Dataset Information

Development and evaluation of Korean version of Quality of Sexual Function (QSF-K) in healthy Korean women.

ABSTRACT: This study was done to develop a Korean version of the Quality of Sexual Function (QSF-K) and evaluate the validity and reliability of the QSF-K. The participants were 220 women who visited the Center for Uterine Cancer at the National Cancer Center in Korea. Participants completed the scale once and then again at a two to four week interval. The QSF-K, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) were used in this study. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve (AUC), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Cronbach's alpha were analyzed. In the analysis of the reliability, Cronbach's alpha was 0.83 and the ICC was 0.70. The validity measured with the AUC of the QSF-K comparing the FSFI and Global Health/QOL of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 was 0.717 and 0.728, respectively. Specifically, the AUC of the sexual activity level of the QSF-K was 0.838 in the FSFI comparison. The AUC of the psycho-somatic QOL of the QSF-K was 0.758 in the Global Health/QOL of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 comparison. Approximately half of the women (51.8%) had mild complaints/problems. The Korean version of the QSF was developed and validated.

SUBMITTER: Lee Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4055806 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Development and evaluation of Korean version of Quality of Sexual Function (QSF-K) in healthy Korean women.

Lee Yumi Y Lim Myong Cheol MC Son Yedong Y Joo Jungnam J Park KiByung K Kim Jung-Sup JS Lee Dong Ock DO Park Sang-Yoon SY

Journal of Korean medical science 20140530 6

This study was done to develop a Korean version of the Quality of Sexual Function (QSF-K) and evaluate the validity and reliability of the QSF-K. The participants were 220 women who visited the Center for Uterine Cancer at the National Cancer Center in Korea. Participants completed the scale once and then again at a two to four week interval. The QSF-K, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC- ...[more]

PMID: 24932074

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMost studies on female sexual dysfunction are performed in population inventories and under specific clinical conditions. These approaches are performed using validated psychometric scales. Different scales to assess sexual function use different numbers of questions to characterize their domains. They also may or may not include domains of interaction between sexual partners. The objective of this study was to compare the precision between scales to be able to analyze their accuracy for better diagnosis of sexual dysfunction.MethodsFifty (50) healthy young women were enrolled in this study. Three questionnaires (FSFI, SQ-F, and GRISS) were applied to assess sexual function (n = 44). The accuracy measured by the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for individual domains and to cross-validated pairwise comparison of the three analyzed instruments was used. Kruskall-Wallis test to analyze individual domains of the scales was also used.The P-value was established as 0.05.ResultsThe results showed that all domains and total FSFI and GRISS scores were significantly different between normal and dysfunctional women, but not for SQ-F domains. Indeed, AUC accuracy varied from excellent-good domain discrimination for FSFI and GRISS, but fair-poor for SQ-F. For the paired comparison between the three questionnaires a fair accuracy was detected. The specificity percentage was around 84% whereas that for sensibility was low, around 30%.ConclusionsThe best agreement was between FSFI and SQ-F, probably being related to high similar shared questions when compared to GRISS. The agreement between SQ-F and GRISS was low possible due to low number of questions in SQ-F to characterize similar domains. This study evidenced high agreement between scales to sensitivity and low agreement for specificity, thereby conferring fair accuracy between them. Thus, the limited grade for discriminatory capacity (AUC) for sexual response should be considered when comparing results from these three different questionnaires and also when comparing with other different scales. In addition, despite the diversity of scales, the high reliability and fit for their desire domain suggest that the FSFI scale has good accuracy for the current clinical assessment of women's sexual health.Clinical trial registrationNCT03241524 . Retrospectively registered on 08/02/2017.

Project description:Background Previous research indicating that women with differences of sexual development (DSD), namely women with Turner syndrome (TS), women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), and women with XY-DSD, have an impaired psychosocial and sexual well-being and quality of life (QOL), was often limited by small samples and inadequate control groups (CGs). Only few studies analysed which psychosocial and sexual factors influence QOL in women with DSD and no study so far has examined whether the DSD-condition itself and the diagnostic group to which they belong moderate this influence. Methods We compared 301 women with TS, 221 women with CAH and 142 women with XY-DSD with 603 non-DSD women regarding depression, anxiety, self-esteem, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, social participation, body acceptance, relationship status, sexual satisfaction and QOL. Furthermore, we investigated the influence of psychosocial and sexual well-being on QOL within and between diagnostic groups and examined whether the DSD-condition moderates the influence of psychosocial and sexual well-being on QOL. Results Women with DSD reported average psychosocial well-being and QOL; only women with CAH reported an impaired physical QOL. However, women with DSD were less satisfied with their body and had less often a partner than women in the CG. Women with CAH and XY-DSD were less satisfied with their sex life compared to women in the CG. Across groups, better health and lower depression scores predicted better QOL, whereas higher self-esteem especially predicted better QOL in women with DSD. The presence of DSD moderated the influence of psychosocial and sexual well-being on QOL, however, the specific diagnosis group mainly moderated the influence on physical QOL. Conclusion We have learned that body and sexual satisfaction need further attention in women with DSD. To optimize their QOL, psychosocial well-being should be taken in account. The improvement of self-esteem seems particularly relevant for women with DSD, as this helps coping with having a variant of sexual development. Highlights • Psychosocial wellbeing and QOL in women with DSD are similar compared to women of the general population.• Psychosexual wellbeing and body satisfaction in women with DSD are still reduced.• Quality of life in women with DSD is best predicted by good health, low depression and high self-esteem.• Self-esteem predicts quality of life better in women with than without DSD.

Dataset Information

Development and evaluation of Korean version of Quality of Sexual Function (QSF-K) in healthy Korean women.

Publications

Development and evaluation of Korean version of Quality of Sexual Function (QSF-K) in healthy Korean women.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets