Dataset Information

Prior antiarrhythmic drug use and the outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is generally performed after patients fail antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. Some patients have drug contraindications or choose to avoid a lifetime of drug therapy. Little is known about the impact of previous drug therapy on ablation outcomes. We evaluated AAD use before AF ablation and its impact on ablation outcomes.

Methods and results

We evaluated freedom from AF after ablation and patients' clinical characteristics by number of AADs failed in 1125 patients undergoing 1504 ablations. We also evaluated reasons why some patients did not receive prior drug therapy. Cox multivariate analysis examined factors predicting ablation failure. Patients failing more drugs before ablation were older (P = 0.001), had a longer duration of AF (P = 0.0001), were more likely female (P = 0.037), had more repeat ablations (P = 0.045), and less paroxysmal AF (P = 0.003). For patients with either paroxysmal or persistent AF, the number of drugs failed predicted AF recurrence (P = 0.0001). Other factors predicting AF recurrence following final ablation included age (P = 0.004), left atrial size (P = 0.002), female gender (P = 0.0001), and persistent AF (P = 0.0001). The reason for not receiving prior drug therapy was medical in 21.5% and patient choice in 78.5%. Number of drugs failed did not influence ablation outcome for patients with long-standing persistent AF (P = 0.352).

Conclusions

For paroxysmal and persistent AF patients undergoing ablation, those failing fewer AADs have different clinical characteristics than those who fail more drugs. Our study also suggests that the more drugs failed pre-ablation, the lower the freedom from AF post-procedure, possibly due to AF progression during drug trials.

SUBMITTER: Winkle RA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4051413 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe CABANA (Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation) trial randomized 2,204 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to catheter ablation or drug therapy. Analysis by intention-to-treat showed a nonsignificant 14% relative reduction in the primary outcome of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess recurrence of AF in the CABANA trial.MethodsThe authors prospectively studied CABANA patients using a proprietary electrocardiogram recording monitor for symptom-activated and 24-h AF auto detection. The AF recurrence endpoint was any post-90-day blanking atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting 30 s or longer. Biannual 96-h Holter monitoring was used to assess AF burden. Patients who used the CABANA monitors and provided 90-day post-blanking recordings qualified for this analysis (n = 1,240; 56% of CABANA population). Treatment comparisons were performed using a modified intention-to-treat approach.ResultsMedian age of the 1,240 patients was 68 years, 34.4% were women, and AF was paroxysmal in 43.0%. Over 60 months of follow-up, first recurrence of any symptomatic or asymptomatic AF (hazard ratio: 0.52; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.60; p < 0.001) or first symptomatic-only AF (hazard ratio: 0.49; 95% confidence interval: 0.39 to 0.61; p < 0.001) were both significantly reduced in the catheter ablation group. Baseline Holter AF burden in both treatment groups was 48%. At 12 months, AF burden in ablation patients averaged 6.3%, and in drug-therapy patients, 14.4%. AF burden was significantly less in catheter ablation compared with drug-therapy patients across the 5-year follow-up (p < 0.001). These findings were not sensitive to the baseline pattern of AF.ConclusionsCatheter ablation was effective in reducing recurrence of any AF by 48% and symptomatic AF by 51% compared with drug therapy over 5 years of follow-up. Furthermore, AF burden was also significantly reduced in catheter ablation patients, regardless of their baseline AF type. (Catheter Ablation vs Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial [CABANA]; NCT00911508).

Project description:IntroductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a heritable disease, and the paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) gene is highly associated with AF. We explored the differences in the circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI), which is the cornerstone procedure for AF catheter ablation, additional high dominant frequency (DF) site ablation, and antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) effects according to the patient genotype (wild-type and PITX2 +/- deficient) using computational modeling.MethodsWe included 25 patients with AF (68% men, 59.8 ± 9.8 years of age, 32% paroxysmal AF) who underwent AF catheter ablation to develop a realistic computational AF model. The ion currents for baseline AF and the amiodarone, dronedarone, and flecainide AADs according to the patient genotype (wild type and PITX2 +/- deficient) were defined by relevant publications. We tested the virtual CPVI (V-CPVI) with and without DF ablation (±DFA) and three virtual AADs (V-AADs, amiodarone, dronedarone, and flecainide) and evaluated the AF defragmentation rates (AF termination or changes to regular atrial tachycardia (AT), DF, and maximal slope of the action potential duration restitution curves (Smax), which indicates the vulnerability of wave-breaks.ResultsAt the baseline AF, mean DF (p = 0.003), and Smax (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in PITX2 +/- deficient patients than wild-type patients. In the overall AF episodes, V-CPVI (±DFA) resulted in a higher AF defragmentation relative to V-AADs (65 vs. 42%, p < 0.001) without changing the DF or Smax. Although a PITX2 +/- deficiency did not affect the AF defragmentation rate after the V-CPVI (±DFA), V-AADs had a higher AF defragmentation rate (p = 0.014), lower DF (p < 0.001), and lower Smax (p = 0.001) in PITX2 +/- deficient AF than in wild-type patients. In the clinical setting, the PITX2 +/- genetic risk score did not affect the AF ablation rhythm outcome (Log-rank p = 0.273).ConclusionConsistent with previous clinical studies, the V-CPVI had effective anti-AF effects regardless of the PITX2 genotype, whereas V-AADs exhibited more significant defragmentation or wave-dynamic change in the PITX2 +/- deficient patients.