Dataset Information

Multilevel competing risk models to evaluate the risk of nosocomial infection.

ABSTRACT: Risk factor analyses for nosocomial infections (NIs) are complex. First, due to competing events for NI, the association between risk factors of NI as measured using hazard rates may not coincide with the association using cumulative probability (risk). Second, patients from the same intensive care unit (ICU) who share the same environmental exposure are likely to be more similar with regard to risk factors predisposing to a NI than patients from different ICUs. We aimed to develop an analytical approach to account for both features and to use it to evaluate associations between patient- and ICU-level characteristics with both rates of NI and competing risks and with the cumulative probability of infection.We considered a multicenter database of 159 intensive care units containing 109,216 admissions (813,739 admission-days) from the Spanish HELICS-ENVIN ICU network. We analyzed the data using two models: an etiologic model (rate based) and a predictive model (risk based). In both models, random effects (shared frailties) were introduced to assess heterogeneity. Death and discharge without NI are treated as competing events for NI.There was a large heterogeneity across ICUs in NI hazard rates, which remained after accounting for multilevel risk factors, meaning that there are remaining unobserved ICU-specific factors that influence NI occurrence. Heterogeneity across ICUs in terms of cumulative probability of NI was even more pronounced. Several risk factors had markedly different associations in the rate-based and risk-based models. For some, the associations differed in magnitude. For example, high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were associated with modest increases in the rate of nosocomial bacteremia, but large increases in the risk. Others differed in sign, for example respiratory vs cardiovascular diagnostic categories were associated with a reduced rate of nosocomial bacteremia, but an increased risk.A combination of competing risks and multilevel models is required to understand direct and indirect risk factors for NI and distinguish patient-level from ICU-level factors.

SUBMITTER: Wolkewitz M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4056071 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Multilevel competing risk models to evaluate the risk of nosocomial infection.

Wolkewitz Martin M Cooper Ben S BS Palomar-Martinez Mercedes M Alvarez-Lerma Francisco F Olaechea-Astigarraga Pedro P Barnett Adrian G AG Harbarth Stephan S Schumacher Martin M

Critical care (London, England) 20140408 2

<h4>Introduction</h4>Risk factor analyses for nosocomial infections (NIs) are complex. First, due to competing events for NI, the association between risk factors of NI as measured using hazard rates may not coincide with the association using cumulative probability (risk). Second, patients from the same intensive care unit (ICU) who share the same environmental exposure are likely to be more similar with regard to risk factors predisposing to a NI than patients from different ICUs. We aimed to ...[more]

PMID: 24713511

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundA major challenge for most tuberculosis programs is the inability of tuberculosis patients to complete treatment for one reason or another. Failure to complete the treatment contributes to the emergence of multidrug-resistant TB. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for time to loss to follow-up treatment by considering death as a competing risk event among tuberculosis patients admitted to directly observed treatment short course at Ambo General Hospital, Ambo, Ethiopia.MethodsData collected from 457 tuberculosis patients from January 2018 to January 2022 were used for the analysis. The cause-specific hazard and sub-distribution hazard models for competing risks were used to model the outcome of interest and to identify the prognostic factors associated to treatment loss to follow-up. Loss to follow-up was used as an outcome measure and death as a competing event.ResultsOf the 457 tuberculosis patients enrolled, 54 (11.8%) were loss to follow-up their treatment and 33 (7.2%) died during the follow up period. The median time of loss to follow-up starting from the date of treatment initiation was 4.2 months. The cause-specific hazard and sub-distribution hazard models revealed that sex, place of residence, HIV status, contact history, age and baseline weights of patients were significant risk factors associated with time to loss to follow-up treatment. The findings showed that the estimates of the covariates effects were different for the cause specific and sub-distribution hazard models. The maximum relative difference observed for the covariate between the cause specific and sub-distribution hazard ratios was 12.2%.ConclusionsPatients who were male, rural residents, HIV positive, and aged 41 years or older were at higher risk of loss to follow-up their treatment. This underlines the need that tuberculosis patients, especially those in risk categories, be made aware of the length of the directly observed treatment short course and the effects of discontinuing treatment.

Dataset Information

Multilevel competing risk models to evaluate the risk of nosocomial infection.

Publications

Multilevel competing risk models to evaluate the risk of nosocomial infection.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets