Dataset Information

Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3-6 injured occupants.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To examine the damage location distribution of five main body region injuries of maximum abbreviated injury score (MAIS) 3-6 injured occupants for nearside struck vehicle in front-to-side impact crashes.

Design and setting

MAIS 3-6 injured occupants information was extracted from the US-National Automotive Sampling System/Crashworthiness Data System in the year 2007; it included the head/face/neck, chest, pelvis, upper extremity and lower extremity. Struck vehicle collision damage was classified in a three-dimensional system according to the J224 Collision Deformation Classification of SAE Surface Vehicle Standard.

Participants

Nearside occupants seated directly adjacent to the struck side of the vehicle with MAIS 3-6 injured, in light truck vehicles-passenger cars (LTV-PC) side impact crashes.

Outcome measures

Distribution of MAIS 3-6 injured occupants by body regions and specific location of damage (lateral direction, horizontal direction and vertical direction) were examined. Injury risk ratio was also assessed.

Results

The lateral crush zone contributed to MAIS 3-6 injured occupants (n=705) and 50th centile injury risks when extended into zone 3. When the crush extended to zone 4, the injury risk ratio of MAIS 3-6 injured occupants approached 81%. The horizontal crush zones contributing to the highest injury risk ratio of MAIS 3-6 occupants were zones 'D' and 'Y', and the injury risk ratios were 25.4% and 36.9%, respectively. In contrast, the lowest injury risk ratio was 5.67% caused by zone 'B'. The vertical crush zone which contributed to the highest injury risk ratio of MAIS 3-6 occupants was zone 'E', whose injury risk ratio was 58%. In contrast, the lowest injury risk ratio was 0.14% caused by zone 'G+M'.

Conclusions

The highest injury risk ratio of MAIS 3-6 injured occupants caused by crush intrusion between 40 and 60 cm in LTV-PC nearside impact collisions and the damage region of the struck vehicle was in the zones 'E' and 'Y'.

SUBMITTER: Tang Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4024600 | biostudies-literature | 2014 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3-6 injured occupants.

Tang Youming Y Cao Libo L Kan Steven S

BMJ open 20140508 5

<h4>Objectives</h4>To examine the damage location distribution of five main body region injuries of maximum abbreviated injury score (MAIS) 3-6 injured occupants for nearside struck vehicle in front-to-side impact crashes.<h4>Design and setting</h4>MAIS 3-6 injured occupants information was extracted from the US-National Automotive Sampling System/Crashworthiness Data System in the year 2007; it included the head/face/neck, chest, pelvis, upper extremity and lower extremity. Struck vehicle colli ...[more]

PMID: 24812190

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:Characterization of the severity of injury should account for both mortality and disability. The objective of this study was to develop a disability metric for thoracic injuries in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) and compare the functional outcomes between the pediatric and adult populations. METHODS:Disability risk (DR) was quantified using Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores within the National Trauma Data Bank for the most frequently occurring Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2-5 thoracic injuries. Occupants with thoracic injury were classified as disabled or not disabled based on the FIM scale, and comparisons were made between the following age groups: pediatric, adult, middle-aged, and older occupants (ages 7-18, 19-45, 46-65, and 66+, respectively). For each age group, DR was calculated by dividing the number of patients who were disabled and sustained a given injury by the number of patients who sustained a given injury. To account for the effect of higher severity co-injuries, a maximum AIS adjusted DR (DRMAIS) was also calculated for each injury. DR and DRMAIS could range from 0 to 100% disability risk. RESULTS:The mean DRMAIS for MVC thoracic injuries was 20% for pediatric occupants, 22% for adults, 29% for middle-aged adults, and 43% for older adults. Older adults possessed higher DRMAIS values for diaphragm laceration/rupture, heart laceration, hemo/pneumothorax, lung contusion/laceration, and rib and sternum fracture compared to the other age groups. The pediatric population possessed a higher DRMAIS value for flail chest compared to the other age groups. CONCLUSION:Older adults had significantly greater overall disability than each of the other age groups for thoracic injuries. The developed disability metrics are important in quantifying the significant burden of injuries and loss of quality life years. Such metrics can be used to better characterize severity of injury and further the understanding of age-related differences in injury outcomes, which can influence future age-specific modifications to AIS.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:The objective of the study was to develop a disability-based metric for motor vehicle crash (MVC) injuries, with a focus on head injuries, and compare the functional outcomes between the pediatric and adult populations. METHODS:Disability risk (DR) was quantified using Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores within the National Trauma Data Bank-Research Data System (NTDB-RDS) for the top 95% most frequently occurring Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 3, 4, and 5 head injuries in NASS-CDS 2000-2011. Pediatric (ages 7-18), adult (19-45), middle-aged (46-65), and older adult (66+) patients with an FIM score available who were alive at discharge and had an AIS 3, 4, or 5 injury were included in the study. The NTDB-RDS contains a truncated form of the FIM instrument, including 3 items (self-feed, locomotion, and verbal expression), each graded on a scale of 1 (full functional dependence) to 4 (full functional independence). Patients within each age group were classified as disabled or not disabled based on the FIM scale. The DR was calculated for each age group by dividing the number of patients who sustained a specific injury and were disabled by the number of patients who sustained the specific injury. To account for the impact of more severe associated coinjuries, a maximum AIS (MAIS) adjusted DR (DRMAIS) was also calculated for each injury. DR and DRMAIS ranged from 0 (0% disability risk) to 1 (100% disability risk). RESULTS:An analysis of the most frequent FIM components associated with disabling MVC head injuries revealed that disability across all 3 items (self-feed, locomotion, and expression) was the most frequent for pediatric and adult patients. Only locomotion was the most frequent for middle-aged and older adults. The mean DRMAIS for MVC head injuries was 35% for pediatric patients, 36% for adults, 38% for middle-aged adults, and 44% for older adults. Further analysis was conducted by grouping the head injuries into 8 groups based on the structure of injury and injury type. The pediatric population possessed higher DRMAIS values for brain stem injuries as well as loss of consciousness injuries. Older adults possessed higher DRMAIS values for contusion/hemorrhage injuries, epidural hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, skull fracture, and subdural/subarachnoid hemorrhage. CONCLUSION:At-risk populations such as pediatric and older adult patients possessed higher DRMAIS values for different head injuries. Disability in pediatric patients is critical due to loss of quality life years. Disability risk can supplement severity metrics to improve the ability of such metrics to discriminate the severity of different injuries that do not lead to death. Understanding of age-related differences in injury outcomes when compared to adults could inform future age-specific modifications to the AIS.

Project description:Objective: The objective was to develop a disability-based metric for motor vehicle crash (MVC) upper and lower extremity injuries and compare functional outcomes between children and adults.Methods: Disability risk (DR) was quantified using Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores within the National Trauma Data Bank-Research Data System for the top 95% most frequently occurring Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 3 extremity injuries (22 unique injuries). Pediatric (7-18 years), young adult (19-45 years), middle-aged (46-65 years), and older adult (66+ years) MVC occupants with an FIM score and at least one of the 22 extremity injuries were included. DR was calculated for each injury as the proportion of occupants who were disabled of those sustaining the injury. A maximum AIS-adjusted disability risk (DRMAIS) was also calculated for each injury, excluding occupants with AIS 4+ co-injuries.Results: Locomotion impairment was the most frequent disability type across all ages. DR and DRMAIS of the extremity injuries ranged from 0.06 to 1.00 (6%-100% disability risk). Disability risk increased with age, with DRMAIS increasing from 25.9% ± 8.6% (mean ± SD) in pediatric subjects to 30.4% ± 6.3% in young adults, 39.5% ± 6.6% in middle-aged adults, and 60.5 ± 13.3% in older adults. DRMAIS for upper extremity fractures differed significantly between age groups, with higher disability in older adults, followed by middle-aged adults. DRMAIS for pelvis, hip, shaft, knee, and other lower extremity fractures differed significantly between age groups, with older adult DRMAIS being significantly higher for each fracture type. DRMAIS for hip and lower extremity shaft fractures was also significantly higher in middle-aged occupants compared to pediatric and young adult occupants. The maximum AIS-adjusted mortality risk (MRMAIS, proportion of fatalities among occupants sustaining an MAIS 3 injury) was not correlated with DRMAIS for extremity injuries in pediatric, young adult, middle-aged, and older adult occupants (all R2 < 0.01). Disability associated with each extremity injury was higher than mortality risk.Conclusions: Older adults had significantly greater disability for MVC extremity injuries. Lower disability rates in children may stem from their increased physiological capacity for bone healing and relative lack of bone disease. The disability metrics developed can supplement AIS and other severity-based metrics by accounting for the age-specific functional implications of MVC extremity injuries.

Project description:PurposeThe presence of soft tissue injury in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) has been shown to be an independent predictor of any neurovascular injury. Potentially expanding this concept, the specific neurovascular structure injured around the elbow is thought to be dependent upon the direction and magnitude of fracture displacement and subsequent soft tissue injury. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the bruise location following SCHF is indicative of the anatomic location of maximal soft tissue injury and therefore is a specific prognosticator of which neurovascular structure may be injured.MethodsRetrospective chart review of all SCHFs treated at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2007 to 2017 collected information on bruise location, neurovascular injury patterns, and outcomes. Bruise location was classified as anterior, anterolateral, anteromedial, or posterior. Injury radiographs were reviewed by a blinded pediatric orthopaedic surgeon to neurovascular structure injured.ResultsOf 2845 SCHFs identified, 267 (9.4%) had concomitant neurovascular injury-of which 128 (47.9%) met inclusion criteria. Among the vascular injuries, all bruising was anteromedial (28/45, 62.2%, P<0.05) or anterior (17/45, 37.8%, P>0.05). Fractures with anteromedial bruising correlated with median nerve injury (24/27, 88.9%, P<0.05), whereas fractures with anterolateral bruising correlated with radial nerve injuries (24/25, 96.0%, P<0.05). Bruising or radiographic evaluation correctly identified 60.2% and 64.1% of neurovascular injuries, respectively, whereas the combination identified 82.0% of neurovascular injuries correctly. Bruise location identified 23 neurovascular injuries not predicted by radiographic evaluation alone.ConclusionBruise location is an important physical examination finding that can be used as an adjunct to improve the diagnostic accuracy of neurovascular injury in SCHFs in conjunction with neurovascular physical examination and radiographic evaluation. SCHFs with anterior or anteromedial bruising should raise concern for vascular injury. In addition, anteromedial bruising is predictive of a median nerve injury and anterolateral bruising is predictive of radial nerve injury. This adjunct diagnostic is particularly helpful in a noncooperative child or if performed by a clinician with limited experience in diagnosing neurovascular injuries or interpreting pediatric elbow radiographs.Level of evidenceLevel IV, case series.

Project description:BackgroundMusculoskeletal injuries occur frequently in runners and despite many studies about running injuries conducted over the past decades it is not clear in the literature what are the main running-related musculoskeletal injuries (RRMIs).ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to systematically review studies on the incidence and prevalence of the main specific RRMIs.MethodsAn electronic database search was conducted using EMBASE (1947 to October 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2011), SPORTDiscus(1975 to October 2011), the Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (LILACS) [1982 to October 2011] and the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) [1998 to October 2011] with no limits of date or language of publication. Articles that described the incidence or prevalence rates of RRMIs were considered eligible. Studies that reported only the type of injury, anatomical region or incomplete data that precluded interpretation of the incidence or prevalence rates of RRMIs were excluded. We extracted data regarding bibliometric characteristics, study design, description of the population of runners, RRMI definition, how the data of RRMIs were collected and the name of each RRMI with their rates of incidence or prevalence. Separate analysis for ultra-marathoners was performed. Among 2924 potentially eligible titles, eight studies (pooled n = 3500 runners) were considered eligible for the review. In general, the articles had moderate risk of bias and only one fulfilled less than half of the quality criteria established.ResultsA total of 28 RRMIs were found and the main general RRMIs were medial tibial stress syndrome (incidence ranging from 13.6% to 20.0%; prevalence of 9.5%), Achilles tendinopathy (incidence ranging from 9.1% to 10.9%; prevalence ranging from 6.2% to 9.5%) and plantar fasciitis (incidence ranging from 4.5% to 10.0%; prevalence ranging from 5.2% to 17.5%). The main ultra-marathon RRMIs were Achilles tendinopathy (prevalence ranging from 2.0% to 18.5%) and patellofemoral syndrome (prevalence ranging from 7.4% to 15.6%).ConclusionThis systematic review provides evidence that medial tibia stress syndrome, Achilles tendinopathy and plantar fasciitis were the main general RRMIs, while Achilles tendinopathy and patellofemoral syndrome were the most common RRMIs for runners who participated in ultra-marathon races.

Dataset Information

Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3-6 injured occupants.

Objectives

Design and setting

Participants

Outcome measures

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Associations between damage location and five main body region injuries of MAIS 3-6 injured occupants.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets