results 6 male patients treated between May 2013 and December 2020 were included. The median follow-up was 48 months. All patients had frontal and lateral standard X-ray of over and under joints, and computed tomography (CT)-scan was delivered for 5 cases. The elbow dislocation was posterolateral in five cases, and posteromedial in only one patient. Radial head fractures were classified as type I in one case, type II in two cases, and type III in three cases. Coronoid fractures were type I in three cases, type II in one case, and type III in two cases. At the last follow up, the mean MEPS, Quick DASH, and VAS was 81, 28, 0.8, respectively. The mean arc of mobility in flexion was 120° and it was deficient by 20° in extension. In addition, the mean arc of mobility in protonation was 80°, while in supination it was 75°. Regarding complications, we noticed an instability of the elbow on valgus in a single case, elbow stiffness with heterotopic ossification in a single case, ulnar nerve damage in a single case during medial collateral ligament anchoring, and elbow hygroma in one single case. Conclusion The surgical management of TTE can provide good and long-term functional results after restoration of the stabilization of bone structures and the lateral ligament complex, without the need to repair the medial collateral ligament. Highlights • The terrible triad of the elbow is a complex injury affecting both the bone and ligaments.• A complete and accurate management of this entity during any trauma of the elbow is required.• A careful clinical and radiological assessments must be performed during complex elbow trauma.• The main objective of any treatment is to provide a stable elbow and avoid early arthrosis.

Project description:BackgroundThe terrible triad injury (TTI) of the elbow is a combination of a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow joint combined with fractures of the radial head and coronoid process most often caused by a fall on an outstretched hand. The injury pattern was named for its poor outcomes and high complication rates following surgical repair, but increased understanding of elbow anatomy and biomechanics has led to the development of standardized surgical protocols in an attempt to improve outcomes. Most existing literature on terrible triad injuries is from small retrospective cohort studies and surgical techniques to improve outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the functional outcomes, prognosis, and complications following current surgical treatment of TTIs.MethodsA scoping review was performed to evaluate the literature. In total, 617 studies were identified and screened by 2 reviewers, with 43 studies included for qualitative analysis. These 43 studies underwent data extraction for functional outcomes using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (DASH) and were stratified accordingly. Secondary outcome measures assessed in the study were a range of motion (ROM) and complication rate.ResultsThe average MEPS was 90 (excellent) from a total of 37 studies with 1609 patients, and the average DASH score was 16 from 16 studies with 441 patients. Another 6 studies with a total of 127 patients reported a mean Q-DASH score of 13. A total of 39 studies consisting of 1637 patients had a mean forearm rotation of 135 degrees, and 36 studies consisting of 1606 patients had a mean flexion-extension arc of 113 degrees. Among the studies, there was a 30% complication rate with a need for revision surgery in 7.8% of cases. The most common complications were radiographic evidence of heterotopic ossification (11%) and ulnar nerve neuropathy (2.6%).Discussion/conclusionsThis study shows that current surgical treatment for terrible triad injuries has resulted in improved outcomes. Based on primary outcome measures using MEPS and DASH scores, almost all of the studies have highlighted good or excellent functional outcomes. This highlighted the marked improvement in outcome scores since the term was coined, suggesting that terrible triad injuries may no longer be so terrible.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:Several studies have been published regarding the treatment of medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) injuries for professional overhead athletes. However, there is a paucity of data regarding non-professional athletes. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the rate of outcome scores and complications of conservative versus operative treatments both in non-professional athletes and in non-sport-related trauma patients with MUCL lesions. METHODS:A systematic review of the published literature was performed by applying the PRISMA guidelines. A search was conducted using three databases: Medline, Science Direct, and Web of Science. The keywords used were "ulnar collateral ligament injury," "elbow," "surgery," and "conservative treatment". Patients were divided into three groups: patients who underwent conservative treatment (C-group), surgical treatment (S-group), and surgery after a failed conservative treatment (C&S-group). Clinical outcomes were analyzed: Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Conway scale, Carson score, and Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score (KJOC). RESULTS:A total of 15 studies were included, evaluating 513 patients. Although good and excellent outcomes were found for most patients during daily and/or sport activities, independently of the type of treatment, the C-group had better results. Excellent results were found in 98.8% of the C-group, in 88.1% of the S-group, and in 87.7% of the C&S-group. The complication rate in the C-group was statistically higher compared to the S and C&S groups (P < 0.001). However, its complication rate was higher with lower patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS:There is insufficient evidence to establish statistically significant differences in the effects of conservative versus surgical treatments on the functional outcomes of patients with MUCL lesions. However, a period of rehabilitation therapy and the functional request of the single injured subject are useful to discern which patients genuinely require MUCL surgical repair.

Project description:ObjectiveNonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), the deliberate, self-inflicted damage of bodily tissue without the intent to die, is associated with various negative outcomes. Although basic and epidemiologic research on NSSI has increased during the last 2 decades, literature on effective interventions targeting NSSI is still emerging. Here, we present a comprehensive, systematic review of existing psychological and pharmacological treatments designed specifically for NSSI, or including outcome assessments examining change in NSSI.MethodWe conducted a systematic search of PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and ERIC databases to retrieve relevant articles that met inclusion criteria; specifically, uncontrolled and controlled trials that 1) presented quantitative outcome data on NSSI, and 2) clearly differentiated NSSI from suicidal self-injury (SSI). Consistent with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, definition of NSSI, we excluded studies examining populations with developmental or intellectual disabilities, or with psychotic disorders.ResultsSeveral interventions appear to hold promise for reducing NSSI, including dialectical behaviour therapy, emotion regulation group therapy, manual-assisted cognitive therapy, dynamic deconstructive psychotherapy, atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole), naltrexone, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (with or without cognitive-behavioural therapy). Nevertheless, there remains a paucity of well-controlled studies investigating treatment efficacy for NSSI.ConclusionsStructured psychotherapeutic approaches focusing on collaborative therapeutic relationships, motivation for change, and directly addressing NSSI behaviours seem to be most effective in reducing NSSI. Medications targeting the serotonergic, dopaminergic and opioid systems also have demonstrated some benefits. Future studies employing controlled designs as well as a clear delineation of NSSI and SSI will improve knowledge regarding treatment effects.

Dataset Information

Complications of treating terrible triad injury of the elbow: a systematic review.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Complications of treating terrible triad injury of the elbow: a systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets